Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester.
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2018 Oct;70(10):1551-1556. doi: 10.1002/acr.23508.
We conducted a 2-phase randomized controlled trial of a learning collaborative to facilitate implementation of treat-to-target (T2T) to manage rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We found substantial improvement in implementation of T2T in phase I. Here, we report on a second 9 months (phase II), where we examined the maintenance of response in phase I and predictors of greater improvement in T2T adherence.
We recruited patients from 11 rheumatology sites and randomized them to either receive the learning collaborative during phase I or to a wait-list control group that received the learning collaborative intervention during phase II. The outcome was change in T2T implementation score (0-100, where 100 = best) from pre- to postintervention. The T2T implementation score was defined as a percent of components documented in visit notes. Analyses examined the extent to which the phase-I intervention teams sustained improvement in T2T, as well as predictors of T2T improvement.
The analysis included 636 RA patients. At baseline, the mean T2T implementation score was 11% in phase I intervention sites and 13% in phase II sites. After the intervention, T2T implementation score improved to 57% in the phase I intervention sites and to 58% in the phase II sites. Intervention sites from phase I sustained the improvement during the phase II (52%). Predictors of greater T2T improvement included having only rheumatologist providers at the site, academic affiliation of the site, having fewer providers per site, and the rheumatologist provider being a trainee.
Improvement in T2T remained relatively stable over a postintervention period.
我们进行了一项两阶段随机对照试验,以学习合作的方式促进实现治疗目标(T2T)来管理类风湿关节炎(RA)。我们在第一阶段发现 T2T 的实施有了实质性的改进。在这里,我们报告第二个 9 个月(第二阶段)的情况,我们检查了第一阶段的反应维持情况以及 T2T 依从性更大改善的预测因素。
我们从 11 个风湿病站点招募患者,并将他们随机分配到第一阶段接受学习合作或等待名单对照组,在第二阶段接受学习合作干预。结果是 T2T 实施评分(0-100,其中 100=最佳)从干预前到干预后的变化。T2T 实施评分定义为就诊记录中记录的组件的百分比。分析检查了第一阶段干预团队在 T2T 方面持续改进的程度,以及 T2T 改进的预测因素。
分析包括 636 名 RA 患者。在基线时,第一阶段干预站点的 T2T 实施评分平均为 11%,第二阶段站点的 T2T 实施评分为 13%。干预后,第一阶段干预站点的 T2T 实施评分提高到 57%,第二阶段站点提高到 58%。第一阶段的干预站点在第二阶段维持了这一改进(52%)。T2T 更大改善的预测因素包括站点只有风湿病医生提供者、站点的学术隶属关系、每个站点的提供者较少,以及风湿病医生提供者是受训者。
在干预后期间,T2T 的改善相对稳定。