• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

定义初次全膝关节置换术后 HOOS JR 和 KOOS JR 的患者可接受症状状态。

Defining the Patient Acceptable Symptom State for the HOOS JR and KOOS JR After Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY.

Center for the Advancement of Value in Musculoskeletal Care, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY.

出版信息

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2022 Feb 16;104(4):345-352. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.21.00550.

DOI:10.2106/JBJS.21.00550
PMID:34958538
Abstract

BACKGROUND

It is essential to quantify an acceptable outcome after total joint arthroplasty (TJA) in order to understand quality of care. The purpose of this study was to define patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) thresholds for the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Joint Replacement (KOOS JR) and the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Joint Replacement (HOOS JR) after TJA.

METHODS

A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, leveraging 2-year satisfaction of "moderate improvement" or better as the anchor, was used to establish PASS thresholds among 5,216 patients who underwent primary total hip arthroplasty and 4,036 who underwent primary total knee arthroplasty from 2007 to 2012 with use of an institutional registry. Changes in PASS thresholds were explored by stratifying and recalculating these thresholds by age at the time of surgery (<70 or ≥70 years of age), sex (men or women), body mass index (BMI; <30 or ≥30 kg/m2), and baseline Short Form-36 (SF-36) physical and mental component scores (<50 or ≥50).

RESULTS

The HOOS JR PASS threshold was 76.7 (area under the ROC curve [AUC] = 0.91), which was achieved by 4,334 patients (83.1%). The KOOS JR PASS threshold was 63.7 (AUC = 0.89), which was achieved by 3,461 patients (85.8%). Covariate stratification demonstrated that PASS thresholds were higher in men compared with women, and in those with higher preoperative SF-36 physical and mental scores (≥50) compared with lower SF-36 scores (<50). Results differed between instruments for BMI and age: higher BMI was associated with a lower PASS threshold for the HOOS JR but a higher PASS threshold for the KOOS JR. The HOOS JR PASS threshold was higher in patients who were <70 years of age compared with those who were ≥70 years of age, but was equivalent for the KOOS JR.

CONCLUSIONS

The PASS thresholds for the HOOS JR and KOOS JR at 2 years after TJA were 76.7 and 63.7, respectively. The PASS thresholds were associated with certain preoperative covariates, suggesting that an acceptable symptom state after TJA is influenced by patient-specific factors.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

摘要

背景

为了了解医疗质量,对全关节置换术后(TJA)可接受的结果进行量化是至关重要的。本研究的目的是为膝关节损伤和骨关节炎评分(KOOS JR)和髋关节残疾和骨关节炎评分(HOOS JR)定义 TJA 后患者可接受的症状状态(PASS)阈值。

方法

使用接受者操作特征(ROC)曲线分析,以 2 年的“中度改善”或更好的满意度作为锚点,对 2007 年至 2012 年期间使用机构登记处接受初次全髋关节置换术的 5216 例患者和初次全膝关节置换术的 4036 例患者进行分析,以确定 PASS 阈值。通过分层和重新计算手术时年龄(<70 岁或≥70 岁)、性别(男性或女性)、体重指数(BMI;<30 或≥30kg/m2)和基线简短表格-36(SF-36)身体和心理成分评分(<50 或≥50)的这些阈值,探讨了 PASS 阈值的变化。

结果

HOOS JR 的 PASS 阈值为 76.7(ROC 曲线下面积[AUC]为 0.91),有 4334 例患者(83.1%)达到了这一阈值。KOOS JR 的 PASS 阈值为 63.7(AUC = 0.89),有 3461 例患者(85.8%)达到了这一阈值。协变量分层表明,与女性相比,男性的 PASS 阈值更高,与较低的 SF-36 身体和心理评分(<50)相比,较高的 SF-36 身体和心理评分(≥50)的 PASS 阈值更高。在 BMI 和年龄方面,仪器之间的结果有所不同:较高的 BMI 与 HOOS JR 的 PASS 阈值较低有关,但与 KOOS JR 的 PASS 阈值较高有关。与≥70 岁的患者相比,<70 岁的患者的 HOOS JR PASS 阈值更高,但 KOOS JR 的 PASS 阈值则相当。

结论

TJA 后 2 年 HOOS JR 和 KOOS JR 的 PASS 阈值分别为 76.7 和 63.7。PASS 阈值与某些术前因素有关,这表明 TJA 后可接受的症状状态受患者特定因素的影响。

证据水平

预后 IV 级。有关证据水平的完整描述,请参见作者说明。

相似文献

1
Defining the Patient Acceptable Symptom State for the HOOS JR and KOOS JR After Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty.定义初次全膝关节置换术后 HOOS JR 和 KOOS JR 的患者可接受症状状态。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2022 Feb 16;104(4):345-352. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.21.00550.
2
Defining Patient-relevant Thresholds and Change Scores for the HOOS JR and KOOS JR Anchored on the Patient-acceptable Symptom State Question.定义与患者相关的 HOOS JR 和 KOOS JR 阈值和变化分数,以患者可接受的症状状态问题为基础。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Apr 1;482(4):688-698. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002857. Epub 2023 Sep 29.
3
Comparing Methods to Determine the Minimal Clinically Important Differences in Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Veterans Undergoing Elective Total Hip or Knee Arthroplasty in Veterans Health Administration Hospitals.比较在退伍军人事务部医院接受择期全髋关节或全膝关节置换术的退伍军人患者报告的结局测量中确定最小临床重要差异的方法。
JAMA Surg. 2020 May 1;155(5):404-411. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.0024.
4
Development and Validation of Crosswalks Between the Western Ontario & McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index and Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Joint Replacement/Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Joint Replacement.西安大略大学和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数与髋关节残疾及骨关节炎疗效评分关节置换/膝关节损伤及骨关节炎疗效评分关节置换之间的转换关系的建立与验证。
J Arthroplasty. 2022 Jun;37(6):1034-1039.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2021.11.009. Epub 2021 Nov 11.
5
What Are the Minimal and Substantial Improvements in the HOOS and KOOS and JR Versions After Total Joint Replacement?全膝关节置换术后 HOOS 和 KOOS 及 JR 版本的最小和实质性改善是什么?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 Dec;476(12):2432-2441. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000456.
6
What Are the Diagnosis-Specific Thresholds of Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Patient Acceptable Symptom State in Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score After Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty?初次全髋关节置换术后髋关节障碍和骨关节炎结果评分中最小临床重要差异和患者可接受症状状态的诊断特异性阈值是什么?
J Arthroplasty. 2024 Jul;39(7):1783-1788.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.01.051. Epub 2024 Feb 7.
7
Diagnosis-Specific Thresholds of the Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Patient Acceptable Symptom State for KOOS After Total Knee Arthroplasty.全膝关节置换术后 KOOS 最小临床重要差异和患者可接受症状状态的诊断特异性阈值。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2024 May 1;106(9):793-800. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.23.00027. Epub 2024 Feb 21.
8
How Much Perioperative Pain and Dysfunction Underlie the HOOS JR and KOOS JR?HOOS JR 和 KOOS JR 背后有多少围手术期疼痛和功能障碍?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2023 Sep 1;481(9):1800-1810. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002606. Epub 2023 Mar 14.
9
Crosswalks Between Knee and Hip Arthroplasty Short Forms: HOOS/KOOS JR and Oxford.膝关节和髋关节置换术短表的交叉:HOOS/KOOS JR 和牛津。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2020 Jun 3;102(11):983-990. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.19.00916.
10
Patient Acceptable Symptom State at 1 and 3 Years After Total Knee Arthroplasty: Thresholds for the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS).患者在全膝关节置换术后 1 年和 3 年的可接受症状状态:膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结果评分(KOOS)的阈值。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019 Jun 5;101(11):995-1003. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.18.00233.

引用本文的文献

1
Prior hip arthroscopy impacts long-term outcomes of total hip arthroplasty : a propensity-matched study with a minimum ten-year follow-up.既往髋关节镜检查对全髋关节置换术的长期疗效有影响:一项至少十年随访的倾向匹配研究。
Bone Jt Open. 2025 Sep 3;6(9):1022-1030. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.69.BJO-2025-0064.
2
A Comparison of Isolated Tibial Insert Exchanges for Global Instability to Full Revisions for Flexion Instability in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.全膝关节置换翻修术中单纯胫骨假体置换治疗膝关节整体不稳与全翻修治疗屈曲不稳的比较
Arthroplast Today. 2025 Jul 29;34:101782. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2025.101782. eCollection 2025 Aug.
3
Association of spinopelvic mobility and osteosarcopenia with total hip arthroplasty outcomes.
脊柱骨盆活动度及骨质疏松性肌少症与全髋关节置换术预后的相关性
J Exp Orthop. 2025 Aug 5;12(3):e70395. doi: 10.1002/jeo2.70395. eCollection 2025 Jul.
4
Does Achieving the Minimal Clinically Important Difference in the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement at 1 Year Postoperative Predict Satisfaction Following Total Knee Arthroplasty?术后1年膝关节置换的膝关节损伤和骨关节炎疗效评分达到最小临床重要差异是否能预测全膝关节置换术后的满意度?
Arthroplast Today. 2025 Jun 24;34:101751. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2025.101751. eCollection 2025 Aug.
5
Physical activity and the risk of aseptic loosening after total hip arthroplasty: a case-control study from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register.全髋关节置换术后体力活动与无菌性松动风险:一项来自挪威关节置换登记处的病例对照研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025 Jul 4;26(1):639. doi: 10.1186/s12891-025-08865-9.
6
The Anterior-Based Muscle-Sparing Approach for Conversion Total Hip Arthroplasty is Safe and Effective.基于前方的保留肌肉的全髋关节置换翻修术方法安全有效。
Arthroplast Today. 2025 Jun 4;33:101731. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2025.101731. eCollection 2025 Jun.
7
Total Hip Arthroplasty vs Hip Resurfacing in Patients Over 65: A Propensity Score-Matched Comparison of Patient-Reported Outcomes.65岁以上患者的全髋关节置换术与髋关节表面置换术:患者报告结局的倾向评分匹配比较
Arthroplast Today. 2025 May 29;33:101721. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2025.101721. eCollection 2025 Jun.
8
Establishing Threshold Values for the Patient Acceptable Symptom State After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction for the Self Knee Value and the Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Return to Sport after Injury Scale.确定前交叉韧带重建术后患者可接受症状状态的阈值,用于自我膝关节评估值和前交叉韧带损伤后恢复运动量表。
Orthop J Sports Med. 2025 Jun 10;13(6):23259671251343073. doi: 10.1177/23259671251343073. eCollection 2025 Jun.
9
Stratified Comparison of Short-Term Perioperative Outcomes in Direct Anterior Versus Posterolateral Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Review.直接前路与后外侧初次全髋关节置换术围手术期短期结果的分层比较:一项回顾性研究
HSS J. 2025 Mar 14:15563316251323612. doi: 10.1177/15563316251323612.
10
Time-dependent, patient-centered perceptions of quality measures for total joint arthroplasty: a cross-sectional, choice modeling study.全关节置换术质量指标的时间依赖性、以患者为中心的认知:一项横断面选择建模研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025 Jan 13;26(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12891-025-08284-w.