Wikberg Eva C, Gonzalez Sofia, Rodriguez Cynthia, Sicotte Pascale
Department of Anthropology, University of Texas at San Antonio, Texas, USA.
Department of Anthropology and Archaeology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Am J Primatol. 2022 Feb;84(2):e23355. doi: 10.1002/ajp.23355. Epub 2021 Dec 20.
Cooperative home range defense is common in primates, despite a collective action problem that arises when group members benefit from winning the intergroup encounter regardless of whether they participate. The costs associated with this collective action problem may be mitigated by residing in small groups, residing with kin, or by forming strong bonds with group members. The potential to decouple the effects of these variables provided an opportunity to investigate which of these three variables best explains coparticipation in intergroup encounters among adult and subadult female colobus at Boabeng-Fiema, Ghana. Because males are often the main participants, we also investigated the relationship between female-female coparticipation and adult and subadult male participation. We collected intergroup behaviors from 94 adult and subadult individuals in eight groups during 1 year. We quantified female grooming bond strength and approach rates using focal samples. We classified female dyads as close kin (i.e., halfsiblings or more closely related) or nonkin based on partial pedigrees and genotypes generated from 17 STR loci. Female-female coparticipation was higher in dyads with stronger grooming bonds but was not associated with dyadic kinship, approach rate, or age class. Female coparticipation decreased with increasing female group size as expected if there is a collective action problem. Females coparticipated less in groups with more males and male intergroup aggression, possibly because there is less need for female-female cooperation if males are participating in the intergroup encounter. Females in smaller groups may not only benefit from increased female-female cooperation during intergroup encounters, they are also likely to reside with a higher-quality alpha male, both of which may increase the likelihood of winning intergroup encounters. There may be strong selection for facultative female dispersal in populations like the Boabeng-Fiema colobus in which small groups are associated with multiple benefits and cooperation is not affected by kinship.
合作性的家园范围防御在灵长类动物中很常见,尽管当群体成员无论是否参与都能从赢得群体间冲突中获益时会出现集体行动问题。与这种集体行动问题相关的成本可能会通过生活在小群体中、与亲属生活在一起或与群体成员建立紧密联系而得到缓解。分离这些变量影响的可能性提供了一个机会,来研究这三个变量中哪一个最能解释加纳博阿本 - 菲埃马成年和亚成年雌性疣猴在群体间冲突中的共同参与情况。由于雄性通常是主要参与者,我们还研究了雌性之间的共同参与与成年和亚成年雄性参与之间的关系。我们在1年时间里收集了8个群体中94只成年和亚成年个体的群体间行为。我们使用焦点样本量化了雌性之间的梳理毛发联系强度和接近率。我们根据从17个STR基因座生成的部分谱系和基因型,将雌性配对分类为近亲(即半同胞或亲缘关系更近)或非近亲。梳理毛发联系更强的配对中雌性之间的共同参与度更高,但与配对的亲属关系、接近率或年龄组无关。正如如果存在集体行动问题所预期的那样,随着雌性群体规模的增加,雌性之间的共同参与度下降。在雄性更多且雄性群体间攻击性更强的群体中,雌性之间的共同参与度更低,这可能是因为如果雄性参与群体间冲突,雌性之间合作的必要性就会降低。较小群体中的雌性不仅可能从群体间冲突中增加的雌性之间的合作中受益,她们也更有可能与更高质量的优势雄性生活在一起,这两者都可能增加赢得群体间冲突的可能性。对于像博阿本 - 菲埃马疣猴这样的种群,可能存在对雌性选择性扩散的强烈选择,在这些种群中,小群体与多种益处相关联,并且合作不受亲属关系的影响。