Chantal BIYA International Reference Centre for Research on HIV/AIDS Prevention and Management (CIRCB), Yaoundé, Cameroon.
Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Buea, Buea, Cameroon.
HIV Med. 2022 Jul;23(6):629-638. doi: 10.1111/hiv.13220. Epub 2021 Dec 23.
Globally, HIV-related adolescent deaths have increased about 50%, especially for those who are vertically infected. This could be driven by archived drug resistance mutations (DRMs) as children grow up, which might jeopardize antiretroviral therapy (ART). Our objective was to compare HIV-1 genotypic variation between plasma RNA and proviral DNA of vertically infected adolescents (aged 10-19 years) failing ART.
A comparative study was conducted in 2019 among 296 adolescents with perinatal HIV infection (ALPHI) failing ART in health facilities of the Centre Region of Cameroon. The WHO clinical stage, CD4 count and plasma viral load (PVL) were measured. For those failing ART (PVL ≥ 1000 copies/mL), RNA (plasma) and proviral DNA (buffy coat) were sequenced in the pol gene at Chantal BIYA International Reference Centre (CIRCB), Yaoundé, Cameroon. HIV-1 subtypes and DRMs were interpreted using Stanford HIVdb v.8.8 and MEGA-X.
Of the 30% (89/296) failing ART, 81 had both RNA and DNA sequences generated and three were excluded for APOBEC mutations: the mean age was 16 ± 3 years; female-to-male ratio was 3:5; median PVL was 46 856 copies/mL [interquartile range (IQR): 19 898-271 410]; median CD4 count was 264 cells/μL (IQR: 131-574); and 42% were at WHO clinical stage 3/4. Subtype concordance between RNA and DNA viral strains was 100%, with CRF02_AG being predominant (65%) and two potential new recombinants found (A1/G/K; F1/G). Adolescents with DRMs were significantly higher in plasma than in proviral DNA (92% vs. 86%, p < 0.0001). Prevalent DRMs by drug class (RNA vs. DNA respectively) were at position M184 (74% vs. 67%) for nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs), K103 (63% vs. 59%) for non-NRTIs, and V82, L76 and M46 (2% vs. 2%) for protease inhibitors. A total of 35% (27/78) of adolescents had concordant DRM profiles in RNA and DNA, while 27% (21/78) had DRMs only in proviral DNA. The presence of archived DRMs was associated with advanced clinical stage 3/4 (OR = 0.14, p = 0.0003) and PVL < 5 Log (Copies/mL) (OR: 4.88, p = 0.006).
Although plasma RNA remains more sensitive for detecting HIV-1 DRMs, about a quarter of ALPHI experiencing ART failure in an African setting might have archived DRMs in viral reservoirs, indicating clinically occult resistance. Thus, to ensure effective ART success, proviral DNA profiling (alongside RNA genotyping) would provide additional DRMs for adolescents with advanced clinical stages and/or moderate PVL.
在全球范围内,与艾滋病毒相关的青少年死亡人数增加了约 50%,尤其是那些垂直感染的人。这可能是由于儿童成长过程中存档的耐药突变(DRMs)驱动的,这可能危及抗逆转录病毒治疗(ART)。我们的目的是比较在喀麦隆中心地区的医疗机构中接受 ART 治疗失败的垂直感染青少年(10-19 岁)的血浆 RNA 和前病毒 DNA 中的 HIV-1 基因型变异。
2019 年在喀麦隆雅温得的 Chantal BIYA 国际参考中心(CIRCB)对 296 名接受 ART 治疗失败的围产期 HIV 感染(ALPHI)青少年进行了一项比较研究。测量了 WHO 临床分期、CD4 计数和血浆病毒载量(PVL)。对于那些接受 ART 治疗失败的患者(PVL≥1000 拷贝/mL),在喀麦隆中心地区的医疗机构中的 Chantal BIYA 国际参考中心(CIRCB)对 pol 基因的 RNA(血浆)和前病毒 DNA(血斑)进行了测序。使用斯坦福 HIVdb v.8.8 和 MEGA-X 解释 HIV-1 亚型和 DRMs。
在接受 ART 治疗失败的 30%(89/296)的患者中,有 81 例同时生成了 RNA 和 DNA 序列,有 3 例因 APOBEC 突变而被排除在外:平均年龄为 16±3 岁;女性与男性的比例为 3:5;中位 PVL 为 46856 拷贝/mL[四分位间距(IQR):19898-271410];中位 CD4 计数为 264 个细胞/μL(IQR:131-574);42%处于 WHO 临床分期 3/4 期。RNA 和 DNA 病毒株之间的亚型一致性为 100%,以 CRF02_AG 为主(65%),发现了两种潜在的新重组体(A1/G/K;F1/G)。在血浆中发现的 DRMs 明显高于前病毒 DNA(92% vs. 86%,p<0.0001)。按药物类别(分别为 RNA 与 DNA)的常见 DRMs 为 M184(74% vs. 67%)的核苷逆转录酶抑制剂(NRTIs)、K103(63% vs. 59%)的非核苷逆转录酶抑制剂,以及 V82、L76 和 M46(2% vs. 2%)的蛋白酶抑制剂。共有 35%(27/78)的青少年在 RNA 和 DNA 中具有一致的 DRM 特征,而 27%(21/78)的青少年仅在前病毒 DNA 中具有 DRMs。存档 DRMs 的存在与晚期临床分期 3/4(OR=0.14,p=0.0003)和 PVL<5Log(Copies/mL)(OR:4.88,p=0.006)相关。
尽管血浆 RNA 仍然更敏感地检测到 HIV-1 DRMs,但在非洲环境中接受 ART 治疗失败的大约四分之一的 ALPHI 可能在前病毒储库中具有存档的 DRMs,表明存在临床隐匿性耐药。因此,为确保有效的 ART 成功,除了 RNA 基因分型外,还应在前病毒 DNA 分析(同时进行 RNA 基因分型)中为处于晚期临床阶段和/或中度 PVL 的青少年提供额外的 DRMs。