Kelly Dervla, O'Doherty Diane, Harney Sarah, Slattery Natasha, Crowley Louise, McKeague Helena
School of Medicine, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
ULCaN, Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
Med Sci Educ. 2021 Nov 2;31(6):1931-1940. doi: 10.1007/s40670-021-01429-1. eCollection 2021 Dec.
Despite acknowledgement of medical students' expected professional behaviours and attitudes, there remains widespread reluctance to report students that behave inappropriately. Existing literature focuses on why faculty fail to fail, overlooking the tutors who deal with students day to day. We investigated how tutors address inappropriate behaviours and attitudes in students and residents.
A mixed methods study was carried out consisting of a survey and two focus groups with tutors. Seventeen tutors from the University of Limerick School of Medicine, Ireland, took part in the survey ( = 22%) and eight tutors participated in two focus groups during the 2018-2019 academic year.
Findings suggested that 59% of tutors would take a different approach to addressing unprofessional behaviours witnessed in medical students and residents. A total of 88% of tutors said they intervened on a professionalism issue with 52% saying 'once in a while'. In contrast to the survey, tutors in the focus groups expressed a lack of confidence in addressing some behaviours due to a lack of time, not seeing the outcome of process/remediation etc. Tutors indicated a strong preference for case-based training on assessing professional identity formation (PIF).
We found tutors typically work closely with students on a day-to-day basis managing unprofessionalism issues. Tutors valued regular communication about policies and procedures about appropriate conduct as well as support, advice, and/or oversight from independent members of university staff. This research highlights the need for training designed for busy tutors as a distinct type of medical teacher.
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40670-021-01429-1.
尽管人们认可医学生应具备的职业行为和态度,但对于举报行为不当的学生,仍然普遍存在抵触情绪。现有文献关注的是教师为何未能让学生不及格,却忽略了与学生日常打交道的导师。我们调查了导师如何处理学生和住院医师的不当行为及态度。
开展了一项混合方法研究,包括一项调查以及与导师进行的两个焦点小组讨论。2018 - 2019学年,爱尔兰利默里克大学医学院的17名导师参与了调查(占比22%),8名导师参与了两个焦点小组讨论。
研究结果表明,59%的导师会采取不同方法来处理在医学生和住院医师身上目睹的不专业行为。共有88%的导师表示他们曾就职业素养问题进行干预,其中52%的人表示“偶尔”干预。与调查结果形成对比的是,焦点小组中的导师表示,由于时间不足、看不到处理过程/补救措施的结果等原因,他们在处理某些行为时缺乏信心。导师们表示强烈倾向于开展基于案例的评估职业身份形成(PIF)的培训。
我们发现导师通常在日常工作中与学生密切合作,处理不专业行为问题。导师重视关于适当行为的政策和程序的定期沟通,以及来自大学工作人员独立成员的支持、建议和/或监督。这项研究凸显了为忙碌的导师设计专门培训的必要性,因为他们是一种独特类型的医学教师。
在线版本包含可在10.1007/s40670 - 021 - 01429 - 1获取的补充材料。