• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

更安全的药物处方:PREFASEG 系统在加泰罗尼亚基层医疗中辅助临床决策的影响。

Safer prescription of drugs: impact of the PREFASEG system to aid clinical decision-making in primary care in Catalonia.

机构信息

Unitat de Coordinació i Estratègia del Medicament (UCEM), Institut Català de la Salut, Barcelona, Spain.

Departament de Farmacologia, Terapèutica i Toxicologia, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 Dec 15;21(1):349. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01710-8.

DOI:10.1186/s12911-021-01710-8
PMID:34911534
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8675496/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In 2008, the Institut Català de la Salut (ICS, Catalan Health Institute) implemented a prescription decision support system in its electronic clinical workstation (ECW), which automatically generates online alerts for general practitioners when a possible medication-related problem (MRP) is detected. This tool is known as PREFASEG, and at the time of beginning a new treatment, it automatically assesses the suitability of the treatment for the individual patient. This analysis is based on ongoing treatments, demographic characteristics, existing pathologies, and patient biochemical variables. As a result of the assessment, therapeutic recommendations are provided. The objective of this study is to present the PREFASEG tool, analyse the main alerts that it generates, and determine the degree of alert acceptance.

METHODS

A cross-sectional descriptive study was carried out to analyse the generation of MRP-related alerts detected by PREFASEG during 2016, 2017, and 2018 in primary care (PC) in Catalonia. The number of MRP alerts generated, the drugs involved, and the acceptance/rejection of the alerts were analysed. An alert was considered "accepted" when the medication that generated the alert was not prescribed, thereby following the recommendation given by the tool. The MRP alerts studied were therapeutic duplications, safety alerts issued by the Spanish Medicines Agency, and drugs not recommended for use in geriatrics. The prescriptions issued by 6411 ICS PC physicians who use the ECW and provide their services to 5.8 million Catalans through 288 PC teams were analysed.

RESULTS

During the 3 years examined, 67.2 million new prescriptions were analysed, for which PREFASEG generated 4,379,866 alerts (1 for every 15 new treatments). A total of 1,222,159 alerts (28%) were accepted. Pharmacological interactions and therapeutic duplications were the most detected alerts, representing 40 and 30% of the total alerts, respectively. The main pharmacological groups involved in the safety alerts were nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and renin-angiotensin system inhibitors.

CONCLUSIONS

During the period analysed, 28% of the prescriptions wherein a toxicity-related PREFASEG alert was generated led to treatment modification, thereby helping to prevent the generation of potential safety MRPs. However, the tool should be further improved to increase alert acceptance and thereby improve patient safety.

摘要

背景

2008 年,加泰罗尼亚卫生研究所(ICS)在其电子临床工作站(ECW)中实施了处方决策支持系统,当检测到可能与药物相关的问题(MRP)时,该系统会自动为全科医生生成在线警报。该工具称为 PREFASEG,在开始新的治疗时,它会自动评估治疗方案对个体患者的适宜性。这种分析基于正在进行的治疗、人口统计学特征、现有病理和患者生化变量。根据评估结果,提供治疗建议。本研究的目的是介绍 PREFASEG 工具,分析其生成的主要警报,并确定警报接受程度。

方法

我们进行了一项横断面描述性研究,以分析 2016 年、2017 年和 2018 年在加泰罗尼亚初级保健(PC)中 PREFASEG 检测到的与药物相关问题警报的生成情况。分析生成的药物相关问题警报数量、涉及的药物以及对警报的接受/拒绝情况。当生成警报的药物未开处方,从而遵循工具给出的建议时,该警报被视为“接受”。所研究的药物相关问题警报包括治疗性重复用药、西班牙药品管理局发布的安全性警报以及不建议在老年患者中使用的药物。分析了使用 ECW 并通过 288 个 PC 团队为 580 万加泰罗尼亚人提供服务的 6411 名 ICS PC 医生开出的 6720 万张新处方。

结果

在研究的 3 年中,共分析了 6720 万张新处方,其中 PREFASEG 生成了 4379866 个警报(每 15 个新处方就有 1 个警报)。共接受了 1222159 个警报(28%)。药物相互作用和治疗性重复用药是检测到的最多的警报,分别占总警报的 40%和 30%。涉及安全性警报的主要药物类别是非甾体抗炎药和肾素-血管紧张素系统抑制剂。

结论

在所分析的时间段内,有 28%的处方在生成毒性相关的 PREFASEG 警报后进行了治疗调整,从而有助于防止潜在的安全药物相关问题的发生。然而,该工具应进一步改进,以提高警报接受率,从而提高患者安全性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f2d7/8675496/70be97a88601/12911_2021_1710_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f2d7/8675496/a4211dc30851/12911_2021_1710_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f2d7/8675496/9f1985d76257/12911_2021_1710_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f2d7/8675496/70be97a88601/12911_2021_1710_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f2d7/8675496/a4211dc30851/12911_2021_1710_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f2d7/8675496/9f1985d76257/12911_2021_1710_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f2d7/8675496/70be97a88601/12911_2021_1710_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Safer prescription of drugs: impact of the PREFASEG system to aid clinical decision-making in primary care in Catalonia.更安全的药物处方:PREFASEG 系统在加泰罗尼亚基层医疗中辅助临床决策的影响。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 Dec 15;21(1):349. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01710-8.
2
Impact of a system to assist in clinical decision-making in primary healthcare in Catalonia: prescription Self Audit.加泰罗尼亚基层医疗中辅助临床决策系统的影响:处方自我审核
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022 Mar 19;22(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-01809-6.
3
[Patient safety in primary care: PREFASEG project].[初级保健中的患者安全:PREFASEG项目]
Med Clin (Barc). 2014 Jul;143 Suppl 1:32-5. doi: 10.1016/j.medcli.2014.07.008.
4
Ability of machine-learning based clinical decision support system to reduce alert fatigue, wrong-drug errors, and alert users about look alike, sound alike medication.基于机器学习的临床决策支持系统能够减少警报疲劳、错误用药错误,并提醒用户注意类似药物。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2024 Jan;243:107869. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2023.107869. Epub 2023 Oct 16.
5
Prescriber response to computerized drug alerts for electronic prescriptions among hospitalized patients.住院患者中处方医生对电子处方的计算机化药物警报的反应。
Int J Med Inform. 2017 Nov;107:70-75. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.08.008. Epub 2017 Aug 31.
6
The Acceptance of Interruptive Medication Alerts in an Electronic Decision Support System Differs between Different Alert Types.电子决策支持系统中中断式用药提醒的接受程度因提醒类型的不同而有所差异。
Methods Inf Med. 2021 Dec;60(5-06):180-184. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1735169. Epub 2021 Aug 27.
7
Nature and frequency of drug therapy alerts generated by clinical decision support in community pharmacy.社区药房临床决策支持系统产生的药物治疗警报的性质和频率
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2016 Jan;25(1):82-9. doi: 10.1002/pds.3915. Epub 2015 Nov 25.
8
A randomized trial of the effectiveness of on-demand versus computer-triggered drug decision support in primary care.一项关于按需用药与计算机触发的药物决策支持在初级保健中的有效性的随机试验。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2008 Jul-Aug;15(4):430-8. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2606. Epub 2008 Apr 24.
9
The effect of provider characteristics on the responses to medication-related decision support alerts.医疗服务提供者特征对药物相关决策支持警报响应的影响。
Int J Med Inform. 2015 Sep;84(9):630-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.04.006. Epub 2015 May 9.
10
Prescription order risk factors for pediatric dosing alerts.儿科给药警报的处方医嘱风险因素。
Int J Med Inform. 2015 Feb;84(2):134-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.11.005. Epub 2014 Nov 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Malaria vaccine rollout begins in Africa: the need to strengthen regulatory and safety surveillance systems in Africa.疟疾疫苗在非洲开始推广:加强非洲监管和安全监测系统的必要性。
BMJ Glob Health. 2024 Oct 9;9(10):e015445. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2024-015445.
2
The impact of a multidisciplinary team intervention on medication prescription in nursing homes in Catalonia.多学科团队干预对加泰罗尼亚养老院药物处方的影响。
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Sep 13;15:1445141. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1445141. eCollection 2024.
3
Expanding access to veterinary clinical decision support in resource-limited settings: a scoping review of clinical decision support tools in medicine and antimicrobial stewardship.

本文引用的文献

1
Challenges of delabelling penicillin allergy.消除青霉素过敏标签的挑战。
Drug Ther Bull. 2021 Nov;59(11):163-164. doi: 10.1136/dtb.2021.000019. Epub 2021 Sep 23.
2
Effectiveness of electronic point-of-care reminders versus monthly feedback to improve adherence to 10 clinical recommendations in primary care: a cluster randomized clinical trial.电子即时提醒与每月反馈对改善初级保健中 10 项临床推荐依从性的效果:一项群组随机临床试验。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019 Nov 29;19(1):245. doi: 10.1186/s12911-019-0976-8.
3
American Geriatrics Society 2019 Updated AGS Beers Criteria® for Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use in Older Adults.
在资源有限的环境中扩大兽医临床决策支持的可及性:医学和抗菌药物管理中临床决策支持工具的范围综述
Front Vet Sci. 2024 Jun 4;11:1349188. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1349188. eCollection 2024.
4
Pharmacological treatments and medication-related problems in nursing homes in Catalonia: a multidisciplinary approach.加泰罗尼亚养老院的药物治疗及与用药相关的问题:一种多学科方法
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Mar 11;15:1320490. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1320490. eCollection 2024.
5
Evaluation of Triple Whammy Prescriptions After the Implementation of a Drug Safety Algorithm.药物安全算法实施后三联处方的评估
Drugs Real World Outcomes. 2024 Mar;11(1):125-135. doi: 10.1007/s40801-023-00405-y. Epub 2024 Jan 6.
6
Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 reinfections in a Spanish region.西班牙某地区新冠病毒再次感染的流行病学和临床特征
SAGE Open Med. 2022 Jun 27;10:20503121221108556. doi: 10.1177/20503121221108556. eCollection 2022.
美国老年医学学会 2019 年更新的老年人潜在不适当药物使用 AGS Beers 标准®。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019 Apr;67(4):674-694. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15767. Epub 2019 Jan 29.
4
Polypharmacy.多重用药
JAMA. 2017 Nov 7;318(17):1728. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.15764.
5
The Dangers of Polypharmacy in Elderly Patients.老年患者多重用药的风险
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Oct 1;177(10):1544. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.4790.
6
Penicillin Allergy Is Not Necessarily Forever.青霉素过敏不一定会持续终生。
JAMA. 2017 Jul 4;318(1):82-83. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.6510.
7
The epidemiology of polypharmacy.多重用药的流行病学。
Clin Med (Lond). 2016 Oct;16(5):465-469. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.16-5-465.
8
The High Impact of Penicillin Allergy Registration in Hospitalized Patients.青霉素过敏登记对住院患者的重大影响。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2016 Sep-Oct;4(5):926-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2016.03.009. Epub 2016 Apr 28.
9
The EU(7)-PIM list: a list of potentially inappropriate medications for older people consented by experts from seven European countries.欧盟(7)-PIM清单:一份由七个欧洲国家的专家认可的老年人潜在不适当药物清单。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2015 Jul;71(7):861-75. doi: 10.1007/s00228-015-1860-9. Epub 2015 May 14.
10
STOPP/START criteria for potentially inappropriate prescribing in older people: version 2.老年人潜在不适当处方的STOPP/START标准:第2版
Age Ageing. 2015 Mar;44(2):213-8. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afu145. Epub 2014 Oct 16.