Jang Albert Youngwoo, Yu Jongwook, Oh Pyung Chun, Kim Minsu, Suh Soon Yong, Lee Kyounghoon, Han Seung Hwan, Kang Woong Chol
Cardiology, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon 21565, Korea.
Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, Korea.
J Clin Med. 2021 Dec 15;10(24):5898. doi: 10.3390/jcm10245898.
Biodegradable polymers (BDPs) and ultrathin struts were recently introduced to drug-eluting stents (DES) to further improve outcomes. In this study, we analyzed and compared the effect of the ultrathin strut BDP-DES (UBDP-DES) with the conventional durable polymer-DES (DP-DES) in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). A total of 356 STEMI patients (n = 160 in the UBDP-DES group and n = 196 in the DP-DES group) were enrolled. The primary endpoint was target lesion failure (TLF), including cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and ischemic-driven, target lesion revascularization (ID-TLR). The mean age was 60.3 ± 12.7 years (male 81.7%), and the median follow-up duration was 63.8 months. TLF was numerically more frequent in the UBDP-DES group (8.1% vs. 4.1%; HR 2.14; 95% CI 0.89-5.18; = 0.091). Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance discrepancies in the baseline characteristics due to patients in the UBDP-DES group initially having more unstable vital signs. However, after PSM (n = 116 in each group), there was no significant difference in TLF (5.3% vs. 5.3%; HR 1.04, 95% CI 0.34-3.22; = 0.947) or other secondary endpoints including ID-TLR. In the subgroup analysis, subjects with initial acute heart failure (AHF), defined as Killip class ≥ 3, were associated with 13.6% chance of 30-day mortality (9-fold of those without AHF), although chances of repeat revascularization were low (3.0%). Among patients with AHF, the UBDP-DES group was associated with a numerically higher chance of TLF compared with the DP-DES group. There was no difference in TLF between groups in patients without AHF. This study showed that UBDP-DES has long-term clinical outcomes similar to those of conventional DP-DES in real-world Korean STEMI patients receiving PPCI, especially in those without initial AHF.
可生物降解聚合物(BDP)和超薄支架最近被应用于药物洗脱支架(DES),以进一步改善治疗效果。在本研究中,我们分析并比较了超薄支架BDP-DES(UBDP-DES)与传统耐用聚合物DES(DP-DES)对接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PPCI)的ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者的影响。共纳入356例STEMI患者(UBDP-DES组160例,DP-DES组196例)。主要终点是靶病变失败(TLF),包括心源性死亡、靶血管心肌梗死和缺血驱动的靶病变血运重建(ID-TLR)。平均年龄为60.3±12.7岁(男性占81.7%),中位随访时间为63.8个月。UBDP-DES组的TLF在数值上更常见(8.1%对4.1%;HR 2.14;95%CI 0.89-5.18;P = 0.091)。进行倾向评分匹配(PSM)以平衡由于UBDP-DES组患者最初生命体征更不稳定导致的基线特征差异。然而,PSM后(每组116例),TLF(5.3%对5.3%;HR 1.04,95%CI 0.34-3.22;P = 0.947)或包括ID-TLR在内的其他次要终点无显著差异。在亚组分析中,初始急性心力衰竭(AHF)定义为Killip分级≥3级的受试者30天死亡率为13.6%(是无AHF者的9倍),尽管再次血运重建的几率较低(3.0%)。在AHF患者中,与DP-DES组相比,UBDP-DES组的TLF在数值上更高。无AHF患者组间TLF无差异。本研究表明,在接受PPCI的韩国现实世界STEMI患者中,UBDP-DES的长期临床结果与传统DP-DES相似,尤其是在无初始AHF的患者中。