Martínez-Sánchez Laura María, Parra-Martínez Cecilio, Martínez-García Tomás Eugenio, Martínez-García Concha
Department of Didactics of Physical, Plastic and Musical Education, Faculty of Education Sciences, University of Cádiz, 11519 Puerto Real, Spain.
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Experimental Sciences, University of Huelva, 21007 Huelva, Spain.
Foods. 2021 Dec 17;10(12):3134. doi: 10.3390/foods10123134.
Psychophysical methods allow us to measure the relationship between stimuli and sensory perception. Of these, Detection Threshold (DT) allows us to know the minimum concentration to produce taste identification. Given this, we wonder whether, for example, wine tasting experts are more capable of perceiving their sensory properties than other people, or whether they can distinguish them because they are better able to "describe" them. To verify this, this study analyses the influence of having prior knowledge of the name astringency and, failing that, to detect it and distinguish it between the four basic tastes. One-hundred-and-sixty-two university students with an average age of 19.43 (SD = 2.55) years were assigned to three experimental conditions: an experimental group (G.2) without previous knowledge of the name astringency and with alimentary satiety, and two control groups, both with previous knowledge of the name, these being G.1, with satiety, and G.3, with hunger. DT was collected for the four basic tastes and astringencies. Results showed significant differences in the identification of astringency, being the least identified experimental group with respect to the control groups. It is striking that G.2, without prior knowledge of the name, identified astringency as a bitter taste in most cases. This supports our hypothesis of the importance of attending to linguistic cognitive processes when psychophysically estimating taste in humans.
心理物理学方法使我们能够测量刺激与感官知觉之间的关系。其中,检测阈值(DT)使我们能够了解产生味觉识别的最低浓度。鉴于此,我们不禁要问,例如,品酒专家是否比其他人更能感知葡萄酒的感官特性,或者他们是否能够区分这些特性是因为他们更善于“描述”它们。为了验证这一点,本研究分析了事先知晓涩味名称的影响,若不知晓,则分析检测并区分它与四种基本味觉的能力。162名平均年龄为19.43岁(标准差=2.55)的大学生被分配到三种实验条件下:一个实验组(G.2),对涩味名称没有先验知识且处于饮食饱腹状态,以及两个对照组,这两组都知晓涩味名称,其中G.1处于饱腹状态,G.3处于饥饿状态。收集了四种基本味觉和涩味的检测阈值。结果显示,在涩味识别方面存在显著差异,实验组相对于对照组识别率最低。值得注意的是,G.2组在不知道名称的情况下,在大多数情况下将涩味识别为苦味。这支持了我们的假设,即在对人类味觉进行心理物理学评估时,关注语言认知过程非常重要。