• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

载脂蛋白 B 浓度与 Friedewald、Martin-Hopkins 和 Sampson 公式计算 LDL 胆固醇的一致性。

Concordance of apolipoprotein B concentration with the Friedewald, Martin-Hopkins, and Sampson formulas for calculating LDL cholesterol.

机构信息

Department of Laboratory Medicine, AZ St-Jan Hospital, Brugge, Belgium.

Department of Diagnostic Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

出版信息

Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2022 Feb 15;32(1):010704. doi: 10.11613/BM.2022.010704. Epub 2021 Dec 15.

DOI:10.11613/BM.2022.010704
PMID:34955672
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8672388/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Two new formulas, the Martin-Hopkins and the Sampson formula, were recently developed to overcome shortcomings of the Friedewald formula for calculating LDL-cholesterol. We aimed to compare the concordance of the two formulas with apolipoprotein B (apoB), a surrogate marker of the number of LDL particles.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In a study of serum lipid data of 1179 patients who consulted the AZ St-Jan Hospital Bruges for cardiovascular risk assessment, the correlation and concordance of the Friedewald, Martin-Hopkins and Sampson formulas with apoB concentration, measured by immunonephelometry, were determined and compared.

RESULTS

The Martin-Hopkins formula showed significantly higher correlation coefficient than the Friedewald formula with apoB in the entire dataset and in patients with low LDL-cholesterol < 1.8 mmol/L. Both Martin-Hopkins and Sampson formulas yielded > 70% concordance of LDL-cholesterol with regard to treatment group classification based on population-equivalent thresholds of apoB in hypertriglyceridemic patients (2-4.5 mmol/L), with the highest concordance (75.6%) obtained using Martin-Hopkins formula . 60.5% with Friedewald formula.

CONCLUSION

The Martin-Hopkins (and, to a lesser extent, Sampson) formula is more closely associated with the number of LDL particles than Friedewald formula. This, in combination with literature evidence of lesser accuracy of the Friedewald formula, is an argument to switch from Friedewald to a modified, improved formula.

摘要

简介

为了克服 Friedewald 公式在计算 LDL 胆固醇方面的缺陷,最近开发了两种新的公式,即 Martin-Hopkins 公式和 Sampson 公式。我们旨在比较这两种公式与载脂蛋白 B(apoB)的一致性,apoB 是 LDL 颗粒数的替代标志物。

材料和方法

在对 1179 名因心血管风险评估而到布鲁日 AZ St-Jan 医院就诊的患者的血清脂质数据进行的一项研究中,通过免疫比浊法测定 apoB 浓度,确定并比较了 Friedewald、Martin-Hopkins 和 Sampson 公式与 apoB 浓度的相关性和一致性。

结果

Martin-Hopkins 公式与整个数据集和 LDL 胆固醇 < 1.8 mmol/L 的低 LDL 胆固醇患者的 apoB 相关性显著高于 Friedewald 公式。在患有高甘油三酯血症(2-4.5 mmol/L)的患者中,基于 apoB 的人群等效阈值将 LDL 胆固醇治疗组分类,Martin-Hopkins 和 Sampson 公式均产生 > 70%的 LDL 胆固醇一致性,Martin-Hopkins 公式的一致性最高(75.6%),Friedewald 公式为 60.5%。

结论

与 Friedewald 公式相比,Martin-Hopkins(以及在较小程度上,Sampson)公式与 LDL 颗粒数的相关性更强。这与 Friedewald 公式准确性较差的文献证据相结合,是从 Friedewald 公式切换到改进的改良公式的一个论据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a00/8672388/c93dae0c62e0/bm-32-1-010704-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a00/8672388/bc74369d1536/bm-32-1-010704-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a00/8672388/bfa9a38c91c4/bm-32-1-010704-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a00/8672388/c93dae0c62e0/bm-32-1-010704-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a00/8672388/bc74369d1536/bm-32-1-010704-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a00/8672388/bfa9a38c91c4/bm-32-1-010704-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a00/8672388/c93dae0c62e0/bm-32-1-010704-f3.jpg

相似文献

1
Concordance of apolipoprotein B concentration with the Friedewald, Martin-Hopkins, and Sampson formulas for calculating LDL cholesterol.载脂蛋白 B 浓度与 Friedewald、Martin-Hopkins 和 Sampson 公式计算 LDL 胆固醇的一致性。
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2022 Feb 15;32(1):010704. doi: 10.11613/BM.2022.010704. Epub 2021 Dec 15.
2
Comparability of 11 different equations for estimating LDL cholesterol on different analysers.比较不同分析仪上 11 种不同 LDL 胆固醇估算方程的可比性。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2021 Aug 12;59(12):1930-1943. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2021-0747. Print 2021 Nov 25.
3
Comparison of the accuracy of the Friedewald, Martin, and Sampson formulas to estimate very low levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol.比较 Friedewald、Martin 和 Sampson 公式估算极低水平低密度脂蛋白胆固醇的准确性。
Endokrynol Pol. 2023;74(2):203-210. doi: 10.5603/EP.a2023.0025.
4
Discordance Between Standard Equations for Determination of LDL Cholesterol in Patients With Atherosclerosis.动脉粥样硬化患者 LDL 胆固醇测定的标准方程之间的差异。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 Feb 15;79(6):530-541. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.11.042.
5
Comparison of Methods to Estimate Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol in Patients With High Triglyceride Levels.比较高甘油三酯血症患者估算低密度脂蛋白胆固醇的方法。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Oct 1;4(10):e2128817. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.28817.
6
Comparative performance of equations to estimate low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and cardiovascular disease incidence: The ATTICA study (2002-2022).估算低密度脂蛋白胆固醇水平及心血管疾病发病率的方程的比较性能:阿提卡研究(2002年 - 2022年)
Lipids. 2023 Jul;58(4):159-170. doi: 10.1002/lipd.12371. Epub 2023 May 8.
7
Applicability of Martin-Hopkins formula and comparison with Friedewald formula for estimated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in e_COR study population.马丁-霍普金斯公式在 e_COR 研究人群中的适用性及其与弗里德瓦尔德公式估算低密度脂蛋白胆固醇的比较。
Rev Port Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2021 Oct;40(10):715-724. doi: 10.1016/j.repce.2021.07.001. Epub 2021 Aug 11.
8
Non-HDL-C/TG ratio indicates significant underestimation of calculated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) better than TG level: a study on the reliability of mathematical formulas used for LDL-C estimation.非高密度脂蛋白胆固醇/甘油三酯比值比甘油三酯水平更能显著低估计算得出的低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C):用于 LDL-C 估算的数学公式可靠性研究。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2020 Dec 24;59(5):857-867. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2020-1366. Print 2021 Apr 27.
9
Evaluation of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol equations by cross-platform assessment of accuracy-based EQA data against SI-traceable reference value.基于与 SI 可溯源参考值的准确性的 EQA 数据的跨平台评估来评价 LDL-C 方程。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2023 Apr 4;61(10):1808-1819. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2022-1301. Print 2023 Sep 26.
10
Comparison of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol equations in patients with dyslipidaemia receiving cholesterol ester transfer protein inhibition.在接受胆固醇酯转移蛋白抑制治疗的血脂异常患者中比较低密度脂蛋白胆固醇方程。
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2023 Feb 2;9(2):148-155. doi: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvac056.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing Performance of Martins's and Sampson's Formulae for Calculation of LDL-C in Indian Population: A Single Center Retrospective Study.评估马丁斯公式和桑普森公式在印度人群中计算低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)的性能:一项单中心回顾性研究。
Indian J Clin Biochem. 2024 Oct;39(4):579-585. doi: 10.1007/s12291-023-01142-3. Epub 2023 Jul 7.
2
Comparison of Performance of Various Calculated Low-Density Lipoprotein (LDL) Methods in the Indian Population: A Hospital-Based Study.印度人群中各种计算低密度脂蛋白(LDL)方法的性能比较:一项基于医院的研究。
Cureus. 2024 Jun 17;16(6):e62517. doi: 10.7759/cureus.62517. eCollection 2024 Jun.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Utility of non-HDL-C and apoB targets in the context of new more aggressive lipid guidelines.在新的更积极的血脂指南背景下,非高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(non-HDL-C)和载脂蛋白B(apoB)目标值的效用
Am J Prev Cardiol. 2021 May 29;7:100203. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpc.2021.100203. eCollection 2021 Sep.
2
Comparability of 11 different equations for estimating LDL cholesterol on different analysers.比较不同分析仪上 11 种不同 LDL 胆固醇估算方程的可比性。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2021 Aug 12;59(12):1930-1943. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2021-0747. Print 2021 Nov 25.
3
LDL Cholesterol: 'The Times They Are A-Changin'.
Cardiovascular Risk Assessment and Control in Outpatients Evaluated by 24-hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure and Different LDL-C Equations.
门诊患者 24 小时动态血压和不同 LDL-C 方程评估的心血管风险评估和控制。
High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev. 2023 Nov;30(6):551-560. doi: 10.1007/s40292-023-00605-1. Epub 2023 Oct 30.
4
Assessing the Practical Differences in LDL-C Estimates Calculated by Friedewald, Martin/Hopkins, or NIH Equation 2: An Observation Cross-Sectional Study.评估通过弗里德瓦尔德、马丁/霍普金斯或美国国立卫生研究院方程2计算的低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)估计值的实际差异:一项横断面观察研究。
J Lipid Atheroscler. 2023 Sep;12(3):252-266. doi: 10.12997/jla.2023.12.3.252. Epub 2023 Jun 20.
低密度脂蛋白胆固醇:时代在变。
Clin Chem. 2020 Sep 1;66(9):1136-1139. doi: 10.1093/clinchem/hvaa110.
4
New Sampson Low-Density Lipoprotein Equation: Better Than Friedewald and Martin-Hopkins.新的桑普森低密度脂蛋白方程:优于弗里德瓦尔德方程和马丁 - 霍普金斯方程。
Clin Chem. 2020 Aug 1;66(8):1120-1121. doi: 10.1093/clinchem/hvaa126.
5
Non-HDL Cholesterol or apoB: Which to Prefer as a Target for the Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease?非高密度脂蛋白胆固醇还是载脂蛋白 B:预防动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病,哪个指标更适合作为靶点?
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2020 Jun 19;22(8):67. doi: 10.1007/s11886-020-01323-z.
6
A New Equation for Calculation of Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol in Patients With Normolipidemia and/or Hypertriglyceridemia.载脂蛋白 B 正常或高甘油三酯血症患者计算低密度脂蛋白胆固醇的新方程。
JAMA Cardiol. 2020 May 1;5(5):540-548. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.0013.
7
Quantifying atherogenic lipoproteins for lipid-lowering strategies: consensus-based recommendations from EAS and EFLM.定量动脉粥样硬化脂蛋白用于降脂策略:EAS 和 EFLM 的基于共识的建议。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2020 Mar 26;58(4):496-517. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2019-1253.
8
2019 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias: lipid modification to reduce cardiovascular risk.2019年欧洲心脏病学会/欧洲动脉粥样硬化学会血脂异常管理指南:通过血脂修饰降低心血管风险
Eur Heart J. 2020 Jan 1;41(1):111-188. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz455.
9
2018 AHA/ACC/AACVPR/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/ADA/AGS/APhA/ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guideline on the Management of Blood Cholesterol: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines.2018 年美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会/美国心血管血管造影和介入学会/美国预防、物理治疗和康复医师学会/美国糖尿病协会/美国老年学会/美国药学会/美国医师协会/美国生理学会/北美介入放射学会/美国国家脂质协会/美国临床内分泌医师协会胆固醇管理指南:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会临床实践指南工作组的报告。
Circulation. 2019 Jun 18;139(25):e1082-e1143. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000625. Epub 2018 Nov 10.
10
Comparison of Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Assessment by Martin/Hopkins Estimation, Friedewald Estimation, and Preparative Ultracentrifugation: Insights From the FOURIER Trial.马丁/霍普金斯估计、弗里德瓦尔德估计和制备超速离心法评估低密度脂蛋白胆固醇的比较: FOURIER 试验的见解。
JAMA Cardiol. 2018 Aug 1;3(8):749-753. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2018.1533.