• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

BISAP 评分在根据修订版亚特兰大分类预测急性胰腺炎严重程度中的作用:来自土耳其的单一三级护理中心经验。

The role of the BISAP score in predicting acute pancreatitis severity according to the revised Atlanta classification: a single tertiary care unit experience from Turkey.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, University of Health Sciences, Tepecik Education and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey.

Department of Gastroenterology, Dokuz Eylül University School of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey.

出版信息

Acta Gastroenterol Belg. 2021 Oct-Dec;84(4):571-576. doi: 10.51821/84.4.007.

DOI:10.51821/84.4.007
PMID:34965038
Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: In this study, we examine the utility of Bedside Index of Severity in Acute Pancreatitis (BISAP), which is an increasingly more commonly used simple and practical novel scoring system for predicting the prognosis and severity of the disease at presentation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Consecutive patients diagnosed with AP between January 2013 and December 2020 were evaluated retrospectively. The AP severity was assessed using the revised Atlanta classification (RAC). BISAP score, demographic characteristics, pancreatitis etiology, pancreatitis history, duration of hospital stay, and mortality rates of the patients were recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 1000 adult patients were included, of whom 589 (58.9%) were female and 411 (41.1%) were male. The mean age in female and male patients was 62.15 ± 17.79 and 58.1 ± 16.33 years, respectively (p >0.05). The most common etiological factor was biliary AP (55.8%), followed by idiopathic AP (23%). Based on RAC, 389 (38.9%), 418 (41.8%), and 193 (19.3%) patients had mild, moderate, and severe AP. Of the 1000 patients, 42 (4.2%) died. Significant predictors of mortality included advanced age (>65 y) (p=0.003), hypertension (p=0.007), and ischemic heart disease (p=0.001). A BISAP score of ≥3 had a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 79.79%, 91.57%, 69.37%, and 94.99%, respectively, for determining SAP patients according to RAC.

CONCLUSION

BISAP is an effective scoring system with a high NPV in predicting the severity of AP in the early course of the disease in a Turkish population.

摘要

背景/目的:本研究旨在检验床边严重度指数(BISAP)在预测疾病发病时的预后和严重程度方面的应用价值。BISAP 是一种越来越常用的简单实用的新型评分系统。

材料和方法

回顾性评估了 2013 年 1 月至 2020 年 12 月期间连续诊断为 AP 的患者。使用修订后的亚特兰大分类(RAC)评估 AP 严重程度。记录 BISAP 评分、人口统计学特征、胰腺炎病因、胰腺炎病史、住院时间和死亡率。

结果

共纳入 1000 例成年患者,其中 589 例(58.9%)为女性,411 例(41.1%)为男性。女性和男性患者的平均年龄分别为 62.15±17.79 岁和 58.1±16.33 岁(p>0.05)。最常见的病因是胆源性 AP(55.8%),其次是特发性 AP(23%)。根据 RAC,389 例(38.9%)、418 例(41.8%)和 193 例(19.3%)患者患有轻度、中度和重度 AP。1000 例患者中,42 例(4.2%)死亡。死亡的显著预测因素包括高龄(>65 岁)(p=0.003)、高血压(p=0.007)和缺血性心脏病(p=0.001)。BISAP 评分≥3 时,根据 RAC 确定 SAP 患者的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值(NPV)分别为 79.79%、91.57%、69.37%和 94.99%。

结论

BISAP 是一种有效的评分系统,在预测土耳其人群疾病早期的 AP 严重程度方面具有较高的 NPV。

相似文献

1
The role of the BISAP score in predicting acute pancreatitis severity according to the revised Atlanta classification: a single tertiary care unit experience from Turkey.BISAP 评分在根据修订版亚特兰大分类预测急性胰腺炎严重程度中的作用:来自土耳其的单一三级护理中心经验。
Acta Gastroenterol Belg. 2021 Oct-Dec;84(4):571-576. doi: 10.51821/84.4.007.
2
Comparison of the BISAP scores for predicting the severity of acute pancreatitis in Chinese patients according to the latest Atlanta classification.根据最新亚特兰大分类法比较BISAP评分对中国急性胰腺炎患者严重程度的预测价值
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2014 Sep;21(9):689-694. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.118. Epub 2014 May 22.
3
Building and verifying a severity prediction model of acute pancreatitis (AP) based on BISAP, MEWS and routine test indexes.基于BISAP、MEWS和常规检验指标构建并验证急性胰腺炎(AP)严重程度预测模型
Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2017 Oct;41(5):585-591. doi: 10.1016/j.clinre.2016.11.013. Epub 2017 Sep 12.
4
[The comparison of different clinical scoring systems for predicting prognosis in acute pancreatitis based on the revised Atlanta classification].基于修订的亚特兰大分类法的不同临床评分系统对急性胰腺炎预后预测的比较
Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi. 2013 Aug;52(8):668-71.
5
Comparison of Bedside Index for Severity in Acute Pancreatitis and Emergency Department SpO, Age and Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome Scores in Predicting Severe Acute Pancreatitis in Patients with Acute Pancreatitis in the Emergency Department.在急诊科急性胰腺炎患者中,比较床边急性胰腺炎严重程度指数和急诊 SpO2、年龄和全身炎症反应综合征评分在预测重症急性胰腺炎中的作用。
J Emerg Med. 2024 Jul;67(1):e10-e21. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2024.03.014. Epub 2024 Mar 16.
6
[Bedside index for severity in acute pancreatitis (BISAP) score as predictor of clinical outcome in acute pancreatitis: retrospective review of 128 patients].[急性胰腺炎严重程度床边指数(BISAP)评分作为急性胰腺炎临床结局的预测指标:128例患者的回顾性研究]
Rev Med Chil. 2012 Aug;140(8):977-83. doi: 10.4067/S0034-98872012000800002.
7
Clinical significance of melatonin concentrations in predicting the severity of acute pancreatitis.褪黑素浓度预测急性胰腺炎严重程度的临床意义。
World J Gastroenterol. 2013 Jul 7;19(25):4066-71. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i25.4066.
8
Neutrophil-Creatinine Index: A New Prognostic Factor for Severity of Acute Pancreatitis.中性粒细胞-肌酐指数:急性胰腺炎严重程度的一个新的预后因素。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Apr 6;60(4):607. doi: 10.3390/medicina60040607.
9
A comparison of scoring systems and biomarkers to predict the severity of acute pancreatitis in patients referring to the emergency clinic.比较评分系统和生物标志物以预测急诊就诊的急性胰腺炎患者的严重程度。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Apr 26;103(17):e37964. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000037964.
10
[Early evaluations of BISAP plus C-reactive protein in predicting the severity of acute pancreatitis].[BISAP联合C反应蛋白对急性胰腺炎严重程度预测的早期评估]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2015 Mar 31;95(12):925-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Acute peripancreatic fluid collection in acute pancreatitis: Incidence, outcome, and association with inflammatory markers.急性胰腺炎患者胰腺周围液体积聚:发生率、转归及与炎症标志物的关系。
Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2023 Jul-Aug;29(4):225-232. doi: 10.4103/sjg.sjg_443_22.