Department of Conservative Dentistry, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Health Science Center, Sacred Heart University, Bauru, SP, Brazil.
Eur Endod J. 2021 Dec;6(3):284-289. doi: 10.14744/eej.2021.25238.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the bending and torsional resistance of the following instruments: Mtwo 25/.07 (MT - VDW, Munich, Germany), Navigator W-XN 25.07 (WXN - Wizard Navigator, Medin, Nové Město na Moravě, Czech Republic), ProTaper Universal SX 19/.04 (PSX - Dentsply Tulsa Dental Specialties, Tulsa, USA), MK Orifice Shapper 17/.08 (OS - MK Life Medical and Dental Products, Porto Alegre, Brazil) and MK Sequence 17.12 (MKS - MK Life Medical and Dental Products, Porto Alegre, Brazil).
One hundred instruments were used (n=20). Resistance to bending (n=10), torque and angular deflection (n=10) at the failure of new instruments were measured according to ISO 3630-1. Metal mass volume at 3 mm from the tip was evaluated using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT). The fractured surface of each fragment was examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Data were analysed using 1-way analysis of variance and Tukey tests.
Torsional resistance values of MK Sequence were higher than the other groups (P<0.05). No differences were observed among MT, WXN and OS (P>0.05) and PTS, which presented the lowest values (P<0.05). MT showed the highest angular deflection (P<0.05). WXN and PSX presented no significant difference (P>0.05). PSX and OS also showed no significant differences (P>0.05). MKS instruments had the lowest angular deflection values (P<0.05). There were significant differences among all the groups in bending stiffness test (P<0.05), but PSX had the lowest torque to bend (P<0.05). MKS had the larger metal mass volume at 3 mm from the tip (P<0.05). SEM analysis showed similar and typical features of torsional failure for all instruments tested.
In conclusion, MK Sequence 17/.12 had the highest torsional fracture resistance. Mtwo 25/.07 showed higher angular deflection capacity, and ProTaper Universal SX the 19/.04 lower bending stiffness.
本研究旨在评估以下器械的弯曲和扭转阻力:Mtwo 25/.07(MT-VDW,慕尼黑,德国)、Navigator W-XN 25.07(WXN- Wizard Navigator,Medin,Nové Město na Moravě,捷克共和国)、ProTaper Universal SX 19/.04(PSX- Dentsply Tulsa Dental Specialties,塔尔萨,美国)、MK Orifice Shapper 17/.08(OS-MK Life Medical and Dental Products,阿雷格里港,巴西)和 MK Sequence 17.12(MKS-MK Life Medical and Dental Products,阿雷格里港,巴西)。
使用了 100 根器械(n=20)。根据 ISO 3630-1 标准,测量新器械失效时的弯曲阻力(n=10)、扭矩和角偏转(n=10)。使用微计算机断层扫描(micro-CT)评估距尖端 3 毫米处的金属质量体积。通过扫描电子显微镜(SEM)检查每个碎片的断裂表面。使用单因素方差分析和 Tukey 检验对数据进行分析。
MK Sequence 的扭转阻力值高于其他组(P<0.05)。MT、WXN 和 OS 之间没有差异(P>0.05),而 PTS 的扭转阻力值最低(P<0.05)。MT 显示出最高的角偏转(P<0.05)。WXN 和 PSX 之间没有显著差异(P>0.05)。PSX 和 OS 之间也没有显著差异(P>0.05)。MKS 器械的角偏转值最低(P<0.05)。在弯曲刚度测试中,所有组之间均有显著差异(P<0.05),但 PSX 的扭矩最小(P<0.05)。MKS 器械距尖端 3 毫米处的金属质量体积最大(P<0.05)。SEM 分析显示,所有测试器械均具有相似的、典型的扭转失效特征。
总之,MK Sequence 17/.12 具有最高的扭转断裂阻力。Mtwo 25/.07 显示出更高的角偏转能力,而 ProTaper Universal SX 19/.04 则具有更低的弯曲刚度。