Suppr超能文献

促进高质量癌症护理:对澳大利亚主席关于多学科团队会议观点的定性研究

Facilitating High Quality Cancer Care: A Qualitative Study of Australian Chairpersons' Perspectives on Multidisciplinary Team Meetings.

作者信息

Fradgley Elizabeth A, Booth Kate, Paul Christine, Zdenkowski Nicholas, Rankin Nicole M

机构信息

School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.

Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

J Multidiscip Healthc. 2021 Dec 16;14:3429-3439. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S332972. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

AIM

Multidisciplinary team meetings (MDMs) are a critical element of quality care for people diagnosed with cancer. The MDM Chairperson plays a significant role in facilitating these meetings, which are often time-poor environments for clinical decision making. This study examines the perceptions of MDM Chairpersons including their role and the factors that determine the quality of a Chair, as well as the Chairperson's perception of the value of personally attending meetings.

METHODS

This qualitative study used telephone interviews to explore the experiences of MDM Chairpersons from metropolitan and regional New South Wales, Australia. Using a state-wide register, 43 clinicians who chaired lung, genitourinary, gastrointestinal, and breast cancer meetings were approached to participate. Thematic data analysis was used to develop and organise themes.

RESULTS

Themes from the 16 interviews identified the perceived need for an expert and efficient MDM Chairperson with emphasis on personal rather than technical skills. The remaining themes related to the benefits of meetings to ensure quality and consistency of care; improve inter-professional relationships; and provide communication with and reassurance for patients.

CONCLUSION

The role of the MDM Chairperson requires expert management and leadership skills to ensure meetings support quality patient-centred care. MDMs are perceived to provide multiple benefits to both clinicians and patients. Efforts to train Chairs and to maximise clinician and patient benefits may be warranted given the costly and time-consuming nature of MDMs.

摘要

目的

多学科团队会议(MDMs)是癌症确诊患者优质护理的关键要素。MDM主席在推动这些会议中发挥着重要作用,而这些会议往往是临床决策时间紧迫的环境。本研究考察了MDM主席的看法,包括他们的角色、决定主席素质的因素,以及主席对亲自参加会议价值的看法。

方法

这项定性研究通过电话访谈,探讨了来自澳大利亚新南威尔士州大都市和地区的MDM主席的经历。利用全州范围的登记册,联系了43位主持肺癌、泌尿生殖系统癌、胃肠道癌和乳腺癌会议的临床医生参与研究。采用主题数据分析来形成和组织主题。

结果

16次访谈的主题表明,人们认为需要一位专业且高效的MDM主席,重点在于个人技能而非技术技能。其余主题涉及会议的益处,包括确保护理质量和一致性、改善跨专业关系,以及为患者提供沟通和安慰。

结论

MDM主席的角色需要专业的管理和领导技能,以确保会议支持以患者为中心的优质护理。MDMs被认为对临床医生和患者都有多重益处。鉴于MDMs成本高昂且耗时,或许有必要努力培训主席,并最大限度地提高临床医生和患者的受益。

相似文献

1
Facilitating High Quality Cancer Care: A Qualitative Study of Australian Chairpersons' Perspectives on Multidisciplinary Team Meetings.
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2021 Dec 16;14:3429-3439. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S332972. eCollection 2021.
2
A study of the decision outcomes and financial costs of multidisciplinary team meetings (MDMs) in oncology.
Br J Cancer. 2013 Oct 29;109(9):2295-300. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2013.586. Epub 2013 Oct 1.
4
Optimising the quality of multidisciplinary team meetings: A narrative review.
Cancer Med. 2022 May;11(9):1965-1971. doi: 10.1002/cam4.4432. Epub 2022 Mar 7.
6
Cancer care decision making in multidisciplinary meetings.
Qual Health Res. 2015 Mar;25(3):397-407. doi: 10.1177/1049732314553010. Epub 2014 Oct 3.
7
Impact of multidisciplinary team meetings on the management of patients with breast cancer in a large private healthcare facility.
Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2024 Apr;20(2):285-291. doi: 10.1111/ajco.13947. Epub 2023 Feb 15.
8
Group decisions in oncology: doctors' perceptions of the legal responsibilities arising from multidisciplinary meetings.
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2008 Jun;52(3):287-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1673.2007.01916.x.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

2
Implementation of lung cancer multidisciplinary teams: a review of evidence-practice gaps.
Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2020 Aug;9(4):1667-1679. doi: 10.21037/tlcr.2019.11.32.
4
Multidisciplinary teams: perceptions of professionals and oncological patients.
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2020 Apr;66(4):419-423. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.66.4.419.
6
The impact of tumor board on cancer care: evidence from an umbrella review.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Jan 31;20(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-4930-3.
10
Consensus minimum data set for lung cancer multidisciplinary teams: Results of a Delphi process.
Respirology. 2018 Oct;23(10):927-934. doi: 10.1111/resp.13307. Epub 2018 Apr 11.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验