• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

RENAL 评分中新的纵向分量预测经腹腔机器人辅助部分肾切除术的手术复杂性。

New Longitudinal Component of the RENAL Nephrometry Score for Predicting the Operative Complexity in Transperitoneal Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Saiseikai Kazo Hospital, Saitama, Japan.

Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

J Endourol. 2022 Jun;36(6):762-769. doi: 10.1089/end.2021.0716.

DOI:10.1089/end.2021.0716
PMID:34969256
Abstract

In transperitoneal robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN), an L score of 3 points according to the RENAL nephrometry scoring system does not necessarily denote operative complexity. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of the newly defined longitudinal component to analyze the operative complexity of RAPN. We retrospectively analyzed transperitoneal RAPNs performed by a single experienced surgeon for renal tumors between 2017 and 2020. L component was defined as L'1 for midlocated tumors, L'2 for >50% below the polar line, and L'3 for >50% above the polar line. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to test associations between prolonged console time and preoperative factors. The perioperative outcomes were compared among the three cohorts of L' components using propensity score matching: L'1 L'3 and L'1 L'2. A total of 220 cases (L'1: 107, L'2: 65, L'3: 48) were analyzed. The median console time was prolonged (>130 minutes) in 55 patients (median 108, interquartile range: 90-130 minutes). Longitudinal location (L'3 odds ratio [OR]: 2.93,  = 0.01; L'2 OR: 2.32,  = 0.04), high Mayo adhesive probability score ( = 0.001), multiple renal arteries ( = 0.03), and large size ( = 0.04) were significantly associated with prolonged console time. After matching, 26 cases of L'1 and L'3 and 43 cases of L'1 and L'2 were selected. Console time (108 minutes 132 minutes,  = 0.017) and warm ischemia time (17 minutes 22 minutes,  = 0.03) were significantly longer in L'3 than in L'1. The difference in console time between L'1 and L'2 was not statistically significant (100 minutes 111 minutes,  = 0.08). In the new longitudinal assessment, upper location predicted prolonged console time compared with a middle or lower location. The L' component may help preoperatively assess operative complexity.

摘要

在经腹腔机器人辅助部分肾切除术(RAPN)中,根据 RENAL 肾肿瘤评分系统,3 分的 L 评分不一定表示手术的复杂性。本研究旨在评估新定义的纵向成分对 RAPN 手术复杂性的分析效果。我们回顾性分析了 2017 年至 2020 年间由一位经验丰富的外科医生为肾肿瘤进行的经腹腔 RAPN。L 成分定义为中部位肿瘤的 L'1、极线下 50%以上的 L'2 和极线上 50%以上的 L'3。多变量回归分析用于测试延长控制台时间与术前因素之间的关联。使用倾向评分匹配比较三个 L'成分队列的围手术期结果:L'1 与 L'3、L'1 与 L'2。共分析了 220 例(L'1:107 例,L'2:65 例,L'3:48 例)。55 例(中位 108 分,四分位距:90-130 分)的控制台时间延长(>130 分钟)。纵向位置(L'3 比值比 [OR]:2.93, = 0.01;L'2 OR:2.32, = 0.04)、高 Mayo 粘连概率评分( = 0.001)、多发肾动脉( = 0.03)和大体积( = 0.04)与延长控制台时间显著相关。匹配后,选择了 26 例 L'1 与 L'3 和 43 例 L'1 与 L'2。L'3 的控制台时间(108 分钟 132 分钟, = 0.017)和热缺血时间(17 分钟 22 分钟, = 0.03)明显长于 L'1。L'1 与 L'2 的控制台时间差异无统计学意义(100 分钟 111 分钟, = 0.08)。在新的纵向评估中,与中或下位置相比,上位置预测了延长的控制台时间。L 成分可能有助于术前评估手术的复杂性。

相似文献

1
New Longitudinal Component of the RENAL Nephrometry Score for Predicting the Operative Complexity in Transperitoneal Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy.RENAL 评分中新的纵向分量预测经腹腔机器人辅助部分肾切除术的手术复杂性。
J Endourol. 2022 Jun;36(6):762-769. doi: 10.1089/end.2021.0716.
2
Predictive Factors for Achieving Superior Pentafecta Outcomes Following Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy in Patients with Localized Renal Cell Carcinoma.局限性肾细胞癌患者机器人辅助部分肾切除术后实现卓越五联疗效的预测因素
J Endourol. 2017 Dec;31(12):1231-1236. doi: 10.1089/end.2017.0369. Epub 2017 Nov 20.
3
Comparisons of surgical outcomes between transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approaches in robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for lateral renal tumors: a propensity score-matched comparative analysis.机器人辅助腹腔镜下肾外侧肿瘤部分肾切除术经腹腔与经腹膜后入路手术效果的比较:一项倾向评分匹配的对比分析
J Robot Surg. 2021 Feb;15(1):99-104. doi: 10.1007/s11701-020-01086-3. Epub 2020 May 1.
4
Comparison of Trifecta and Pentafecta Outcomes between T1a and T1b Renal Masses following Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy (RAPN) with Minimum One Year Follow Up: Can RAPN for T1b Renal Masses Be Feasible?机器人辅助部分肾切除术(RAPN)后T1a和T1b肾肿块的三联和五联结局比较:至少随访一年:T1b肾肿块的RAPN是否可行?
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 17;11(3):e0151738. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151738. eCollection 2016.
5
Comparison of Kidney Function in the Early Postoperative Period in Transperitoneal Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy Between Anterior and Posterior Renal Tumors: A Propensity Score-Matched Study.经腹腔机器人辅助腹腔镜下肾肿瘤前后位肾部分切除术术后早期肾功能的比较:一项倾向评分匹配研究
J Endourol. 2018 Feb;32(2):111-115. doi: 10.1089/end.2017.0654. Epub 2017 Dec 11.
6
Simplified PADUA Renal (SPARE) Nephrometry Scoring System: External Validation, Interobserver Variability, and Comparison with RENAL and PADUA in a Single-center Robotic Partial Nephrectomy Series.简化 Padua 肾脏(SPARE)肾肿瘤评分系统:单中心机器人辅助部分肾切除术系列中的外部验证、观察者间变异性以及与 RENAL 和 Padua 的比较。
Eur Urol Focus. 2021 May;7(3):591-597. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2020.05.016. Epub 2020 Jun 23.
7
Predictors for trifecta achievement of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy in high-complexity tumors (Preoperative Aspects and Dimensions Used for an Anatomical score ≥10).机器人辅助部分肾切除术在高复杂性肿瘤中实现三联征的预测因素(术前方面和用于解剖评分的维度 ≥10)。
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2020 Jul;13(3):390-396. doi: 10.1111/ases.12767. Epub 2019 Dec 10.
8
Initial learning curve for robot-assisted partial nephrectomy performed by a single experienced robotic surgeon.由一位经验丰富的机器人外科医生进行机器人辅助部分肾切除术的初始学习曲线。
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2020 Jan;13(1):59-64. doi: 10.1111/ases.12683. Epub 2019 Jan 28.
9
PADUA and R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry scores correlate with perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: analysis of the Vattikuti Global Quality Initiative in Robotic Urologic Surgery (GQI-RUS) database.PADUA和R.E.N.A.L.肾计量评分与机器人辅助部分肾切除术的围手术期结果相关:Vattikuti全球机器人泌尿外科手术质量倡议(GQI-RUS)数据库分析
BJU Int. 2017 Mar;119(3):456-463. doi: 10.1111/bju.13628. Epub 2016 Sep 11.
10
Comparison of the transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approach in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy in an initial case series in Japan.在日本的初步病例系列中,比较机器人辅助部分肾切除术经腹腔和腹膜后入路的效果。
J Endourol. 2013 Nov;27(11):1384-8. doi: 10.1089/end.2012.0641. Epub 2013 Sep 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of differences in intraoperative blood loss between left-sided and right-sided robot-assisted partial nephrectomy.左侧与右侧机器人辅助部分肾切除术术中失血差异的比较。
J Robot Surg. 2025 May 20;19(1):224. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02380-8.