• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阿奇霉素与感染性休克的预后

Azithromycin and Septic Shock Outcomes.

作者信息

Johnson Joseph M, Yost Raymond J, Pangrazzi Mark H, Golden Katri A, Soubani Ayman O, Wahby Krista A

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA.

Department of Pharmacy, Detroit Receiving Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA.

出版信息

J Pharm Pract. 2023 Jun;36(3):559-565. doi: 10.1177/08971900211064193. Epub 2021 Dec 30.

DOI:10.1177/08971900211064193
PMID:34967253
Abstract

Although there is evidence describing the immunomodulatory effects of macrolide antibiotics, there is little literature exploring the clinical effects these properties may have and their impact on measurable outcomes. The purpose of this study was to determine if empiric antimicrobial regimens containing azithromycin shorten time to shock resolution. A retrospective study was performed in adults with septic shock admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) of 3 university-affiliated, urban teaching hospitals between June 2012 and June 2016. Eligible patients with septic shock required treatment with norepinephrine as the first-line vasopressor for a minimum of 4 hours and received at least 48 hours of antimicrobial treatment from the time of shock onset. Propensity scores were utilized to match patients who received azithromycin to those who did not. A total of 3116 patients met initial inclusion criteria. After propensity score matching, 258 patients were included, with 124 and 134 patients in the azithromycin and control groups, respectively. Median shock duration was similar in patients treated with or without azithromycin (45.6 hr vs 59.7 hr, = .44). In-hospital mortality was also similar (37.9% vs 38.1%, = .979). There were no significant differences in mechanical ventilation duration, ICU length of stay (LOS), or hospital LOS. In patients admitted to the ICU with septic shock, empiric azithromycin did not have a significant effect on shock duration, mechanical ventilation duration, ICU LOS, hospital LOS, or in-hospital mortality.

摘要

尽管有证据描述了大环内酯类抗生素的免疫调节作用,但很少有文献探讨这些特性可能产生的临床效果及其对可测量结果的影响。本研究的目的是确定含阿奇霉素的经验性抗菌方案是否能缩短休克缓解时间。对2012年6月至2016年6月期间入住3家大学附属城市教学医院重症监护病房(ICU)的感染性休克成年患者进行了一项回顾性研究。符合条件的感染性休克患者需要使用去甲肾上腺素作为一线血管升压药治疗至少4小时,且从休克发作时起接受至少48小时的抗菌治疗。利用倾向评分将接受阿奇霉素治疗的患者与未接受阿奇霉素治疗的患者进行匹配。共有3116名患者符合初始纳入标准。倾向评分匹配后,纳入258名患者,阿奇霉素组和对照组分别有124名和134名患者。接受或未接受阿奇霉素治疗的患者的中位休克持续时间相似(45.6小时对59.7小时,P = 0.44)。住院死亡率也相似(37.9%对38.1%,P = 0.979)。机械通气时间、ICU住院时间(LOS)或医院住院时间无显著差异。在入住ICU的感染性休克患者中,经验性使用阿奇霉素对休克持续时间、机械通气时间、ICU LOS、医院LOS或住院死亡率没有显著影响。

相似文献

1
Azithromycin and Septic Shock Outcomes.阿奇霉素与感染性休克的预后
J Pharm Pract. 2023 Jun;36(3):559-565. doi: 10.1177/08971900211064193. Epub 2021 Dec 30.
2
Effect of early vasopressin combined with norepinephrine on short-term mortality in septic shock: A retrospective study based on the MIMIC-IV database.基于 MIMIC-IV 数据库的回顾性研究:早期血管加压素联合去甲肾上腺素对脓毒性休克短期死亡率的影响。
Am J Emerg Med. 2023 Jul;69:188-194. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2023.04.040. Epub 2023 May 3.
3
Clinical management for patients admitted to a critical care unit with severe sepsis or septic shock.重症监护病房收治的严重脓毒症或脓毒性休克患者的临床管理。
Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2015 Dec;31(6):359-65. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2015.04.005. Epub 2015 Aug 17.
4
Evaluating Vasopressor Discontinuation Strategies in Patients With Septic Shock on Concomitant Norepinephrine and Vasopressin Infusions.评估同时接受去甲肾上腺素和血管加压素输注的感染性休克患者的血管升压药停用策略。
Ann Pharmacother. 2018 Aug;52(8):733-739. doi: 10.1177/1060028018765187. Epub 2018 Mar 21.
5
Survival analysis of 314 episodes of sepsis in medical intensive care unit in university hospital: impact of intensive care unit performance and antimicrobial therapy.大学医院医学重症监护病房314例脓毒症发作的生存分析:重症监护病房性能及抗菌治疗的影响
Croat Med J. 2006 Jun;47(3):385-97.
6
Comparison of Early Versus Late Initiation of Hydrocortisone in Patients With Septic Shock in the ICU Setting.比较 ICU 中脓毒性休克患者早期与晚期开始使用氢化可的松的效果。
Ann Pharmacother. 2022 Mar;56(3):264-270. doi: 10.1177/10600280211021103. Epub 2021 Jun 10.
7
Impact of Ursodeoxycholic Acid in Critically Ill Patients With Sepsis: A Retrospective Study.熊去氧胆酸对脓毒症危重症患者的影响:一项回顾性研究。
J Pharm Pract. 2023 Jun;36(3):566-571. doi: 10.1177/08971900211038363. Epub 2022 Jan 4.
8
A Non-Comparative Prospective Pilot Study of Ketamine for Sedation in Adult Septic Shock.氯胺酮用于成人感染性休克镇静的非对照前瞻性初步研究。
Mil Med. 2018 Nov 1;183(11-12):e409-e413. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usy121.
9
[Predictive value of glycemic variability within 6 hours on the short-term prognosis of patients with septic shock].[脓毒性休克患者6小时内血糖变异性对短期预后的预测价值]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2021 Jan;33(1):28-32. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20200410-00274.
10
[Effect of Xuebijing on inflammatory response and prognosis in patients with septic shock].血必净对感染性休克患者炎症反应及预后的影响
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2020 Apr;32(4):458-462. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20200401-00333.

引用本文的文献

1
Macrolide Therapy in Patients with Sepsis or Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.大环内酯类药物治疗脓毒症或脓毒性休克患者:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
J Clin Med. 2025 Sep 4;14(17):6254. doi: 10.3390/jcm14176254.