• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

光学相干断层扫描指导下的镁生物可吸收支架在 NSTEMI 患者中的植入。

Optical Coherence Tomography- Versus Angiography-Guided Magnesium Bioresorbable Scaffold Implantation in NSTEMI Patients.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.

Department of Cardiology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.

出版信息

Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2022 Jul;40:101-110. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2021.12.003. Epub 2021 Dec 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.carrev.2021.12.003
PMID:34949544
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The purpose of a bioresorbable scaffold (BRS) is to provide radial support during coronary healing. In this study, coronary artery healing after optical coherence tomography (OCT)- versus angiography-guided magnesium BRS (MBRS) implantation in patients with non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) is compared.

METHODS

75 patients were randomized 1:1 to OCT- or angiography-guided implantation of a MBRS with protocolled pre- and post-dilation. In the OCT-guided group, prespecified criteria indicating additional intervention were (1) scaffold under-expansion, (2) strut malapposition, (3) edge dissection, and (4) residual stenosis at distal or proximal reference segments. The primary endpoint was OCT-derived healing stage at 6 months.

RESULTS

At 6 months, there was no difference in average healing stage between OCT- and angiography-guided intervention (4.6 [interquartile range (IQR): 4.5-4.7] versus 4.5 [IQR: 4.3-4.7]; p = 0.54). The MBRSs were completely resolved in 77.0% [IQR: 68.5-85.5] versus 76.5% [IQR: 67.9-85.5]; (p = 0.97). Minimal lumen area (MLA) was reduced at 6 months in both the OCT- (32.3%; p < 0.01) and the angiography-guided group (21.3%; p < 0.01), however OCT-guided implantation was associated with a greater reduction of total lumen volume (-27.1 ± 32.5 mm versus -5.0 ± 32.9 mm; p < 0.01) and MLA (-2.3 ± 1.6 mm vs. -1.4 ± 1.4 mm; p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

In NSTEMI patients, OCT-guidance with protocolled pre- and post-dilation of MBRS implantation showed similar healing pattern at 6 months compared to angiography-guidance alone.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

The Coronary Artery Healing Process after Optical Coherence Tomography Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with Magmaris Bioresorbable Scaffold in Patients with Non-ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: (HONEST) trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03016624.

摘要

背景

生物可吸收支架(BRS)的目的是在冠状动脉愈合期间提供径向支撑。在这项研究中,比较了光学相干断层扫描(OCT)指导下与血管造影指导下镁基生物可吸收支架(MBRS)植入治疗非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(NSTEMI)患者的冠状动脉愈合情况。

方法

75 例患者按 1:1 随机分为 OCT 或血管造影指导下植入 MBRS,并进行预设的预扩张和后扩张。在 OCT 指导组中,存在以下指定标准时需进行额外干预:(1)支架扩张不足,(2)支架贴壁不良,(3)边缘夹层,(4)远端或近端参考节段存在残余狭窄。主要终点是 6 个月时 OCT 检测到的愈合阶段。

结果

6 个月时,OCT 指导与血管造影指导干预的平均愈合阶段无差异(4.6 [四分位距(IQR):4.5-4.7] 与 4.5 [IQR:4.3-4.7];p=0.54)。MBRS 完全降解的比例分别为 77.0% [IQR:68.5-85.5] 和 76.5% [IQR:67.9-85.5];(p=0.97)。6 个月时 OCT 组(32.3%;p<0.01)和血管造影组(21.3%;p<0.01)的最小管腔面积(MLA)均减小,但 OCT 指导植入与总管腔体积减少(-27.1±32.5mm 与-5.0±32.9mm;p<0.01)和 MLA 减少(-2.3±1.6mm 与-1.4±1.4mm;p=0.02)更相关。

结论

在 NSTEMI 患者中,与单独血管造影指导相比,OCT 指导并采用预设预扩张和后扩张方案植入 MBRS 在 6 个月时显示出相似的愈合模式。

临床试验注册

光学相干断层扫描指导下经皮冠状动脉介入治疗非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者应用 Magmaris 生物可吸收支架后冠状动脉愈合过程(HONEST)试验在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册,NCT03016624。

相似文献

1
Optical Coherence Tomography- Versus Angiography-Guided Magnesium Bioresorbable Scaffold Implantation in NSTEMI Patients.光学相干断层扫描指导下的镁生物可吸收支架在 NSTEMI 患者中的植入。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2022 Jul;40:101-110. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2021.12.003. Epub 2021 Dec 15.
2
Coronary Artery Healing Process after Bioresorbable Scaffold in Patients with Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Rationale, Design, and Methodology of the HONEST Study.生物可吸收支架治疗非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者的冠状动脉愈合过程:HONEST 研究的原理、设计和方法。
Cardiology. 2021;146(2):161-171. doi: 10.1159/000512417. Epub 2021 Feb 1.
3
Optical Coherence Tomography Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Nobori Stent Implantation in Patients With Non-ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (OCTACS) Trial: Difference in Strut Coverage and Dynamic Malapposition Patterns at 6 Months.光学相干断层扫描指导下非ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者使用Nobori支架植入的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(OCTACS)试验:6个月时支架小梁覆盖率及动态贴壁不良模式的差异
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Aug;8(8):e002446. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.114.002446.
4
Impact of strut thickness on acute mechanical performance: A comparison study using optical coherence tomography between DESolve 150 and DESolve 100.支架厚度对急性机械性能的影响:DESolve 150 和 DESolve 100 的光学相干断层扫描对比研究。
Int J Cardiol. 2017 Nov 1;246:74-79. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.05.087. Epub 2017 May 24.
5
Effect of Post-Dilatation Following Primary PCI With Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Scaffold Versus Everolimus-Eluting Metallic Stent Implantation: An Angiographic and Optical Coherence Tomography TROFI II Substudy.药物洗脱生物可吸收支架与药物洗脱金属支架在直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后后扩张的效果:TROFI II 血管造影和光学相干断层成像亚研究。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Sep 25;10(18):1867-1877. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.07.035.
6
Optical Coherence Tomography to Optimize Results of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Non-ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome: Results of the Multicenter, Randomized DOCTORS Study (Does Optical Coherence Tomography Optimize Results of Stenting).光学相干断层成像术优化非 ST 段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的结果:多中心、随机 DOCTORS 研究的结果(光学相干断层成像术是否优化支架置入术的结果)。
Circulation. 2016 Sep 27;134(13):906-17. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.024393. Epub 2016 Aug 29.
7
Implantation of bioresorbable scaffolds under guidance of optical coherence tomography: Feasibility and pilot clinical results of a systematic protocol.光学相干断层扫描引导下生物可吸收支架植入:一项系统方案的可行性及初步临床结果
Cardiol J. 2018;25(4):443-458. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2018.0055. Epub 2018 May 18.
8
A 12-month angiographic and optical coherence tomography follow-up after bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者植入生物可吸收血管支架后12个月的血管造影和光学相干断层扫描随访
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Oct;86(4):E180-9. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26006. Epub 2015 May 25.
9
Second generation, sirolimus-eluting, bioresorbable Tyrocore scaffold implantation in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: Baseline OCT and 30-day clinical outcomes - A FANTOM STEMI pilot study.二代依维莫司洗脱、生物可吸收 Tyrocore 支架在 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者中的植入:基线 OCT 和 30 天临床结局——一项 FANTOM STEMI 先导研究。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Jul;96(1):E1-E7. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28414. Epub 2019 Jul 25.
10
Optical Coherence Tomography for Coronary Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold Implantation: A Randomized Controlled Trial.光学相干断层扫描在冠状动脉生物可吸收血管支架植入术中的应用:一项随机对照试验。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Jan;13(1):e008383. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.119.008383. Epub 2020 Jan 9.

引用本文的文献

1
When Functional Assessment Meets Intravascular Imaging in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease.当功能评估与冠状动脉疾病患者的血管内成像相遇时。
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2025 Aug 20;12(8):319. doi: 10.3390/jcdd12080319.
2
Comparison of intravascular imaging, physiological assessment and angiography for coronary revascularization in acute coronary syndrome: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.急性冠状动脉综合征中冠状动脉血运重建的血管内成像、生理评估与血管造影比较:一项系统评价与网状Meta分析
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025 Jul 21;12:1604050. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1604050. eCollection 2025.
3
Optical coherence tomography-guided . coronary angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
光学相干断层扫描引导的. 冠状动脉造影引导的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。 (备注:原文中“Optical coherence tomography-guided.”后面的“.”可能有误,影响准确理解)
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2025 Mar 3;15(3):2246-2257. doi: 10.21037/qims-24-1628. Epub 2025 Feb 26.
4
Optimal Predilatation Treatment Before Implantation of a Magmaris Bioresorbable Scaffold in Coronary Artery Stenosis: The OPTIMIS Trial.冠状动脉狭窄患者植入Magmaris生物可吸收支架前的最佳预扩张治疗:OPTIMIS试验
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2025 Jan;18(1):e014665. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.124.014665. Epub 2025 Jan 21.
5
Intravascular imaging-guided versus angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.血管内成像指导与血管造影指导的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:随机对照试验的系统评价和贝叶斯网状荟萃分析。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2024 Sep 11;24(1):483. doi: 10.1186/s12872-024-04105-5.
6
Optical coherence tomography (OCT) - versus angiography-guided strategy for percutaneous coronary intervention: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.光学相干断层扫描(OCT)与血管造影引导的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗策略:随机试验的荟萃分析。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2024 May 20;24(1):262. doi: 10.1186/s12872-024-03930-y.
7
Optimal lesion preparation before implantation of a Magmaris bioresorbable scaffold in patients with coronary artery stenosis: Rationale, design and methodology of the OPTIMIS study.冠状动脉狭窄患者植入Magmaris生物可吸收支架前的最佳病变准备:OPTIMIS研究的原理、设计与方法
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2024 Feb 7;38:101260. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2024.101260. eCollection 2024 Apr.
8
One- and two-year clinical outcomes of treatment with resorbable magnesium scaffolds for coronary artery disease: the prospective, international, multicentre BIOSOLVE-IV registry.可吸收镁支架治疗冠状动脉疾病的一年和两年临床结果:前瞻性、国际、多中心 BIOSOLVE-IV 注册研究。
EuroIntervention. 2023 Jun 19;19(3):232-239. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-22-01069.