Grüne Bettina, Meesters Sophie, Bausewein Claudia, Schildmann Eva
Department of Palliative Medicine (B.G., S.M., C.B., E.S.), University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany; German Youth Institute (DJI), Department of Youth and Youth Services (B.G.), Munich, Germany.
Department of Palliative Medicine (B.G., S.M., C.B., E.S.), University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany.
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2022 Apr;63(4):530-538. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2021.12.012. Epub 2021 Dec 16.
Sedation is an accepted, but controversially discussed and challenging measure to treat suffering at the end of life. Although most people die in hospitals or nursing homes, little is known how professionals in these settings deal with sedatives and sedation at the end of life.
To explore 1) challenges regarding use of sedatives and sedation at the end of life in hospitals and nursing homes, and 2) strategies, and supportive measures to meet these challenges, as perceived by nurses and physicians.
Multicenter qualitative interview study. Forty-nine participants: 12 general practitioners and 12 nurses from five nursing homes, 12 physicians, and 13 nurses from five hospital departments (hematology/oncology (n = 2), neurology, geriatrics, gynecology). Semi-structured qualitative interviews. Data analysis guided by framework approach.
Perceived challenges relate to three levels of the care situation: individual, interaction with others, and work environment. The main challenge was defining the adequate timing and/or dose. Other challenges, e.g., disagreements regarding indication or legal uncertainties, were highly interrelated, and strongly associated with this major challenge. Reported strategies and supportive measures to address challenges also corresponded to the three interrelated levels. Major named strategies were education and training, joint decision-making within the team and regular discussion with the patient and family. On the level work environment, no implemented strategies, but wishes for change were identified.
To meet the identified challenges in a sustainable way and enable continuous improvement of quality of care, best practice recommendations, and other supportive measures have to address all identified levels of challenges.
镇静是一种被认可但存在争议且具有挑战性的临终痛苦治疗措施。尽管大多数人在医院或养老院去世,但对于这些场所的专业人员在临终时如何使用镇静剂和进行镇静治疗却知之甚少。
探讨1)医院和养老院在临终时使用镇静剂和进行镇静治疗方面的挑战,以及2)护士和医生所认为的应对这些挑战的策略和支持措施。
多中心定性访谈研究。49名参与者:来自5家养老院的12名全科医生和12名护士、12名医生以及来自5个医院科室(血液学/肿瘤学(n = 2)、神经科、老年科、妇科)的13名护士。采用半结构化定性访谈。数据分析采用框架法指导。
所感知到的挑战涉及护理情境的三个层面:个体层面、与他人的互动层面以及工作环境层面。主要挑战是确定合适的时机和/或剂量。其他挑战,例如在适应症方面的分歧或法律不确定性,相互之间高度关联,且与这一主要挑战密切相关。报告的应对挑战的策略和支持措施也对应于这三个相互关联的层面。主要提及的策略包括教育与培训、团队内部的共同决策以及与患者及其家属的定期讨论。在工作环境层面,未发现已实施的策略,但确定了变革的愿望。
为了以可持续的方式应对已确定的挑战并实现护理质量的持续提升,最佳实践建议及其他支持措施必须涵盖所有已确定的挑战层面。