• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

纽约州健康家园计划对糖尿病患者获得医疗服务的影响。

Impact of New York State's Health Home program on access to care among patients with diabetes.

机构信息

Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, New York, USA

Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, New York, USA.

出版信息

BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2021 Dec;9(Suppl 1). doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2021-002204.

DOI:10.1136/bmjdrc-2021-002204
PMID:34933873
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8679110/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Access to care is essential for patients with diabetes to maintain health and prevent complications, and is important for health equity. New York State's Health Homes (HHs) provide care management services to Medicaid-insured patients with chronic conditions, including diabetes, and aim to improve quality of care and outcomes. There is inconsistent evidence on the impact of HHs, and care management programs more broadly, on access to care.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Using a cohort of patients with diabetes derived from electronic health records from the INSIGHT Clinical Research Network, we analyzed Medicaid data for HH enrollees and a matched comparison group of HH non-enrollees. We estimated HH impacts on several access measures using natural experiment methods.

RESULTS

We identified and matched 11 646 HH enrollees; patients were largely non-Hispanic Black (29.9%) and Hispanic (48.7%), and had high rates of dual eligibility (33.0%), Supplemental Security Income disability enrollment (49.1%), and multiple comorbidities. In the 12 months following HH enrollment, HH enrollees had one more month of Medicaid coverage (p<0.001) and 4.6 more outpatient visits than expected (p<0.001, evenly distributed between primary and specialty care). There were also positive impacts on the proportions of patients with follow-up visits within 7 days (4 percentage points (pp), p<0.001) and 30 days (6pp, p<0.001) after inpatient care, and on the proportion of patients with follow-up visits within 30 days after emergency department (ED) care (4pp, p<0.001). We did not find meaningful differences in continuity of care. We found small positive impacts on the proportion of patients with an inpatient visit and the proportion with an ED visit.

CONCLUSIONS

New York State's HH program improved access to care for Medicaid recipients with diabetes. These findings have implications for New York State Medicaid as well as other providers and care management programs.

摘要

简介

患者获得医疗照护对于维持健康和预防并发症至关重要,这对医疗公平也很重要。纽约州的健康之家(HHs)为包括糖尿病在内的慢性病的医疗补助保险患者提供护理管理服务,旨在改善护理质量和结果。HHs 和更广泛的护理管理计划对获得医疗服务的影响证据不一。

研究设计和方法

我们利用 INSIGHT 临床研究网络的电子健康记录中的糖尿病患者队列,分析了 HHs 参保者和 HHs 非参保者匹配对照组的医疗补助数据。我们使用自然实验方法估计 HHs 对若干获得医疗服务指标的影响。

结果

我们确定并匹配了 11646 名 HHs 参保者;患者主要是非西班牙裔黑人(29.9%)和西班牙裔(48.7%),双重资格(33.0%)、补充保障收入残疾登记(49.1%)和多种合并症的比例很高。在 HHs 参保后的 12 个月内,HHs 参保者的医疗补助覆盖期多了一个月(p<0.001),门诊就诊次数多了 4.6 次(p<0.001,在初级保健和专科保健之间平均分配)。在门诊就诊后 7 天(4 个百分点(pp),p<0.001)和 30 天(6pp,p<0.001)内有后续就诊的患者比例、在住院后 30 天内有后续就诊的患者比例(4pp,p<0.001)以及在急诊科就诊后 30 天内有后续就诊的患者比例(4pp,p<0.001)也有积极影响。我们没有发现连续性护理方面的显著差异。我们发现,患者住院和急诊科就诊的比例略有增加。

结论

纽约州的 HHs 计划改善了医疗补助受助人中糖尿病患者获得医疗服务的机会。这些发现对纽约州医疗补助以及其他提供者和护理管理计划都有影响。

相似文献

1
Impact of New York State's Health Home program on access to care among patients with diabetes.纽约州健康家园计划对糖尿病患者获得医疗服务的影响。
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2021 Dec;9(Suppl 1). doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2021-002204.
2
Improved access and quality of care after enrollment in the New York State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP).加入纽约州儿童健康保险计划(SCHIP)后,医疗服务的可及性和质量得到改善。
Pediatrics. 2004 May;113(5):e395-404. doi: 10.1542/peds.113.5.e395.
3
The evolution of the State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) in New York: changing program features and enrollee characteristics.纽约州儿童健康保险计划(SCHIP)的发展:项目特征与参保人特点的变化
Pediatrics. 2003 Dec;112(6 Pt 2):e542.
4
Evaluation of children's health insurance: from New York State's CHild Health Plus to SCHIP.儿童健康保险评估:从纽约州的儿童健康附加保险到儿童健康保险计划
Pediatrics. 2000 Mar;105(3 Suppl E):687-91.
5
Evaluation of New York State's Child Health Plus: access, utilization, quality of health care, and health status.纽约州儿童健康增强计划评估:医疗服务的可及性、利用率、质量及健康状况
Pediatrics. 2000 Mar;105(3 Suppl E):711-8.
6
Effects of Medicaid Health Homes among people with substance use disorder and another chronic condition on health care utilization and spending: Lessons from New York State.医疗保险健康之家对患有物质使用障碍和另一种慢性疾病的人群的医疗保健利用和支出的影响:来自纽约州的经验教训。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2022 Jan;132:108503. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2021.108503. Epub 2021 May 29.
7
Evaluation of Medicaid managed care. Satisfaction, access, and use.医疗补助管理式医疗评估。满意度、可及性与使用情况。
JAMA. 1996 Jul 3;276(1):50-5.
8
Changes in Utilization and Health Among Low-Income Adults After Medicaid Expansion or Expanded Private Insurance.医疗补助扩大或扩大私人保险后,低收入成年人的利用和健康状况的变化。
JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Oct 1;176(10):1501-1509. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.4419.
9
Family income and the impact of a children's health insurance program on reported need for health services and unmet health need.家庭收入以及儿童健康保险计划对报告的医疗服务需求和未满足的医疗需求的影响。
Pediatrics. 2002 Feb;109(2):E29. doi: 10.1542/peds.109.2.e29.
10
The effect of expanded insurance coverage under the Affordable Care Act on emergency department utilization in New York.平价医疗法案扩大保险范围对纽约急诊部门利用的影响。
Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Oct;48:183-190. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.04.076. Epub 2021 Apr 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding Gaps in the Hypertension and Diabetes Care Cascade: Systematic Scoping Review.了解高血压和糖尿病护理级联中的差距:系统范围综述。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024 Feb 16;10:e51802. doi: 10.2196/51802.
2
Health Centers and Value-Based Payment: A Framework for Health Center Payment Reform and Early Experiences in Medicaid Value-Based Payment in Seven States.健康中心与基于价值的支付:健康中心支付改革框架及七个州医疗补助基于价值支付的早期经验
Milbank Q. 2022 Sep;100(3):879-917. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12580.

本文引用的文献

1
Primary medical care continuity and patient mortality: a systematic review.初级医疗保健的连续性与患者死亡率:一项系统评价。
Br J Gen Pract. 2020 Aug 27;70(698):e600-e611. doi: 10.3399/bjgp20X712289. Print 2020 Sep.
2
Health and health service usage outcomes of case management for patients with long-term conditions: a review of reviews.长期病患者个案管理的健康和健康服务使用结果:综述研究。
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2020 Aug 3;21:e26. doi: 10.1017/S1463423620000080.
3
Primary care visits increase utilization of evidence-based preventative health measures.初级保健就诊增加了基于证据的预防保健措施的利用。
BMC Fam Pract. 2020 Jul 28;21(1):151. doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-01216-8.
4
"Not Alone Anymore": The Experiences of Adults With Diabetes in New York's Medicaid Health Home Program.“不再孤单”:纽约医疗补助健康之家项目中成年糖尿病患者的经历
Med Care. 2020 Jun;58 Suppl 6 Suppl 1(Suppl 6 1):S60-S65. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001296.
5
11. Microvascular Complications and Foot Care: .11. 微血管并发症与足部护理:
Diabetes Care. 2020 Jan;43(Suppl 1):S135-S151. doi: 10.2337/dc20-S011.
6
6. Glycemic Targets: .6. 血糖目标: 。
Diabetes Care. 2020 Jan;43(Suppl 1):S66-S76. doi: 10.2337/dc20-S006.
7
1. Improving Care and Promoting Health in Populations: -.改善人群的医疗服务和促进健康:-。
Diabetes Care. 2020 Jan;43(Suppl 1):S7-S13. doi: 10.2337/dc20-S001.
8
Disability-Related Disparities in Access to Health Care Before (2008-2010) and After (2015-2017) the Affordable Care Act.《平价医疗法案》实施前后(2008-2010 年和 2015-2017 年),医疗保健获取方面的残疾相关差异。
Am J Public Health. 2019 Jul;109(7):1015-1021. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2019.305056. Epub 2019 May 16.
9
Outcomes of a Citywide Campaign to Reduce Medicaid Hospital Readmissions With Connection to Primary Care Within 7 Days of Hospital Discharge.全市范围内通过在出院后 7 天内与初级保健联系来减少医疗补助医院再入院的活动结果。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Jan 4;2(1):e187369. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.7369.
10
Matching and Regression to the Mean in Difference-in-Differences Analysis.双重差分分析中的匹配与均值回归
Health Serv Res. 2018 Dec;53(6):4138-4156. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12993. Epub 2018 Jun 29.