Suppr超能文献

呼吸模式会影响脑血管反应性吗?

Does breathing pattern affect cerebrovascular reactivity?

作者信息

Sayin Ece Su, Davidian Anahis, Levine Harrison, Venkatraghavan Lashmi, Mikulis David J, Fisher Joseph A, Sobczyk Olivia, Duffin James

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Management, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Department of Physiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Exp Physiol. 2022 Feb;107(2):183-191. doi: 10.1113/EP090122. Epub 2022 Jan 10.

Abstract

NEW FINDINGS

What is the central question of this study? Is cerebrovascular reactivity affected by isocapnic changes in breathing pattern? What is the main finding and its importance? Cerebrovascular reactivity does not change with isocapnic variations in tidal volume and frequency.

ABSTRACT

Deviations of arterial carbon dioxide tension from resting values affect cerebral blood vessel tone and thereby cerebral blood flow. Arterial carbon dioxide tension also affects central respiratory chemoreceptors, adjusting respiratory drive. This coincidence raises the question: does respiratory drive also affect the cerebral blood flow response to carbon dioxide? A change in cerebral blood flow for a given change in the arterial carbon dioxide tension is defined as cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR). Two studies have reached conflicting conclusions on this question, using voluntary control of breathing as a disturbing factor during measurements of CVR. Here, we address some of the methodological limitations of both studies by using sequential gas delivery and targeted control of carbon dioxide and oxygen to enable a separation of the effects of carbon dioxide on CVR from breathing vigour. We confirm that there is no detectable superimposed effect of breathing efforts on CVR.

摘要

新发现

本研究的核心问题是什么?呼吸模式的等碳酸变化是否会影响脑血管反应性?主要发现及其重要性是什么?脑血管反应性不会随潮气量和频率的等碳酸变化而改变。

摘要

动脉二氧化碳张力偏离静息值会影响脑血管张力,进而影响脑血流量。动脉二氧化碳张力还会影响中枢呼吸化学感受器,调节呼吸驱动。这种巧合引发了一个问题:呼吸驱动是否也会影响大脑对二氧化碳的血流反应?对于给定的动脉二氧化碳张力变化,脑血流量的变化被定义为脑血管反应性(CVR)。在测量CVR期间,有两项研究将呼吸的自主控制作为干扰因素,在这个问题上得出了相互矛盾的结论。在此,我们通过采用顺序气体输送以及对二氧化碳和氧气的靶向控制来解决这两项研究的一些方法学局限性,以便能够将二氧化碳对CVR的影响与呼吸力度分离开来。我们证实呼吸努力对CVR没有可检测到的叠加效应。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验