Department of Dermatology and Skin Science, University of British Columbia, Photomedicine Institute, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, Canada.
Departments of Cancer Control Research Program and/or Integrative Oncology-Imaging Unit, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, Canada.
Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 2022 Sep;38(5):451-458. doi: 10.1111/phpp.12768. Epub 2022 Jan 31.
Biases inherent in self-assessment of sun exposure and sun-safe behavior may lead to inaccurate conclusions about the effectiveness of sun-safety educational programs.
We aimed to compare self-reports to objective measures of sun exposure, when examining the effectiveness of passive versus active educational interventions.
From May to June 2018, 73 participants recruited at a dermatology clinic were sequentially assigned to receive sun-safety education through one of 3 modes: interactive online module, video, or no education. A baseline Sun Exposure and Behavior Inventory (SEBI) questionnaire was administered, and spectrophotometric measurements of sun-exposed and sun-protected areas were taken and reported in the CIE Lab* color space. Participants were followed 4-8 and 16 weeks after the initial visit where the SEBI was re-administered, and serial measurements of skin color were taken. The change in SEBI scores and Lab values, as calculated by the individual typology angle (ITA°), was analyzed.
There was a significant increase in skin darkening in all the groups at 4-8 and 16 weeks follow-up. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in the magnitude of color change. However, subjectively at 4-8 weeks post-intervention, participants in the interactive module and video groups had significantly improved self-reported SEBI scores compared to control (p < .05, Kruskal-Wallis). By 16 weeks, only the interactive module group showed significant improvement in SEBI scores compared to control (p < .05, ANOVA).
In determining the effectiveness of sun-safety programs, spectrophotometric evaluation of sun-induced skin pigmentation can allow for a more complete evaluation of self-reported sun exposure and sun-protective behavior.
自我评估阳光暴露和防晒行为中固有的偏差可能导致对防晒教育计划有效性的不准确结论。
我们旨在比较自我报告与阳光暴露的客观测量,当检查被动与主动教育干预的效果时。
2018 年 5 月至 6 月,在皮肤科诊所招募的 73 名参与者被连续分配接受以下 3 种方式之一的防晒教育:互动在线模块、视频或无教育。进行基线阳光暴露和行为清单(SEBI)问卷,对暴露于阳光和受保护的区域进行分光光度测量,并在 CIE Lab颜色空间中报告。参与者在初始访问后 4-8 周和 16 周进行随访,重新进行 SEBI 测量,并进行皮肤颜色的连续测量。通过个体典型角度(ITA°)计算 SEBI 评分和 La*b 值的变化。
在 4-8 周和 16 周随访时,所有组的皮肤颜色都有明显的加深。但在组间的颜色变化幅度上没有统计学差异。然而,在干预后 4-8 周时,与对照组相比,互动模块和视频组的参与者自我报告的 SEBI 评分有显著改善(p<0.05,Kruskal-Wallis)。到 16 周时,只有互动模块组的 SEBI 评分与对照组相比有显著改善(p<0.05,ANOVA)。
在确定防晒计划的有效性时,阳光诱导的皮肤色素沉着的分光光度评估可以更全面地评估自我报告的阳光暴露和防晒行为。