• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多组分健康素养干预措施的共同制定,该措施针对轻度至重度慢性肾脏病患者和医疗保健专业人员。

Co-Creation of a Multi-Component Health Literacy Intervention Targeting Both Patients with Mild to Severe Chronic Kidney Disease and Health Care Professionals.

机构信息

Department of Health Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands.

Department of Nephrology, University Medical Center Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 18;18(24):13354. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182413354.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph182413354
PMID:34948960
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8704507/
Abstract

Limited health literacy (LHL) is common in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients and frequently associated with worse self-management. Multi-component interventions targeted at patients and healthcare professionals (HCPs) are recommended, but evidence is limited. Therefore, this study aims to determine the objectives and strategies of such an intervention, and to develop, produce and evaluate it. For this purpose, we included CKD patients with LHL ( = 19), HCPs ( = 15), educators ( = 3) and students ( = 4) from general practices, nephrology clinics and universities in an Intervention Mapping (IM) process. The determined intervention objectives especially address the patients' competences in maintaining self-management in the long term, and communication competences of patients and HCPs. Patients preferred visual strategies and strategies supporting discussion of needs and barriers during consultations to written and digital strategies. Moreover, they preferred an individual approach to group meetings. We produced a four-component intervention, consisting of a visually attractive website and topic-based brochures, consultation cards for patients, and training on LHL for HCPs. Evaluation revealed that the intervention was useful, comprehensible and fitting for patients' needs. Healthcare organizations need to use visual strategies more in patient education, be careful with digitalization and group meetings, and train HCPs to improve care for patients with LHL. Large-scale research on the effectiveness of similar HL interventions is needed.

摘要

健康素养有限(LHL)在慢性肾脏病(CKD)患者中很常见,并且常常与自我管理不善有关。建议针对患者和医疗保健专业人员(HCP)的多组分干预措施,但证据有限。因此,本研究旨在确定此类干预措施的目标和策略,并开发,生产和评估它。为此,我们将来自普通实践,肾脏病诊所和大学的患有 LHL 的 CKD 患者(= 19),HCP(= 15),教育者(= 3)和学生(= 4)纳入干预映射(IM)过程。确定的干预目标特别针对患者在长期内维持自我管理的能力以及患者和 HCP 的沟通能力。患者更喜欢视觉策略和在咨询中支持讨论需求和障碍的策略,而不是书面和数字策略。此外,他们更喜欢针对个人的小组会议。我们制作了一个由四部分组成的干预措施,包括一个具有吸引力的网站和基于主题的小册子,患者咨询卡以及针对 HCP 的 LHL 培训。评估结果表明,该干预措施非常有用,易于理解,并且符合患者的需求。医疗保健组织在患者教育中需要更多地使用视觉策略,小心数字化和小组会议,并培训 HCP 以改善对 LHL 患者的护理。需要对类似 HL 干预措施的有效性进行大规模研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a9a7/8704507/922f9507d9ad/ijerph-18-13354-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a9a7/8704507/9274785b76f5/ijerph-18-13354-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a9a7/8704507/922f9507d9ad/ijerph-18-13354-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a9a7/8704507/9274785b76f5/ijerph-18-13354-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a9a7/8704507/922f9507d9ad/ijerph-18-13354-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Co-Creation of a Multi-Component Health Literacy Intervention Targeting Both Patients with Mild to Severe Chronic Kidney Disease and Health Care Professionals.多组分健康素养干预措施的共同制定,该措施针对轻度至重度慢性肾脏病患者和医疗保健专业人员。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 18;18(24):13354. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182413354.
2
A longitudinal qualitative study to explore and optimize self-management in mild to end stage chronic kidney disease patients with limited health literacy: Perspectives of patients and health care professionals.一项旨在探索和优化轻度至终末期慢性肾脏病患者有限健康素养自我管理的纵向定性研究:患者和医疗保健专业人员的观点。
Patient Educ Couns. 2022 Jan;105(1):88-104. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.05.016. Epub 2021 May 13.
3
Digital tools/eHealth to support CKD self-management: A qualitative study of perceptions, attitudes and needs of patients and health care professionals in China.数字工具/电子健康支持慢性肾脏病自我管理:对中国患者和医疗保健专业人员的认知、态度和需求的定性研究。
Int J Med Inform. 2022 Sep;165:104811. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104811. Epub 2022 Jun 10.
4
Factors Affecting Health Literacy as Related to Asthma and COPD Management: Learning from Patient and Health Care Professional Viewpoints.影响哮喘和 COPD 管理的健康素养因素:从患者和医疗保健专业人员的观点中学习。
Health Lit Res Pract. 2021 Jul;5(3):e179-e193. doi: 10.3928/24748307-20210526-01. Epub 2021 Jul 15.
5
Exploring patients' and health professionals' perspectives on health literacy needs in the context of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.探讨慢性阻塞性肺疾病背景下患者和卫生专业人员对健康素养需求的看法。
Chronic Illn. 2022 Sep;18(3):549-561. doi: 10.1177/1742395321999441. Epub 2021 Mar 11.
6
Communication and shared decision-making with patients with limited health literacy; helpful strategies, barriers and suggestions for improvement reported by hospital-based palliative care providers.与健康素养有限的患者进行沟通和共同决策;医院姑息治疗提供者报告的有用策略、障碍和改进建议。
PLoS One. 2020 Jun 19;15(6):e0234926. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234926. eCollection 2020.
7
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
8
Considering health literacy in cardiovascular disease management: a qualitative study on healthcare professionals' and patients' perspectives.考虑到心血管疾病管理中的健康素养:一项关于医疗保健专业人员和患者观点的定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Sep 5;22(1):1121. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08455-8.
9
Patients' Health Literacy in Rehabilitation: Comparison between the Estimation of Patients and Health Care Professionals.患者康复健康素养:患者和医疗保健专业人员估计值的比较。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 16;19(6):3522. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063522.
10
How to tackle health literacy problems in chronic kidney disease patients? A systematic review to identify promising intervention targets and strategies.如何解决慢性肾病患者的健康素养问题?一项旨在确定有前景的干预目标和策略的系统综述。
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2020 Dec 22;36(7):1207-21. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfaa273.

引用本文的文献

1
The effectiveness of a health literacy enhancement program on knowledge, self-management behaviors, and clinical outcomes in people with chronic kidney disease: A quasi-experimental study in Thailand.一项健康素养提升项目对慢性肾脏病患者知识、自我管理行为及临床结局的有效性:泰国的一项准实验研究。
Belitung Nurs J. 2024 Nov 24;10(6):635-643. doi: 10.33546/bnj.3519. eCollection 2024.
2
Effectiveness of a health literacy intervention targeting both chronic kidney disease patients and health care professionals in primary and secondary care: a quasi-experimental study.一项针对初级和二级医疗保健机构中慢性肾病患者及医护人员的健康素养干预措施的效果:一项准实验研究。
J Nephrol. 2024 Dec;37(9):2621-2633. doi: 10.1007/s40620-024-02058-8. Epub 2024 Oct 4.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Intervening on health literacy by knowledge translation processes in kidney transplantation: A feasibility study.通过知识转化过程干预肾脏移植中的健康素养:一项可行性研究。
J Ren Care. 2022 Mar;48(1):60-68. doi: 10.1111/jorc.12379. Epub 2021 May 30.
2
A longitudinal qualitative study to explore and optimize self-management in mild to end stage chronic kidney disease patients with limited health literacy: Perspectives of patients and health care professionals.一项旨在探索和优化轻度至终末期慢性肾脏病患者有限健康素养自我管理的纵向定性研究:患者和医疗保健专业人员的观点。
Patient Educ Couns. 2022 Jan;105(1):88-104. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.05.016. Epub 2021 May 13.
3
What Are the Best Practices for Co-Creating Patient-Facing Educational Materials? A Scoping Review of the Literature.共同创建面向患者的教育材料的最佳实践有哪些?文献综述
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Sep 23;11(19):2615. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11192615.
4
Low Health Literacy Is Associated with Poorer Physical and Mental Health-Related Quality of Life in Dialysed Patients.低健康素养与透析患者较差的身心健康相关生活质量相关。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 14;19(20):13265. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192013265.
How to tackle health literacy problems in chronic kidney disease patients? A systematic review to identify promising intervention targets and strategies.
如何解决慢性肾病患者的健康素养问题?一项旨在确定有前景的干预目标和策略的系统综述。
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2020 Dec 22;36(7):1207-21. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfaa273.
4
Supporting patients to be involved in decisions about their health and care: Development of a best practice health literacy App for Australian adults living with Chronic Kidney Disease.支持患者参与自身健康和护理决策:为澳大利亚慢性肾病成年患者开发最佳实践健康素养应用程序。
Health Promot J Austr. 2021 Feb;32 Suppl 1:115-127. doi: 10.1002/hpja.416. Epub 2020 Oct 19.
5
Use of a Supportive Kidney Care Video Decision Aid in Older Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial.使用支持性肾脏护理视频决策辅助工具对老年患者的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Am J Nephrol. 2020;51(9):736-744. doi: 10.1159/000509711. Epub 2020 Aug 13.
6
Patient Perspectives to Inform a Health Literacy Educational Program: A Systematic Review and Thematic Synthesis of Qualitative Studies.从患者视角出发的健康素养教育项目:系统评价和定性研究的主题综合分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Nov 5;16(21):4300. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16214300.
7
Positive Outcomes of a Comprehensive Health Literacy Communication Training for Health Professionals in Three European Countries: A Multi-centre Pre-post Intervention Study.三项欧洲国家健康专业人员综合健康素养沟通培训的积极成果:一项多中心前后干预研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Oct 15;16(20):3923. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16203923.
8
Quality of Life after Dietary Self-Management Intervention for Persons with Early Stage CKD.早期慢性肾脏病患者饮食自我管理干预后的生活质量
Nephrol Nurs J. 2019 Jan-Feb;46(1):23-47.
9
Assessing the link between modified 'Teach Back' method and improvement in knowledge of the medical regimen among youth with kidney transplants: The application of digital media.评估改良的“回授教学法”与提高肾移植青少年对医疗方案认知之间的关联:数字媒体的应用。
Patient Educ Couns. 2019 May;102(5):1035-1039. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.12.007. Epub 2018 Dec 12.
10
Health Behaviors in Younger and Older Adults With CKD: Results From the CRIC Study.慢性肾脏病患者中青年与老年人群的健康行为:慢性肾脏病研究协作组(CRIC)研究结果
Kidney Int Rep. 2018 Sep 17;4(1):80-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2018.09.003. eCollection 2019 Jan.