Suppr超能文献

大麻非刑罪化与大麻持有逮捕中的种族差异。

Cannabis decriminalization and racial disparity in arrests for cannabis possession.

机构信息

Herbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Human Longevity Science, University of California San Diego, CA, USA.

Herbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Human Longevity Science, University of California San Diego, CA, USA.

出版信息

Soc Sci Med. 2022 Jan;293:114672. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114672. Epub 2021 Dec 22.

Abstract

RATIONALE

Minorities often bear the brunt of unequal enforcement of drug laws. In the U.S., Blacks have been disproportionately more likely to be arrested for cannabis possession than Whites despite a similar rate of cannabis use. Decriminalizing cannabis has been argued as a way to reduce racial disparity in cannabis possession arrests. To date, however, the empirical evidence to support this argument is almost non-existent.

OBJECTIVES

To examine whether cannabis decriminalization was associated with reduced racial disparity in arrests for cannabis possession between Blacks and Whites in the U.S.

METHODS

Using FBI Uniform Crime Report data from 37 U.S. states, cannabis possession arrest rates were calculated separately for Blacks and Whites from 2000 to 2019. A difference-in-differences framework was used to estimate the association between cannabis decriminalization and racial disparity in cannabis possession arrest rates (Blacks/Whites ratio) among adults and youths.

RESULTS

Cannabis possession arrest rates declined over 70% among adults and over 40% among youths after the implementation of cannabis decriminalization in 11 states. Among adults, decriminalization was associated with a roughly 17% decrease in racial disparity in arrest rates between Blacks and Whites. Among youths, arrest rates declined among both Blacks and Whites but there was no evidence for a change in racial disparity between Blacks and Whites following decriminalization.

CONCLUSIONS

Cannabis decriminalization was associated with substantially lower cannabis possession arrest rates among both adults and youths and among both Blacks and Whites. It reduced racial disparity between Blacks and Whites among adults but not youths. These findings suggested that cannabis decriminalization had its intended consequence of reducing arrests and may have potential to reduce racial disparity in arrests at least among adults.

摘要

背景

少数民族往往首当其冲地受到不平等执法毒品法的影响。在美国,尽管大麻使用率相似,但黑人因持有大麻被捕的可能性却远远超过白人。大麻合法化被认为是减少大麻持有逮捕中种族差异的一种方法。然而,迄今为止,支持这一论点的经验证据几乎不存在。

目的

研究大麻合法化是否与美国黑人因持有大麻被捕的种族差异减少有关。

方法

利用 FBI 统一犯罪报告数据,从 2000 年到 2019 年,我们分别计算了美国 37 个州的黑人(Blacks)和白人(Whites)的大麻持有逮捕率。采用双重差分框架,估计大麻合法化与大麻持有逮捕率(黑人/白人比率)种族差异之间的关联,包括成年人和青少年。

结果

在 11 个州实施大麻合法化后,成年人的大麻持有逮捕率下降了 70%以上,青少年的逮捕率下降了 40%以上。在成年人中,大麻合法化与黑人(Blacks)和白人(Whites)之间的逮捕率种族差异减少了约 17%有关。在青少年中,黑人(Blacks)和白人(Whites)的逮捕率都有所下降,但在大麻合法化后,黑人(Blacks)和白人(Whites)之间的种族差异没有证据表明发生了变化。

结论

大麻合法化与成年人和青少年以及黑人和白人的大麻持有逮捕率大幅下降有关。它减少了成年人中黑人(Blacks)和白人(Whites)之间的种族差异,但在青少年中没有。这些发现表明,大麻合法化达到了减少逮捕的预期效果,至少在成年人中,它可能具有减少逮捕种族差异的潜力。

相似文献

1
Cannabis decriminalization and racial disparity in arrests for cannabis possession.
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Jan;293:114672. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114672. Epub 2021 Dec 22.
2
Association of Racial Disparity of Cannabis Possession Arrests Among Adults and Youths With Statewide Cannabis Decriminalization and Legalization.
JAMA Health Forum. 2021 Oct 29;2(10):e213435. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.3435. eCollection 2021 Oct.
3
Youth and Adult Arrests for Cannabis Possession After Decriminalization and Legalization of Cannabis.
JAMA Pediatr. 2019 Aug 1;173(8):763-769. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.1539.
4
Association of Recreational Cannabis Legalization With Cannabis Possession Arrest Rates in the US.
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Dec 1;5(12):e2244922. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.44922.
5
A tale of two cities: Racialized arrests following decriminalization and recreational legalization of cannabis.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2023 Aug 1;249:109911. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2023.109911. Epub 2023 May 6.
6
The heterogeneous effect of marijuana decriminalization policy on arrest rates in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 2009-2018.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020 Jul 1;212:108058. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108058. Epub 2020 May 15.
7
Cannabis decriminalization: A study of recent policy change in five U.S. states.
Int J Drug Policy. 2018 Sep;59:67-75. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2018.06.016. Epub 2018 Jul 17.
8
Changes in arrests following decriminalization of low-level drug possession in Oregon and Washington.
Int J Drug Policy. 2023 Sep;119:104155. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2023.104155. Epub 2023 Aug 9.
9
Racial Disparities in Drug Arrest Before and After De Facto Decriminalization in Baltimore.
Am J Prev Med. 2023 Oct;65(4):560-567. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2023.04.004. Epub 2023 Apr 15.
10
Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Arrests for Drug Possession After California Proposition 47, 2011-2016.
Am J Public Health. 2018 Aug;108(8):987-993. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304445. Epub 2018 Jun 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Drug Decriminalization and Fatal Traffic Crashes: Evidence From BM110 in Oregon.
Health Econ. 2025 May;34(5):815-820. doi: 10.1002/hec.4944. Epub 2025 Jan 31.
2
Germany's cannabis act: a catalyst for European drug policy reform?
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2024 May 14;42:100929. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.100929. eCollection 2024 Jul.
4
Potential role of cannabis in ameliorating observed racialized disparities in cancer pain management.
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2024 Jul 1;116(7):1019-1025. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djae058.
5
Associations between cannabis policies and state-level specialty cannabis use disorder treatment in the United States, 2004-2019.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2024 Apr 1;257:111113. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2024.111113. Epub 2024 Feb 2.
6
Public Education Can Be Used to Increase Support for Equity in Cannabis Policy.
Cannabis. 2023 Jul 5;6(2):76-88. doi: 10.26828/cannabis/2023/000146. eCollection 2023.
7
Policing Pot: State-Level Cannabis Arrests Increase Perceived Risks and Costs but Not Use.
Cannabis. 2022 Jul 11;5(2):40-49. doi: 10.26828/cannabis/2022.02.004. eCollection 2022.
8
Association of Recreational Cannabis Legalization With Cannabis Possession Arrest Rates in the US.
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Dec 1;5(12):e2244922. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.44922.

本文引用的文献

1
The heterogeneous effect of marijuana decriminalization policy on arrest rates in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 2009-2018.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020 Jul 1;212:108058. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108058. Epub 2020 May 15.
3
Youth and Adult Arrests for Cannabis Possession After Decriminalization and Legalization of Cannabis.
JAMA Pediatr. 2019 Aug 1;173(8):763-769. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.1539.
4
Cannabis decriminalization: A study of recent policy change in five U.S. states.
Int J Drug Policy. 2018 Sep;59:67-75. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2018.06.016. Epub 2018 Jul 17.
5
Cannabis decriminalization and the age of onset of cannabis use.
Int J Drug Policy. 2017 May;43:122-129. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2017.02.014. Epub 2017 Apr 7.
6
Black and Hispanic Men Perceived to Be Large Are at Increased Risk for Police Frisk, Search, and Force.
PLoS One. 2016 Jan 19;11(1):e0147158. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147158. eCollection 2016.
7
The impact of marijuana policies on youth: clinical, research, and legal update.
Pediatrics. 2015 Mar;135(3):584-7. doi: 10.1542/peds.2014-4146. Epub 2015 Jan 26.
8
What can we learn from the Dutch cannabis coffeeshop system?
Addiction. 2011 Nov;106(11):1899-910. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03572.x. Epub 2011 Sep 11.
9
Workers' Compensation reform policy.
New Solut. 2010;20(3):397-404. doi: 10.2190/NS.20.3.l.
10
Cross-national comparison of adolescent drinking and cannabis use in the United States, Canada, and the Netherlands.
Int J Drug Policy. 2010 Jan;21(1):64-9. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2009.02.003. Epub 2009 Mar 20.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验