Turyan Medvedovsky Anna, Haberman Dan, Ibrahimli Mahsati, Tonchev Ivaylo, Rashi Yonatan, Peretz Alona, Shimoni Sara, Tuvali Ortal, Danenberg Haim, Beeri Ronen, Shuvy Mony
The Jesselson Integrated Heart Center, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Shmu'el Bait St. 12, Jerusalem 9103102, Israel.
Kaplan Heart Center, Kaplan Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Pasternak St. P.O. Box 1, Rehovot 76100, Israel.
J Clin Med. 2021 Dec 13;10(24):5849. doi: 10.3390/jcm10245849.
The role of percutaneous mitral valve repair (PMVr) in management of high-risk patients with severe mitral regurgitation (MR) and acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) is undetermined. We screened all patients who underwent PMVr between October 2015 and March 2020. We evaluated immediate, 30-day, and 1-year outcomes in patients who underwent PMVr during hospitalization due to ADHF as compared to elective patients. From a cohort of 237 patients, we identified 46 patients (19.4%) with severe MR of either functional or degenerative etiology who underwent PMVr during index hospitalization due to ADHF, including 17 (37%) critically ill patients. Patients' mean age was 75.2 ± 9.8 years, 56% were males. There were no differences in background history between ADHF and elective patients. Patients with ADHF were at higher risk for surgery, reflected in higher mean EuroSCORE II, compared with elective patients. After PMVr, we observed higher 30-day mortality rate in ADHF patients as compared to the elective group (10.9% vs. 3.1%, respectively, = 0.042). One-year mortality rate was similar between the groups (21.7% vs. 17.9%, = 0.493). Clinical and echocardiographic follow-up showed improvement of NYHA functional class and sPAP reduction in both groups ((54 ± 15 mmHg to 50 ±15 in the elective group ( = 0.02), 58 ± 13 mmHg to 52 ± 12 in the ADHF group ( = 0.02)). PMVr could be an alternative option for treatment of patients with severe MR and ADHF.
经皮二尖瓣修复术(PMVr)在高危重度二尖瓣反流(MR)和急性失代偿性心力衰竭(ADHF)患者管理中的作用尚未确定。我们筛选了2015年10月至2020年3月期间接受PMVr的所有患者。我们评估了因ADHF住院期间接受PMVr的患者与择期手术患者的即刻、30天和1年结局。在237例患者队列中,我们确定了46例(19.4%)因功能性或退行性病因导致重度MR且因ADHF在首次住院期间接受PMVr的患者,其中包括17例(37%)危重症患者。患者的平均年龄为75.2±9.8岁,56%为男性。ADHF患者和择期手术患者的背景病史无差异。与择期手术患者相比,ADHF患者手术风险更高,表现为平均欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统(EuroSCORE)II更高。PMVr术后,我们观察到ADHF患者的30天死亡率高于择期手术组(分别为10.9%和3.1%,P = 0.042)。两组的1年死亡率相似(21.7%和17.9%,P = 0.493)。临床和超声心动图随访显示两组的纽约心脏协会(NYHA)功能分级均有改善,收缩期肺动脉压(sPAP)均降低(择期手术组从54±15 mmHg降至50±15 mmHg(P = 0.02),ADHF组从58±13 mmHg降至52±12 mmHg(P = 0.02))。PMVr可能是治疗重度MR和ADHF患者的一种替代选择。