Schumann Jannik, Johanns Ulrike, Ahmad-Nejad Parviz, Ghebremedhin Beniam, Woebker Gabriele
Center for Clinical and Translational Research (CCTR), Institute for Medical Laboratory Diagnostics, Helios University Hospital Wuppertal, Witten/Herdecke University, 42283 Wuppertal, Germany.
Clinic for Intensive Care Medicine, Helios University Hospital Wuppertal, Witten/Herdecke University, 42283 Wuppertal, Germany.
J Clin Med. 2021 Dec 15;10(24):5880. doi: 10.3390/jcm10245880.
The role of empirical therapy and time to first effective treatment, including the antimicrobial stewardship program, are decisive in patients presenting with bloodstream infections (BSI). The FilmArray Blood Culture Identification Panel (FA BCID 1.0) detects 24 bacterial and fungal pathogens as well as 3 resistance genes from positive blood cultures in approximately 70 min. In this paper, we evaluate the impact of the additional FA BCID analysis on the time to an optimal antimicrobial therapy and on the length of stay in the ICU, ICU mortality, and PCT level reduction. This retro-/prospective trial was conducted in BSI patients in the ICU at a German tertiary care hospital. A total of 179 individual patients with 200 episodes of BSI were included in the prospective intervention group, and 150 patients with 170 episodes of BSI in the retrospective control group. In the intervention group, BSI data were analyzed including the MALDI-TOF MS (matrix assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry) and FA BCID results from January 2019 to August 2020; the data from the control group, including the MALDI-TOF results, were collected retrospectively from the year 2018. The effective and appropriate antimicrobial regimen occurred in a median of 17 hours earlier in the intervention versus control group ( = 0.071). Furthermore, changes in the antimicrobial regimens of the intervention group that did not immediately lead to an optimal therapy occurred significantly earlier by a median of 24 hours ( = 0.029). Surrogate markers, indicating an earlier recovery of the patients from the intervention group, such as length of stay at the ICU, duration of mechanical ventilation, or an earlier reduction in PCT level, were not significantly affected. However, mortality did not differ between the patient groups. A postulated reduction of the antimicrobial therapy, in those cases in which coagulase-negative species were identified, did occur in the control group, but not in the intervention group ( = 0.041). The implementation of FA BCID into the laboratory workflow can improve patient care by optimizing antimicrobial regimen earlier in BSI patients as it provides rapid and accurate results for key pathogens associated with BSI, as well as important antimicrobial resistance markers, e.g., or .
经验性治疗的作用以及首次有效治疗的时间,包括抗菌药物管理计划,对于血流感染(BSI)患者来说至关重要。FilmArray血培养鉴定板(FA BCID 1.0)可在约70分钟内从阳性血培养物中检测出24种细菌和真菌病原体以及3种耐药基因。在本文中,我们评估了额外的FA BCID分析对达到最佳抗菌治疗时间、重症监护病房(ICU)住院时间、ICU死亡率和降钙素原(PCT)水平降低的影响。这项回顾性/前瞻性试验在德国一家三级护理医院的ICU中的BSI患者中进行。前瞻性干预组共纳入179例个体患者,发生200次BSI发作;回顾性对照组有150例患者,发生170次BSI发作。在干预组中,分析了2019年1月至2020年8月期间包括基质辅助激光解吸电离飞行时间质谱(MALDI-TOF MS)和FA BCID结果在内的BSI数据;对照组的数据,包括MALDI-TOF结果,是从2018年回顾性收集的。与对照组相比,干预组中有效且合适的抗菌方案的中位出现时间提前了17小时(P = 0.071)。此外,干预组中未立即导致最佳治疗的抗菌方案的改变中位提前了24小时,差异有统计学意义(P = 0.029)。表明干预组患者恢复更早的替代指标,如在ICU的住院时间、机械通气时间或PCT水平更早降低,并未受到显著影响。然而,两组患者的死亡率并无差异。在对照组中,确实发生了在鉴定出凝固酶阴性菌的情况下假定的抗菌治疗减少,但在干预组中未发生(P = 0.041)。将FA BCID纳入实验室工作流程可通过在BSI患者中更早优化抗菌方案来改善患者护理,因为它能为与BSI相关的关键病原体以及重要的抗菌耐药标志物(如mecA或KPC)提供快速准确的结果。