• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

危重症儿童快速基因组测序的同意书:法律和伦理问题。

Consent for rapid genomic sequencing for critically ill children: legal and ethical issues.

机构信息

Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.

Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

Monash Bioeth Rev. 2021 Dec;39(Suppl 1):117-129. doi: 10.1007/s40592-021-00146-0. Epub 2021 Dec 31.

DOI:10.1007/s40592-021-00146-0
PMID:34971444
Abstract

Although rapid genomic sequencing (RGS) is improving care for critically ill children with rare disease, it also raises important ethical questions that need to be explored as its use becomes more widespread. Two such questions relate to the degree of consent that should be required for RGS to proceed and whether it might ever be appropriate to override parents' decisions not to allow RGS to be performed in their critically ill child. To explore these questions, we first examine the legal frameworks on securing consent for genomic sequencing and how they apply to the specific context of RGS for critically ill children. We then use a tool from clinical ethics, the Zone of Parental Discretion, to explore two case studies and identify under which circumstances it might be appropriate for parental refusal of RGS to be overridden. We argue that RGS may be a context where, in addition to assessing the complexity of the test offered, it is ethically appropriate to consider an effect on patient outcomes when deciding the degree of consent required. We also suggest that there are some contexts where it may be ethically justified to perform RGS, even when it is actively against the wishes of the parents. More work is needed to examine exactly how 'time-sensitive' exceptions to current guidance on consent for genomic sequencing could be formulated and operationalised for RGS for critically ill-children.

摘要

虽然快速基因组测序(RGS)正在改善对患有罕见病的重症儿童的护理,但随着其应用的日益广泛,也提出了一些需要探讨的重要伦理问题。其中两个问题涉及到进行 RGS 所需的同意程度,以及在何种情况下,是否可以无视父母不同意对其重症患儿进行 RGS 的决定。为了探讨这些问题,我们首先考察了保障基因组测序同意的法律框架,以及它们如何适用于对重症儿童进行 RGS 的具体情况。然后,我们使用临床伦理工具“父母裁量权区域”来探讨两个案例研究,并确定在何种情况下,父母拒绝进行 RGS 可能被推翻。我们认为,RGS 可能是一种情况,除了评估所提供测试的复杂性外,在决定所需同意程度时,还需要考虑对患者结果的影响,这在伦理上是合适的。我们还认为,在某些情况下,即使这与父母的意愿相违背,从伦理角度来看,进行 RGS 可能是合理的。需要进一步研究如何为重症儿童的 RGS 制定并实施当前关于基因组测序同意的“时间敏感”例外情况。

相似文献

1
Consent for rapid genomic sequencing for critically ill children: legal and ethical issues.危重症儿童快速基因组测序的同意书:法律和伦理问题。
Monash Bioeth Rev. 2021 Dec;39(Suppl 1):117-129. doi: 10.1007/s40592-021-00146-0. Epub 2021 Dec 31.
2
Parents' experiences of decision making for rapid genomic sequencing in intensive care.父母在重症监护中对快速基因组测序决策的体验。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2021 Dec;29(12):1804-1810. doi: 10.1038/s41431-021-00950-6. Epub 2021 Aug 23.
3
Delivering genome sequencing for rapid genetic diagnosis in critically ill children: parent and professional views, experiences and challenges.为危重症儿童提供快速基因诊断的基因组测序:家长和专业人员的观点、经验和挑战。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2020 Nov;28(11):1529-1540. doi: 10.1038/s41431-020-0667-z. Epub 2020 Jun 19.
4
Moving from 'fully' to 'appropriately' informed consent in genomics: The PROMICE framework.从“完全”知情同意到“适当”知情同意在基因组学中的转变:PROMICE 框架。
Bioethics. 2022 Jul;36(6):655-665. doi: 10.1111/bioe.13027. Epub 2022 Apr 7.
5
Rapid Genome Sequencing: Consent for New Technologies in the Neonatal Intensive Care Context.快速基因组测序:新生儿重症监护环境下对新技术的同意
Pediatrics. 2022 Dec 1;150(6). doi: 10.1542/peds.2022-058222.
6
A Prospective Study of Parental Perceptions of Rapid Whole-Genome and -Exome Sequencing among Seriously Ill Infants.一项针对重症婴儿家长对快速全基因组和外显子组测序认知的前瞻性研究。
Am J Hum Genet. 2020 Nov 5;107(5):953-962. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2020.10.004.
7
Implementation of rapid genomic sequencing in safety-net neonatal intensive care units: protocol for the VIrtual GenOme CenteR (VIGOR) proof-of-concept study.安全网新生儿重症监护病房快速基因组测序的实施:虚拟基因组中心(VIGOR)概念验证研究的方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Feb 6;14(2):e080529. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080529.
8
Re-evaluating ethical concerns in planned emergency research involving critically ill patients: an interpretation of the guidance document from the United States Food and Drug Administration.重新评估涉及重症患者的计划性紧急研究中的伦理问题:对美国食品药品监督管理局指导文件的解读
J Clin Ethics. 2015 Spring;26(1):61-7.
9
Is the concept of informed consent applicable to clinical research involving critically ill patients?知情同意的概念是否适用于涉及重症患者的临床研究?
Crit Care Med. 2003 Mar;31(3 Suppl):S153-60. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000054901.80339.01.
10
Intensive Care Clinicians' Perspectives on Ethical Challenges Raised by Rapid Genomic Testing in Critically Ill Infants.重症监护临床医生对危重症婴儿快速基因组检测引发的伦理挑战的看法。
Children (Basel). 2023 May 30;10(6):970. doi: 10.3390/children10060970.

引用本文的文献

1
Research Ethics Challenges, Controversies and Difficulties in Intensive Care Units-A Systematic Review of Theoretical Concepts.重症监护病房中的研究伦理挑战、争议与困难——理论概念的系统综述
Nurs Rep. 2025 May 7;15(5):164. doi: 10.3390/nursrep15050164.
2
Rapid genomic testing in critically ill patients with genetic conditions: position statement by the Human Genetics Society of Australasia.危重症遗传疾病患者的快速基因组检测:澳大拉西亚人类遗传学学会立场声明。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2024 Feb;32(2):150-154. doi: 10.1038/s41431-023-01477-8. Epub 2023 Oct 20.
3
Are We Ready for Whole Population Genomic Sequencing of Asymptomatic Newborns?
我们是否准备好对无症状新生儿进行全人群基因组测序?
Pharmgenomics Pers Med. 2023 Jul 1;16:681-691. doi: 10.2147/PGPM.S376083. eCollection 2023.
4
Intensive Care Clinicians' Perspectives on Ethical Challenges Raised by Rapid Genomic Testing in Critically Ill Infants.重症监护临床医生对危重症婴儿快速基因组检测引发的伦理挑战的看法。
Children (Basel). 2023 May 30;10(6):970. doi: 10.3390/children10060970.
5
Two-step offer and return of multiple types of additional genomic findings to families after ultrarapid trio genomic testing in the acute care setting: a study protocol.两步式提供和返回多种额外基因组发现给家庭后 ultrarapid 三人基因组测试在急性护理环境:一项研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jun 2;13(6):e072999. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072999.