The First Clinical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Graduate School of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022 May 1;480(5):971-979. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002055. Epub 2021 Dec 17.
Intra-articular injections containing a corticosteroid are used frequently, and periprosthetic joint infection is a serious complication after total joint arthroplasty. There is debate regarding whether intra-articular corticosteroid injections before arthroplasty increase periprosthetic joint infection after surgery.
QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Does a previous intra-articular corticosteroid injection increase the odds of infection after subsequent hip or knee arthroplasty? (2) Does this risk vary based on how soon before the arthroplasty (such as less than 3 months before surgery) the injection is administered?
Using the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases from inception to July 2021, we searched for comparative studies in English on patients who received intra-articular corticosteroid injections before arthroplasty and that tracked the frequency of infection after arthroplasty. We extracted data on the risk of infection after subsequent joint arthroplasty. The keywords included "corticosteroid," "steroid," "arthroplasty," "knee replacement," and "hip replacement." Eleven retrospective, comparative studies from four countries were included, of which 10 reported the specific diagnosis criteria and one did not. These articles included data on 173,465 arthroplasties in the hip or knee, as well as of 73,049 injections and 100,416 control patients. The methodologic quality of the included studies was evaluated according to the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale; the articles' scores ranged from 6 to 7 (the score itself spans 0 to 9, with higher scores representing better study quality). We found no evidence of publication bias based on the Egger test, and tests of heterogeneity generally found heterogeneity, so a random-effects model was used of our meta-analyses. A meta-analysis was performed with Review Manager 5.3 software and Stata version 12.0 software.
Overall, there were no differences in the odds of periprosthetic joint infection between the injection group and the control group among patients who received any kind of injection (odds ratio 1.22 [95% CI 0.95 to 1.58]; p = 0.12). However, in a subgroup analysis, there was a higher OR for postoperative PJI in patients with an intra-articular corticosteroid injection in the knee or hip within 3 months (OR 1.39 [95% CI 1.04 to 1.87]; p = 0.03). There were no differences in the infection risk in patients who had injections between 3 and 6 months before arthroplasty (OR 1.19 [95% CI 0.95 to 1.48]; p = 0.13) or between 6 and 12 months before arthroplasty.
The current evidence suggests ipsilateral intra-articular corticosteroid injections within 3 months before arthroplasty were associated with an increased risk of periprosthetic joint infection during subsequent joint arthroplasty. We recommend against performing total joint arthroplasty on a patient who has received an intra-articular corticosteroid injection within 3 months. Further high-quality studies on this topic from registries, national databases, or insurance company data are still required to confirm and extend our findings.
Level III, therapeutic study.
关节内注射皮质类固醇类药物的应用较为广泛,全膝关节置换术后发生假体周围关节感染是一种严重的并发症。关节内皮质类固醇注射是否会增加全膝关节置换术后假体周围关节感染的风险存在争议。
问题/目的:(1)在接受髋关节或膝关节置换术之前进行关节内皮质类固醇注射是否会增加感染的几率?(2)这种风险是否会因注射与关节置换术的时间间隔(如术前 3 个月内)而有所不同?
通过检索 PubMed、Embase、Cochrane 图书馆和 Web of Science 数据库,我们从建库到 2021 年 7 月,检索了在关节置换术前接受关节内皮质类固醇注射并跟踪关节置换术后感染频率的患者的英文比较研究。我们提取了随后行关节置换术后感染风险的数据。关键词包括“皮质类固醇”、“类固醇”、“关节置换术”、“膝关节置换术”和“髋关节置换术”。纳入了来自四个国家的 11 项回顾性、比较性研究,其中 10 项报告了具体的诊断标准,1 项未报告。这些文章包括了 173465 例髋关节或膝关节置换术的数据,以及 73049 次注射和 100416 例对照患者的数据。我们根据纽卡斯尔-渥太华质量评估量表评估了纳入研究的方法学质量;文章的评分范围为 6 至 7 分(评分本身的范围为 0 至 9 分,分数越高表示研究质量越好)。我们没有发现发表偏倚的证据,异质性检验通常发现存在异质性,因此我们的荟萃分析采用了随机效应模型。使用 Review Manager 5.3 软件和 Stata 版本 12.0 软件进行荟萃分析。
总体而言,接受任何类型注射的患者中,注射组与对照组之间假体周围关节感染的几率没有差异(比值比 1.22 [95%置信区间 0.95 至 1.58];p = 0.12)。然而,在亚组分析中,膝关节或髋关节内关节内皮质类固醇注射后 3 个月内发生术后 PJI 的比值比更高(比值比 1.39 [95%置信区间 1.04 至 1.87];p = 0.03)。在关节置换术前 3 至 6 个月(比值比 1.19 [95%置信区间 0.95 至 1.48];p = 0.13)或 6 至 12 个月前接受注射的患者中,感染风险无差异。
目前的证据表明,在关节置换术 3 个月内同侧关节内皮质类固醇注射与随后的关节置换术后假体周围关节感染的风险增加相关。我们建议在患者在关节内注射皮质类固醇 3 个月内不要进行全关节置换术。需要进一步开展来自登记处、国家数据库或保险公司数据的高质量研究,以证实和扩展我们的发现。
III 级,治疗性研究。