Member of the Australasian College for Emergency Medicine, Australia; Alice Springs Hospital, Gap Road, Alice Springs, Northern Territory, Australia.
Alice Springs Hospital, Gap Road, Alice Springs, Northern Territory, Australia.
Aust Crit Care. 2022 Nov;35(6):688-695. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2021.09.009. Epub 2021 Dec 17.
Obesity is a growing health problem worldwide. Morbid obesity has been associated with significant barriers to effective thoracic cage compression during cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
The BariBoard™ purports to improve adequacy of chest compressions in morbidly obese patients. This study uses a simulation model to evaluate this.
This was a prospective blinded randomised-controlled crossover pilot trial using a simulation model of obesity. Participants, recruited from hospital departments and prehospital services, performed 2 minutes of continuous compressions on mannequins modified to emulate a morbidly obese patient. Participants were randomised by coin toss to a sequence of either control/intervention or intervention/control, with the BariBoard™ in the intervention arm. Accelerometers measured chest wall movement during compressions. The primary endpoint was a composite measure of compression adequacy (rate, depth, and recoil). Secondary endpoints comprised the individual components of the composite outcome, as both dichotomous outcomes (adequate vs. inadequate) and continuous variables. All endpoints were adjusted for potential confounders.
Of 205 participants recruited, 201 were analysed. There was a significant difference in the primary outcome between the control and intervention arms (13.4% vs. 4.5%, respectively, p = 0.001) and between the control and intervention arms for the secondary endpoints of adequate compression depth (31.3% vs. 15.9%, p < 0.001) and recoil (63.7% vs. 41.3%, p < 0.001). After adjustment for confounders and interactions, there was no difference in overall efficacy (odds ratio: 0.62, 95% confidence interval: 0.20-1.90, p = 0.40).
This pilot study describes the successful assessment of a device using a simulation model of obesity. Within these constraints and after adjustment for confounders, use of the BariBoard ™ did not improve efficacy of chest compressions.
肥胖是全球日益严重的健康问题。病态肥胖与心肺复苏期间有效胸廓压缩的显著障碍有关。
BariBoard™据称可改善病态肥胖患者的胸部按压效果。本研究使用模拟模型对此进行评估。
这是一项前瞻性、盲法、随机对照交叉试验,使用肥胖模拟模型。参与者从医院科室和院前服务部门招募,在模拟病态肥胖患者的模型上进行 2 分钟的连续按压。参与者通过抛硬币随机分为对照组/干预组或干预组/对照组,干预组使用 BariBoard™。加速度计测量按压过程中的胸壁运动。主要终点是复合压缩效果的综合衡量标准(频率、深度和回弹)。次要终点包括复合结果的各个组成部分,包括二分类结果(充分与不充分)和连续变量。所有终点均根据潜在混杂因素进行调整。
在招募的 205 名参与者中,有 201 名进行了分析。在对照组和干预组之间,主要终点存在显著差异(分别为 13.4%和 4.5%,p=0.001),在对照组和干预组之间,充分压缩深度的次要终点(分别为 31.3%和 15.9%,p<0.001)和回弹(分别为 63.7%和 41.3%,p<0.001)也存在显著差异。在调整混杂因素和交互作用后,总体疗效无差异(比值比:0.62,95%置信区间:0.20-1.90,p=0.40)。
本试点研究描述了使用肥胖模拟模型成功评估设备的情况。在这些限制条件下,并在调整混杂因素后,使用 BariBoard ™ 并未提高胸部按压的效果。