Hawkins Julie A, Hughes Colin E, Scotland Robert W
Department of Plant Sciences, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3RB, U.K.
Cladistics. 1997 Sep;13(3):275-283. doi: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.1997.tb00320.x.
We discuss contrasting approaches to cladistic character definition and thus to cladistic data matrix compilation. The conventional approach considers character states as alternate forms of the "same thing" (the character). A review of the challenges to this convention is presented, and their implications evaluated. We argue that the recognition of structures which are alternate forms is a vital stage of primary homology assessment and is equivalent to the conceptualization of a transformational homology. Such a view complies with the demand that characters are independent and that character states are hierarchically related. We identify one justifiable solution to the inapplicable data coding problem (coding for organisms which have red tails, blue tails or no tails), and show that alternative approaches to character definition support spurious solutions which deny the relation of structures which are "the same but different". We propose that the term character can be defined, in a cladistic context, as the descriptive label referring to a transformational homology evidenced by the similarity criterion.
我们讨论了关于支序分类特征定义以及由此进行支序分类数据矩阵编制的不同方法。传统方法将特征状态视为“同一事物”(特征)的交替形式。本文对这一传统观念所面临的挑战进行了综述,并评估了其影响。我们认为,识别作为交替形式的结构是初步同源性评估的关键阶段,等同于对转化同源性的概念化。这种观点符合特征应独立且特征状态应具有层次关系的要求。我们确定了一个针对不适用数据编码问题(对有红色尾巴、蓝色尾巴或无尾巴的生物体进行编码)的合理解决方案,并表明特征定义的替代方法支持虚假解决方案,这些方案否认了“相同但不同”结构之间的关系。我们建议,在支序分类的背景下,术语“特征”可以定义为通过相似性标准证明的转化同源性的描述性标签。