Suppr超能文献

多纤维增强复合桩对根管充填能力和粘结强度有影响吗?

Does Multi-Fiber-Reinforced Composite-Post Influence the Filling Ability and the Bond Strength in Root Canal?

作者信息

Kharouf Naji, Sauro Salvatore, Jmal Hamdi, Eid Ammar, Karrout Mohamed, Bahlouli Nadia, Haikel Youssef, Mancino Davide

机构信息

Department of Endodontics and Conservative Dentistry, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Strasbourg University, 67000 Strasbourg, France.

Department of Biomaterials and Bioengineering, INSERM UMR_S 1121, Strasbourg University, 67000 Strasbourg, France.

出版信息

Bioengineering (Basel). 2021 Nov 29;8(12):195. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering8120195.

Abstract

The purpose of the present in vitro study was to investigate the bond strength of root canal dentin and the filling ability of a new multi-fiber-reinforced composite post (mFRC) compared to a conventional single fiber-reinforced-composite post (sFRC). Twenty-eight freshly maxillary first permanent single-rooted premolars were instrumented and divided into groups ( = 14). Group 1: single-fiber-reinforced composite (sFRC), group 2: multi-fiber-reinforced composite (mFRC). Bonding procedures were performed using a dual-cure universal adhesive system and resin cement. All specimens were sectioned so that seven discs of 1 mm of thickness were obtained from each root. An optical microscope was used before the push-out test to measure the total area of the voids and to determine the length of the smaller/bigger circumferences. The push-out bond strength (PBS) test was performed using an Instron universal testing machine. Data were then compared by one-way ANOVA on ranks (α = 0.05). The dentin-cement-post interface was observed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). At the coronal third, a significantly higher bond strength ( < 0.05) was obtained in the sFRC group (44.7 ± 13.1 MPa) compared to the mFRC group (37.2 ± 9.2 MPa). No significant difference was detected between the groups at the middle third (sFRC group "33.7 ± 12.5 MPa" and mFRC group "32.6 ± 12.4 MPa") ( > 0.05). Voids were significantly lower in the mFRC compared to those observed in the sFRC group ( < 0.05) at the coronal third. Whereas, no significant difference was found at the middle third ( > 0.05) between the tested groups. Filling ability was overall improved when employing mFRC, although such technique might have characteristic limitations concerning the bond strength to dentin.

摘要

本体外研究的目的是调查根管牙本质的粘结强度以及一种新型多纤维增强复合桩(mFRC)与传统单纤维增强复合桩(sFRC)相比的充填能力。选取28颗新鲜拔除的上颌第一恒单根前磨牙进行根管预备并分为两组(每组n = 14)。第1组:单纤维增强复合材料(sFRC),第2组:多纤维增强复合材料(mFRC)。使用双固化通用粘结系统和树脂水门汀进行粘结操作。将所有标本进行切片,以便从每个牙根获得7个厚度为1 mm的薄片。在推出试验前,使用光学显微镜测量空隙的总面积,并确定较小/较大周长的长度。使用Instron万能试验机进行推出粘结强度(PBS)测试。然后通过秩和单向方差分析比较数据(α = 0.05)。使用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)观察牙本质-水门汀-桩界面。在冠方三分之一处,sFRC组(44.7±13.1 MPa)的粘结强度显著高于mFRC组(37.2±9.2 MPa)(P < 0.05)。在根中三分之一处,两组之间未检测到显著差异(sFRC组“33.7±12.5 MPa”,mFRC组“32.6±12.4 MPa”)(P > 0.05)。在冠方三分之一处,mFRC组的空隙明显低于sFRC组(P < 0.05)。然而,在根中三分之一处,测试组之间未发现显著差异(P > 0.05)。采用mFRC时,充填能力总体上有所提高,尽管该技术在与牙本质的粘结强度方面可能存在特定局限性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d20/8698466/135761b7a2f7/bioengineering-08-00195-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验