South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD, USA.
Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.
Clin Nurs Res. 2022 Sep;31(7):1250-1262. doi: 10.1177/10547738211067322. Epub 2021 Dec 27.
Guided by the Self and Family-Management framework, relationships between diabetes distress, self-efficacy, resilience and outcomes of A1c, quality of life and health status were explored. A cross-sectional descriptive design was used. Seventy eight individuals were enrolled from US clinics. Data were analyzed to test for associations, main effects and interactions and predictors of self-management. Results indicated low diabetes distress ( = 20.53), high self-efficacy ( = 7.32), moderate resilience ( = 80.27), and mean A1c 7.35%/56.88 mmol/mol. Seventy six percent of participants scored above the mental health norm, and 46% scored above the physical health norm. The average weighted quality of life score was -1.74. Diabetes distress was negatively associated with self-efficacy, resilience, physical health, mental health, and quality of life. Self-efficacy was positively associated with resilience, physical health, and quality of life. Resilience was positively associated with physical health, mental health and quality of life. Positive associations were found between quality of life, and physical and mental health. No associations were found between A1c and variables in the study. Multiple significant interactions were found with A1c, mental health and quality of life outcomes. Terms in the model included treatment regimen, years since diagnosis, provider collaboration, and history of diabetes self-management education. Distress was a significant predictor of health status and quality of life. The results confirm self-management facilitators self-efficacy and resilience and barrier diabetes distress and their relationships with outcomes in the framework. This study contributes to the understanding of the emotional aspect of diabetes. Continuing this work will allow researchers to better understand self-management, support self-management efforts and better outcomes.
本研究以自我与家庭管理框架为指导,探讨了糖尿病困扰、自我效能、韧性与 A1c、生活质量和健康状况结果之间的关系。采用了横断面描述性设计。从美国诊所招募了 78 名参与者。对数据进行分析以检验关联、主效应和交互作用以及自我管理的预测因素。结果表明,糖尿病困扰程度较低( = 20.53),自我效能较高( = 7.32),韧性中等( = 80.27),A1c 平均值为 7.35%/56.88 mmol/mol。76%的参与者心理健康评分高于正常值,46%的人身体健康评分高于正常值。平均加权生活质量评分为-1.74。糖尿病困扰与自我效能、韧性、身体健康、心理健康和生活质量呈负相关。自我效能与韧性、身体健康和生活质量呈正相关。韧性与身体健康、心理健康和生活质量呈正相关。生活质量与身体健康和心理健康呈正相关。A1c 与研究中的变量之间没有关联。与 A1c、心理健康和生活质量结果存在多个显著的交互作用。模型中的术语包括治疗方案、诊断后年限、提供者合作和糖尿病自我管理教育史。困扰是健康状况和生活质量的一个重要预测因素。结果证实了自我管理促进因素自我效能和韧性,以及障碍因素糖尿病困扰及其在该框架中的结果关系。本研究有助于理解糖尿病的情绪方面。继续这项工作将使研究人员能够更好地理解自我管理,支持自我管理努力并取得更好的结果。