Danila Maria I, Chen Lang, Ruderman Eric M, Owensby Justin K, O'Beirne Ronan, Melnick Joshua A, Harrold Leslie R, Curtis David, Nowell W Benjamin, Curtis Jeffrey R
University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
ACR Open Rheumatol. 2022 Apr;4(4):279-287. doi: 10.1002/acr2.11393. Epub 2021 Dec 27.
This study's objective was to test whether an online video intervention discussing appropriate treatment escalation improves willingness to change treatment in people living with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
We conducted a controlled, randomized trial among patients with RA enrolled in ArthritisPower, a United States patient registry. We recruited participants by email and surveyed their assessment of disease activity (patient global), satisfaction with disease control (patient acceptable symptom state), attitudes about RA medications, decisional conflict (decisional conflict scale), and willingness to modify RA treatment (choice predisposition scale, higher scores are better) if or when recommended by their rheumatologist. Intervention groups watched educational videos relevant to a treat-to-target (T2T) strategy, whereas control groups viewed vaccination-related videos as an "attention control." We compared the between-group difference in patients' willingness to modify RA treatment (primary outcome) and difference in decisional conflict about changing RA treatment (secondary outcome) after watching the videos using t tests.
Participants with self-reported RA (n = 208) were 90% White and 90% women, with a mean (standard deviation) age of 50 (11) years, and 52% reported familiarity with the RA T2T strategy. We found a significant improvement in between-group difference in willingness to change RA treatment among intervention versus control participants (0.49 [95% confidence interval 0.09-0.88], P = 0.02). The effect size (Glass's delta) for the intervention was 0.48. Decisional conflict about treatment change decreased, but the between-group difference was not significant.
This novel educational patient-directed intervention discussing appropriate treatment escalation was associated with improved willingness to change RA treatment if or when recommended by a rheumatologist. Further studies should evaluate whether this change in patients' predisposition translates into actual treatment escalation.
本研究旨在测试一段讨论适当治疗升级的在线视频干预措施是否能提高类风湿关节炎(RA)患者改变治疗的意愿。
我们在美国患者登记系统ArthritisPower中招募RA患者,进行了一项对照随机试验。我们通过电子邮件招募参与者,并调查他们对疾病活动的评估(患者整体评估)、对疾病控制的满意度(患者可接受症状状态)、对RA药物的态度、决策冲突(决策冲突量表)以及如果或当风湿科医生建议时改变RA治疗的意愿(选择倾向量表,分数越高越好)。干预组观看与达标治疗(T2T)策略相关的教育视频,而对照组观看与疫苗接种相关的视频作为“注意力对照”。我们使用t检验比较观看视频后两组患者改变RA治疗意愿的组间差异(主要结局)以及改变RA治疗决策冲突的差异(次要结局)。
自我报告患有RA的参与者(n = 208)中,90%为白人,90%为女性,平均(标准差)年龄为50(11)岁,52%表示熟悉RA的T2T策略。我们发现干预组与对照组参与者在改变RA治疗意愿方面的组间差异有显著改善(0.49[95%置信区间0.09 - 0.88],P = 0.02)。干预的效应量(Glass's delta)为0.48。关于治疗改变的决策冲突有所减少,但组间差异不显著。
这种新颖的、以患者为导向的关于适当治疗升级的教育干预措施与在风湿科医生建议时改变RA治疗的意愿提高有关。进一步的研究应评估患者倾向的这种变化是否转化为实际的治疗升级。