Department of Social Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Department of Philosophy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Lab Anim (NY). 2022 Jan;51(1):22-35. doi: 10.1038/s41684-021-00890-0. Epub 2021 Dec 23.
This national survey aimed to identify how biomedical researchers using vertebrate animals viewed issues of significance for translational science, including oversight and public engagement, and to analyze how researcher characteristics and animal model choice correlate with those views. Responses from 1,187 researchers showed awareness of, and concerns about, problems of translation, reproducibility and rigor. Surveyed scientists were nevertheless optimistic about the value of animal studies, were favorable about research oversight and reported openness with non-scientists in discussing their animal work. Differences in survey responses among researchers also point to diverse perspectives within the animal research community on these matters. Most significant was variability associated with the primary type of animal that surveyed scientists used in their work. Other significant divergence in opinion appeared on the basis of professional role factors, including the type of degree held, workplace setting, type of funding, experience on an institutional animal care and use committee and personal demographic characteristics of age and gender.
这项全国性调查旨在确定使用脊椎动物进行生物医学研究的研究人员如何看待转化科学的重要问题,包括监督和公众参与,并分析研究人员的特征和动物模型选择如何与这些观点相关。来自 1187 名研究人员的回应表明他们意识到了翻译、可重复性和严谨性方面的问题,并对此表示关注。然而,接受调查的科学家对动物研究的价值持乐观态度,对研究监督持赞成态度,并报告说他们愿意与非科学家讨论他们的动物工作。研究人员在调查答复中的差异也表明,动物研究界在这些问题上存在不同的观点。最重要的是,与研究人员在工作中使用的主要动物类型相关的可变性。根据专业角色因素,包括所持有学位的类型、工作场所设置、资金类型、在机构动物护理和使用委员会的经验以及年龄和性别等个人人口统计学特征,也出现了其他显著的意见分歧。