• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年子宫内膜癌患者行微创手术后的生存情况。

Survival After Minimally Invasive Surgery in Older Women With Endometrial Carcinoma.

机构信息

Department of Gynecology. Division Gynecologic Oncology, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL, U.S.A.

Division of Quantitative Science and Biostatistics Shared Resource, University of Florida Health Cancer Center, Gainesville, FL, U.S.A.

出版信息

Anticancer Res. 2022 Jan;42(1):75-85. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.15459.

DOI:10.21873/anticanres.15459
PMID:34969711
Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIM: To analyze the impact of minimally invasive surgery for endometrial cancer on overall survival among age >65.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We examined women who underwent hysterectomy from 2010 to 2015 from the U.S. National Cancer Data Base (NCDB). We evaluated the impact of surgical approach on survival.

RESULTS

Of 243,601 endometrial cancer cases, 42,458 met the inclusion criteria. Laparoscopic approach was associated with improved survival by 14% (HR=0.86; 95%CI=0.80-0.92; p<0.001) and robotic approach was associated with improved survival by 12% (HR=0.88; 95%CI=0.83-0.93; p<0.0001), compared to the open approach. Similarly, the weighted adjusted 5-year overall survival was 73.1% (95%CI=72%-74.2%), 76.4% (95%CI=75.1-77.7%), and 75.5% (95%CI=74.7-76.4%) for open, laparoscopic, and robotic approaches, respectively (p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Minimally invasive surgery improved overall survival in women over 65 years with endometrial cancer.

摘要

背景/目的:分析子宫内膜癌微创手术对 65 岁以上患者总生存率的影响。

患者和方法

我们研究了 2010 年至 2015 年期间美国国家癌症数据库(NCDB)中接受子宫切除术的女性。我们评估了手术方式对生存的影响。

结果

在 243601 例子宫内膜癌病例中,42458 例符合纳入标准。与开放手术相比,腹腔镜手术使生存率提高了 14%(HR=0.86;95%CI=0.80-0.92;p<0.001),机器人手术使生存率提高了 12%(HR=0.88;95%CI=0.83-0.93;p<0.0001)。同样,加权调整后的 5 年总生存率分别为开放、腹腔镜和机器人手术组的 73.1%(95%CI=72%-74.2%)、76.4%(95%CI=75.1-77.7%)和 75.5%(95%CI=74.7-76.4%)(p<0.001)。

结论

对于 65 岁以上患有子宫内膜癌的女性,微创手术可提高总体生存率。

相似文献

1
Survival After Minimally Invasive Surgery in Older Women With Endometrial Carcinoma.老年子宫内膜癌患者行微创手术后的生存情况。
Anticancer Res. 2022 Jan;42(1):75-85. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.15459.
2
Use and outcomes of minimally invasive hysterectomy for women with nonendometrioid endometrial cancers.非子宫内膜样腺癌患者行微创子宫切除术的应用及效果。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Nov;219(5):463.e1-463.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.07.028. Epub 2018 Aug 4.
3
Outcomes of minimally invasive surgery for patients with endometrial carcinoma involving the cervix.经宫颈累及的子宫内膜癌患者行微创手术的结果。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2020 May;30(5):619-625. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2019-001023. Epub 2020 Apr 9.
4
Comparison of survival and complications between minimally invasive and open staging surgeries in non-endometrioid endometrial cancer.非子宫内膜样型子宫内膜癌的微创与开放分期手术的生存与并发症比较。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2024 Oct;50(10):108584. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2024.108584. Epub 2024 Aug 10.
5
Venous Thromboembolism in Minimally Invasive Compared With Open Hysterectomy for Endometrial Cancer.与开放性子宫切除术相比,微创子宫内膜癌手术中的静脉血栓栓塞情况
Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Jul;128(1):121-126. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001492.
6
Minimally Invasive Compared With Open Hysterectomy in High-Risk Endometrial Cancer.与开放性子宫切除术相比,高危子宫内膜癌的微创治疗。
Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Dec 1;138(6):828-837. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004606.
7
Survival after a nationwide introduction of robotic surgery in women with early-stage endometrial cancer: a population-based prospective cohort study.全国范围内早期子宫内膜癌患者接受机器人手术治疗后的生存情况:一项基于人群的前瞻性队列研究。
Eur J Cancer. 2019 Mar;109:1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.12.004. Epub 2019 Jan 14.
8
Impact of age on surgical staging and approaches (laparotomy, laparoscopy and robotic surgery) in endometrial cancer management.年龄对子宫内膜癌治疗中手术分期及手术方式(剖腹手术、腹腔镜手术和机器人手术)的影响。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2017 Apr;43(4):703-709. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.10.022. Epub 2016 Nov 27.
9
Impact of surgical approach on prevalence of positive peritoneal cytology and lymph-vascular invasion in patients with early-stage endometrial carcinoma: a National Cancer Database study.手术入路对早期子宫内膜癌患者腹膜细胞学阳性和脉管侵犯率的影响:一项全国癌症数据库研究。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2021 Jul;31(7):1001-1006. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2021-002445. Epub 2021 Apr 14.
10
Oncologic outcomes for patients with endometrial cancer who received minimally invasive surgery: a retrospective observational study.接受微创手术的子宫内膜癌患者的肿瘤学结果:一项回顾性观察研究。
Int J Clin Oncol. 2020 Nov;25(11):1985-1994. doi: 10.1007/s10147-020-01744-4. Epub 2020 Jul 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Hysterectomy for oncological and non-oncological reasons in patients over 70 years of age - comparison of robot-assisted, laparoscopic, and open approaches.70岁以上患者因肿瘤和非肿瘤原因进行子宫切除术——机器人辅助、腹腔镜和开放手术方式的比较
J Robot Surg. 2025 Aug 19;19(1):497. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02676-9.
2
Minimally Invasive Surgery With Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping in Elderly Patients With Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer: A Subgroup Analysis of a Prospective Cohort Study.早期子宫内膜癌老年患者的前哨淋巴结定位微创手术:一项前瞻性队列研究的亚组分析
Cureus. 2025 Jul 2;17(7):e87200. doi: 10.7759/cureus.87200. eCollection 2025 Jul.
3
Impact of surgical approach on progress of disease by type of histology in stage IA endometrial cancer: a matched-pair analysis.
手术方式对 IA 期子宫内膜癌不同组织学分型疾病进展的影响:一项配对分析。
BMC Surg. 2024 Jan 3;24(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s12893-023-02299-7.