Suppr超能文献

终末期镇静剂和镇静治疗:养老院回顾性队列研究。

Sedatives and sedation at the end of life: a nursing home retrospective cohort study.

机构信息

Department of Palliative Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany

Department of Palliative Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.

出版信息

BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2022 Dec;12(e6):e744-e747. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2019-001984. Epub 2019 Nov 28.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Sedatives are frequently used at the end of life in specialist palliative care. There is scarce information about their use in nursing homes. Therefore, we aimed to assess the use of (1) sedatives generally and (2) 'sedatives with continuous effect', based on objective operational criteria, within the last week of life in a nursing home.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of residents who died in a German nursing home between 1/2015 and 12/2017, using the nursing home's medical records, which contained drug sheets and nurses' notes. Sedatives analysed were those recommended by guidelines for 'palliative sedation': benzodiazepines, levomepromazine, haloperidol (≥5 mg/day) and propofol. Exploratory statistical analysis was conducted using R V.3.6.1.

RESULTS

46/165 (28%) deceased residents received a sedative during the last week of life, all without use of the term 'sedation'. 26/165 residents (16%) received 'sedatives with continuous effect', for median 4 days (range 1-7). Oral lorazepam was used most frequently, mainly for agitation, anxiety and dyspnoea, but also due to palliative status and patients wish. The median total daily dose of lorazepam within the last week of life was 1.5 mg (range 0.5-7.5). The term 'palliative' was significantly more often used for residents receiving sedatives (p=0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with published data on continuous deep sedation, moderate or deep sedation was less frequent in this nursing home and never labelled as 'sedation'. Multicentre mixed-methods research is needed to gain representative and more detailed data on sedation practices at the end of life in nursing homes.

摘要

目的

在专科姑息治疗中,临终患者经常使用镇静剂。关于疗养院中镇静剂使用的信息很少。因此,我们旨在根据客观操作标准评估(1)镇静剂的总体使用情况和(2)“具有持续作用的镇静剂”,在疗养院生命的最后一周内。

方法

这是一项回顾性队列研究,研究对象为 2015 年 1 月至 2017 年 12 月期间在德国一家疗养院死亡的居民,使用疗养院的病历,其中包含药物清单和护士记录。分析的镇静剂是指南推荐用于“姑息镇静”的镇静剂:苯二氮䓬类、左美丙嗪、氟哌啶醇(≥5mg/天)和丙泊酚。使用 R V.3.6.1 进行探索性统计分析。

结果

在生命的最后一周,46/165(28%)死亡的居民接受了镇静剂治疗,但均未使用“镇静”一词。165 名居民中有 26 名(16%)接受了“具有持续作用的镇静剂”,中位数为 4 天(范围 1-7 天)。口服劳拉西泮最常使用,主要用于治疗激越、焦虑和呼吸困难,但也用于姑息治疗和患者意愿。生命的最后一周内劳拉西泮的总日剂量中位数为 1.5mg(范围 0.5-7.5)。接受镇静剂的居民中“姑息”一词的使用明显更为频繁(p=0.001)。

结论

与发表的关于持续深度镇静的数据相比,该疗养院的中度或深度镇静频率较低,且从不标记为“镇静”。需要进行多中心混合方法研究,以获得疗养院临终镇静实践的代表性和更详细的数据。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验