ADIR Association, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France; Normandie University, UNIROUEN, UPRES EA 3830, Haute Normandie Research and Biomedical Innovation, Rouen, France.
ADIR Association, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France.
J Physiother. 2022 Jan;68(1):43-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jphys.2021.12.010. Epub 2021 Dec 21.
In people with non-small cell lung cancer, what is the effect of condensing 15 prehabilitation sessions into a 3-week regimen compared with a 5-week regimen?
Randomised controlled trial with concealed allocation, intention-to-treat analysis and blinded assessment of the primary outcome.
People with diagnosed or suspected non-small cell lung cancer and moderate-to-high risk of postoperative complications.
Fifteen supervised prehabilitation sessions delivered with either a dense regimen of five sessions/week for 3 weeks (experimental group) or a non-dense regimen of three sessions/week for 5 weeks (control group).
The primary outcome was the change in cardiorespiratory fitness measured by the V̇O in ml/kg/min. The secondary outcomes were the change in other variables of interest measured during cardiopulmonary exercise testing, non-invasive nutritional markers, quadriceps maximal voluntary isometric contractions, maximal inspiratory pressure, quality of life, adherence and postoperative complications.
Changes with the experimental regimen were similar to or better than changes with the control regimen for: V̇O (MD 1.2 ml/kg/min, 95% CI -0.1 to 2.6); V̇E/V̇CO slope (MD -3.6 points, 95% CI -8.7 to 1.5); and work rate at ventilatory threshold (MD 3.7 W, 95% CI -5.6 to 13.0). The two regimens had similar effects on: peak work rate (MD 1.3 W, 95% CI -6.4 to 9.0), V̇O at ventilatory threshold (MD 0.0 ml/kg/min, 95% CI -1.4 to 1.4); body mass index (MD -0.2 kg/m, 95% CI -0.5 to 0.1); and maximal inspiratory pressure (MD -0.7 cmHO, 95% CI -9.8 to 8.4). The relative effect was uncertain for quadriceps maximal voluntary isometric contractions, quality of life and complications.
Condensing prehabilitation sessions led to similar or better improvement in cardiorespiratory fitness and did not decrease adherence or increase adverse events. This could increase the number of patients who can be referred for prehabilitation, despite short presurgical periods.
NCT03936764.
在非小细胞肺癌患者中,将 15 次预康复疗程浓缩为 3 周疗程与 5 周疗程相比,有何效果?
随机对照试验,设隐匿分组,意向治疗分析,主要结局评估设盲。
患有确诊或疑似非小细胞肺癌且术后并发症风险中高的患者。
15 次监督预康复疗程,采用每周 5 次/疗程 3 周的密集方案(实验组)或每周 3 次/疗程 5 周的非密集方案(对照组)。
主要结局是通过 V̇O in ml/kg/min 测量的心肺适能变化。次要结局是心肺运动测试期间其他感兴趣变量的变化、无创营养标志物、股四头肌最大自主等长收缩、最大吸气压力、生活质量、依从性和术后并发症。
实验组的变化与对照组的变化相似或优于:V̇O(MD 1.2 ml/kg/min,95%CI -0.1 至 2.6);V̇E/V̇CO 斜率(MD -3.6 点,95%CI -8.7 至 1.5);以及通气阈时的工作率(MD 3.7 W,95%CI -5.6 至 13.0)。两种方案对以下方面的影响相似:峰值工作率(MD 1.3 W,95%CI -6.4 至 9.0);通气阈时的 V̇O(MD 0.0 ml/kg/min,95%CI -1.4 至 1.4);体重指数(MD -0.2 kg/m,95%CI -0.5 至 0.1);以及最大吸气压力(MD -0.7 cmHO,95%CI -9.8 至 8.4)。股四头肌最大自主等长收缩、生活质量和并发症的相对效果不确定。
将预康复疗程浓缩可使心肺适能得到相似或更好的改善,且不会降低依从性或增加不良事件。这可以增加可转诊接受预康复的患者数量,尽管术前时间较短。
NCT03936764。