• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经导管主动脉瓣置换术在肥胖患者中的应用:经股动脉和经颈动脉入路的血管并发症。

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement in obese patients: procedural vascular complications with the trans-femoral and trans-carotid access routes.

机构信息

Quebec Heart & Lung Institute, Laval University, Quebec City, Canada.

Cardiovascular Institute, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2022 Jun 1;34(6):982-989. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivab354.

DOI:10.1093/icvts/ivab354
PMID:34942005
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9159419/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Obesity may increase the risk of vascular complications in transfemoral (TF) transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) procedures. The transcarotid (TC) approach has recently emerged as an alternative access in TAVR. We sought to compare vascular complications and early clinical outcomes in obese patients undergoing TAVR either by TF or TC vascular access.

METHODS

Multicentre registry including obese patients undergoing TF- or TC-TAVR in 15 tertiary centres. All patients received newer-generation transcatheter heart valves. For patients exhibiting unfavourable ileo-femoral anatomic characteristics, the TC approach was favoured in 3 centres with experience with it. A propensity score analysis was performed for overcoming unbalanced baseline covariates. The primary end point was the occurrence of in-hospital vascular complications (Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 criteria).

RESULTS

A total of 539 patients were included, 454 (84.2%) and 85 (15.8%) had a TF and TC access, respectively. In the propensity-adjusted cohort (TF: 442 patients; TC: 85 patients), both baseline and procedural valve-related characteristics were well-balanced between groups. A significant decrease in vascular complications was observed in the TC group (3.5% vs 12% in the TF group, odds ratio: 0.26, 95% CI: 0.07-0.95, P = 0.037). There were no statistically significant differences between groups regarding in-hospital mortality (TC: 2.8%, TF: 1.5%), stroke (TC: 1.2%, TF: 0.4%) and life-threatening/major bleeding events (TC: 2.8%, TF: 3.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with obesity undergoing TAVR with newer-generation devices, the TC access was associated with a lower rate of vascular complications. Larger randomized studies are warranted to further assess the better approach for TAVR in obese patients.

摘要

目的

肥胖可能增加经股(TF)经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)血管并发症的风险。经颈动脉(TC)入路最近已成为 TAVR 的另一种入路选择。我们旨在比较肥胖患者行经 TF 或 TC 血管入路 TAVR 的血管并发症和早期临床结局。

方法

该多中心注册研究纳入了在 15 家三级中心行经 TF 或 TC-TAVR 的肥胖患者。所有患者均接受了新一代经导管心脏瓣膜。对于存在不利的髂股解剖特征的患者,如果 3 家中心有经 TC 入路的经验,则倾向于选择 TC 入路。采用倾向评分分析来克服不平衡的基线协变量。主要终点是住院期间血管并发症的发生(瓣膜学术研究联合会-2 标准)。

结果

共纳入 539 例患者,其中 454 例(84.2%)和 85 例(15.8%)分别采用 TF 和 TC 入路。在倾向评分调整后的队列中(TF:442 例;TC:85 例),两组的基线和手术相关瓣膜特征均得到很好的平衡。TC 组血管并发症显著减少(3.5%比 TF 组的 12%,比值比:0.26,95%置信区间:0.07-0.95,P=0.037)。两组之间在住院期间死亡率(TC:2.8%,TF:1.5%)、卒中和危及生命/主要出血事件(TC:2.8%,TF:3.8%)方面无统计学差异。

结论

在接受新一代器械进行 TAVR 的肥胖患者中,TC 入路与较低的血管并发症发生率相关。需要更大规模的随机研究来进一步评估肥胖患者 TAVR 的更佳方法。

相似文献

1
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement in obese patients: procedural vascular complications with the trans-femoral and trans-carotid access routes.经导管主动脉瓣置换术在肥胖患者中的应用:经股动脉和经颈动脉入路的血管并发症。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2022 Jun 1;34(6):982-989. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivab354.
2
Comparable Outcomes for Transcarotid and Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement at a High Volume US Center.美国高容量医疗中心经颈动脉途径与经股动脉途径行经导管主动脉瓣置换术的可比结局。
Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022 Summer;34(2):467-474. doi: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2021.03.009. Epub 2021 Mar 10.
3
Carotid versus femoral access for transcatheter aortic valve replacement: comparable results in the current era.经导管主动脉瓣置换术经颈动脉与股动脉入路的比较:当前时代的可比结果。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021 Oct 22;60(4):874-879. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezab109.
4
Results of transcarotid compared with transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement.经颈动脉与经股动脉经导管主动脉瓣置换术的结果比较。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022 Jan;163(1):69-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.03.091. Epub 2020 Apr 13.
5
A meta-analysis of transcarotid versus transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement.经颈动脉与经股动脉经导管主动脉瓣置换术的荟萃分析。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Oct;98(4):767-773. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29768. Epub 2021 May 12.
6
Vascular access for transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A network meta-analysis.经导管主动脉瓣置换术的血管入路:一项网状荟萃分析。
J Cardiol. 2023 Oct;82(4):227-233. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2023.04.015. Epub 2023 Apr 26.
7
Transcervical approach versus transfemoral approach for transcatheter aortic valve replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术经心尖入路与经股动脉入路的比较。
Int J Cardiol. 2021 Mar 15;327:58-62. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.11.026. Epub 2020 Nov 24.
8
Trends in vascular complications and associated treatment strategies following transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement.经股动脉经导管主动脉瓣置换术后血管并发症的趋势及相关治疗策略。
J Vasc Surg. 2020 Oct;72(4):1313-1324.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.01.050. Epub 2020 Mar 10.
9
The Carotid Artery as a Preferred Alternative Access Route for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.颈动脉作为经导管主动脉瓣置换术的首选替代入路
Ann Thorac Surg. 2017 Aug;104(2):621-629. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.12.030. Epub 2017 Mar 6.
10
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Comparing Transfemoral, Transcarotid, and Transcaval Access.经导管主动脉瓣置换术:股动脉、颈动脉和腔静脉入路的比较。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2018 Oct;106(4):1105-1112. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.04.029. Epub 2018 Jun 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Propensity Matched Analysis of 14 French Suture- Versus Plug-Based Vascular Closure During Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR).经股动脉经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)中14例法国患者使用缝线与封堵器进行血管闭合的倾向匹配分析。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2025 Aug;106(2):918-925. doi: 10.1002/ccd.31626. Epub 2025 May 28.
2
Access Options for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术的入路选择
J Clin Med. 2025 Feb 28;14(5):1651. doi: 10.3390/jcm14051651.
3
Multiparametric Outcome Assessment After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation-A Systematic Review.

本文引用的文献

1
Efficacy and Safety of ProGlide Versus Prostar XL Vascular Closure Devices in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: The RISPEVA Registry.经导管主动脉瓣置换术中 ProGlide 与 Prostar XL 血管闭合装置的疗效和安全性:RISPEVA 注册研究。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Nov 3;9(21):e018042. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.018042. Epub 2020 Oct 24.
2
Femoral Versus Nonfemoral Subclavian/Carotid Arterial Access Route for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.股动脉与非股动脉锁骨下/颈动脉入路行经导管主动脉瓣置换术的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Oct 20;9(19):e017460. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.017460. Epub 2020 Sep 29.
3
经导管主动脉瓣植入术后的多参数结局评估——一项系统评价
J Clin Med. 2025 Feb 20;14(5):1426. doi: 10.3390/jcm14051426.
4
An Updated Comprehensive Review of Existing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Access.经导管主动脉瓣置换术入路的最新综合综述
J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2024 Oct;17(5):973-989. doi: 10.1007/s12265-024-10484-z. Epub 2024 Aug 26.
5
Obesity and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.肥胖与经导管主动脉瓣置换术
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2024 May 30;11(6):169. doi: 10.3390/jcdd11060169.
6
Trans-femoral versus trans-carotid access for transcatheter aortic valve replacement: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.经股动脉与经颈动脉入路行导管主动脉瓣置换术:一项更新的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Future Sci OA. 2024 May 15;10(1):FSO930. doi: 10.2144/fsoa-2023-0101. eCollection 2024.
7
A Meta-Analysis on the Impact of High BMI in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.高体重指数对经导管主动脉瓣置换术患者影响的荟萃分析
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2022 Nov 9;9(11):386. doi: 10.3390/jcdd9110386.
Obesity in adults: a clinical practice guideline.
成人肥胖:临床实践指南。
CMAJ. 2020 Aug 4;192(31):E875-E891. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.191707.
4
Results of transcarotid compared with transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement.经颈动脉与经股动脉经导管主动脉瓣置换术的结果比较。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022 Jan;163(1):69-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.03.091. Epub 2020 Apr 13.
5
Relationship of Body Mass Index With Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Results From the National Cardiovascular Data-STS/ACC TVT Registry.体重指数与经导管主动脉瓣置换术后结局的关系:来自全国心血管数据-STS/ACC TVT 登记处的结果。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2020 Jan;95(1):57-68. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2019.09.027.
6
Comparative Outcomes of Transcarotid and Transsubclavian Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.经颈动脉与锁骨下动脉经导管主动脉瓣置换术的对比结局。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2020 Jan;109(1):49-56. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.05.035. Epub 2019 Jul 4.
7
Outcomes Following Subclavian and Axillary Artery Access for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Society of the Thoracic Surgeons/American College of Cardiology TVT Registry Report.经锁骨下动脉和腋动脉入路行经导管主动脉瓣置换术的结局:胸外科医师学会/美国心脏病学会经导管主动脉瓣置换术注册研究报告。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Apr 8;12(7):662-669. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.01.219.
8
Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement with a Balloon-Expandable Valve in Low-Risk Patients.经皮球囊扩张式主动脉瓣置换术治疗低危患者。
N Engl J Med. 2019 May 2;380(18):1695-1705. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1814052. Epub 2019 Mar 16.
9
Transcarotid Compared With Other Alternative Access Routes for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.经颈动脉与其他替代入路行经导管主动脉瓣置换术的比较。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Nov;11(11):e006388. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.006388.
10
Comparison of Transcarotid vs. Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.经颈动脉与经股动脉经导管主动脉瓣植入术的比较。
Circ J. 2018 Sep 25;82(10):2518-2522. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-18-0530. Epub 2018 Aug 2.