Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Schleswig Holstein, Campus Luebeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, Haus A, 23538, Luebeck, Germany.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Schleswig Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2022 Jun;305(6):1481-1490. doi: 10.1007/s00404-021-06360-9. Epub 2021 Dec 26.
Da-Vinci-Xi is the most recent device used in gynecologic robotic surgery. The aim of the present study was to compare the long-term satisfaction of patients who had undergone conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy or robotic assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy using the Da-Vinci-Xi surgical system.
All hysterectomies performed at the University Hospital of Luebeck from 2018 to 2019 were reviewed. Postoperative outcomes were compared between women who had undergone total hysterectomy with da Vinci Xi (n = 42) or conventional laparoscopy (n = 97). Postoperative outcomes included pain, elimination of complaints after surgery, bladder function, sexual function, satisfaction with the cosmetic outcome, positive experiences after robotic surgery, and satisfaction with the surgeon's preoperative explanation. Obese patients were evaluated separately in a subgroup analysis.
Both groups had similar baseline characteristics and complication rates. Preoperative complaints subsided after surgery in a little more than 90% of patients. No significant differences were noted between groups in this regard (p = 0.262), or with reference to postoperative pain after one week (p = 0.866) and one month (p = 0.580), stress incontinence (p = 0.343), sexual function (p = 0.766) and the cosmetic outcome of the abdominal incisions (p = 0.273). The majority of patients who had undergone robotic surgery (96.8%) would be willing to undergo the procedure again if necessary. The subgroup analysis of obese patients revealed no significant differences.
The Da-Vinci-Xi device did not improve the long-term surgical satisfaction of normal-weight or obese patients who underwent hysterectomy compared with patients who underwent conventional laparoscopy performed by experienced laparoscopic surgeons.
达芬奇 Xi 是用于妇科机器人手术的最新设备。本研究旨在比较在吕贝克大学医院 2018 年至 2019 年期间进行的传统腹腔镜子宫切除术与使用达芬奇 Xi 机器人辅助腹腔镜子宫切除术的患者的长期满意度。
回顾了所有在吕贝克大学医院进行的子宫切除术。比较了接受达芬奇 Xi 全子宫切除术的女性(n=42)和接受传统腹腔镜的女性(n=97)之间的术后结果。术后结果包括疼痛、术后症状消除、膀胱功能、性功能、对美容效果的满意度、机器人手术后的积极体验以及对外科医生术前解释的满意度。在亚组分析中,单独评估肥胖患者。
两组患者的基线特征和并发症发生率相似。超过 90%的患者术前症状在手术后得到缓解。两组之间在这方面没有显著差异(p=0.262),或在术后一周(p=0.866)和一个月(p=0.580)的术后疼痛、压力性尿失禁(p=0.343)、性功能(p=0.766)和腹部切口美容效果(p=0.273)方面无显著差异。大多数接受机器人手术的患者(96.8%)如果需要,愿意再次接受该手术。肥胖患者的亚组分析没有发现显著差异。
与接受经验丰富的腹腔镜外科医生进行的传统腹腔镜手术的患者相比,达芬奇 Xi 设备并未提高接受子宫切除术的正常体重或肥胖患者的长期手术满意度。