• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重症监护临床医生对危重症婴儿快速基因组检测引发的伦理挑战的看法。

Intensive Care Clinicians' Perspectives on Ethical Challenges Raised by Rapid Genomic Testing in Critically Ill Infants.

作者信息

Poogoda Sachini, Lynch Fiona, Stark Zornitza, Wilkinson Dominic, Savulescu Julian, Vears Danya, Gyngell Christopher

机构信息

Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia.

Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia.

出版信息

Children (Basel). 2023 May 30;10(6):970. doi: 10.3390/children10060970.

DOI:10.3390/children10060970
PMID:37371202
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10297108/
Abstract

Rapid genomic testing (rGT) enables genomic information to be available in a matter of hours, allowing it to be used in time-critical settings, such as intensive care units. Although rGT has been shown to improve diagnostic rates in a cost-effective manner, it raises ethical questions around a range of different areas, including obtaining consent and clinical decision-making. While some research has examined the perspectives of parents and genetics health professionals, the attitudes of intensive care clinicians remain under-explored. To address this gap, we administered an online survey to English-speaking neonatal/paediatric intensivists in Europe, Australasia and North America. We posed two ethical scenarios: one relating to obtaining consent from the parents and the second assessing decision-making regarding the provision of life-sustaining treatments. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse the data. We received 40 responses from 12 countries. About 50-75% of intensivists felt that explicit parental consent was necessary for rGT. About 68-95% felt that a diagnosis from rGT should affect the provision of life-sustaining care. Results were mediated by intensivists' level of experience. Our findings show divergent attitudes toward ethical issues generated by rGT among intensivists and suggest the need for guidance regarding ethical decision-making for rGT.

摘要

快速基因组检测(rGT)能在数小时内提供基因组信息,使其可用于诸如重症监护病房等对时间要求严格的场景。尽管rGT已被证明能以具有成本效益的方式提高诊断率,但它在一系列不同领域引发了伦理问题,包括获得同意和临床决策。虽然一些研究探讨了父母和遗传学健康专业人员的观点,但重症监护临床医生的态度仍未得到充分研究。为了填补这一空白,我们对欧洲、澳大拉西亚和北美的英语新生儿/儿科重症监护医生进行了一项在线调查。我们提出了两个伦理情景:一个与获得父母的同意有关,另一个评估关于提供维持生命治疗的决策。使用描述性统计分析数据。我们收到了来自12个国家的40份回复。约50 - 75%的重症监护医生认为rGT需要获得父母明确同意。约68 - 95%的人认为rGT的诊断应影响维持生命护理的提供。结果受重症监护医生经验水平的影响。我们的研究结果表明,重症监护医生对rGT引发的伦理问题态度不一,并表明需要针对rGT的伦理决策提供指导。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d11c/10297108/149e3ffa46bf/children-10-00970-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d11c/10297108/149e3ffa46bf/children-10-00970-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d11c/10297108/149e3ffa46bf/children-10-00970-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Intensive Care Clinicians' Perspectives on Ethical Challenges Raised by Rapid Genomic Testing in Critically Ill Infants.重症监护临床医生对危重症婴儿快速基因组检测引发的伦理挑战的看法。
Children (Basel). 2023 May 30;10(6):970. doi: 10.3390/children10060970.
2
Consent for rapid genomic sequencing for critically ill children: legal and ethical issues.危重症儿童快速基因组测序的同意书:法律和伦理问题。
Monash Bioeth Rev. 2021 Dec;39(Suppl 1):117-129. doi: 10.1007/s40592-021-00146-0. Epub 2021 Dec 31.
3
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
4
Attitudes of Australian health professionals towards rapid genomic testing in neonatal and paediatric intensive care.澳大利亚卫生专业人员对新生儿和儿科重症监护中快速基因组检测的态度。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2019 Oct;27(10):1493-1501. doi: 10.1038/s41431-019-0429-y. Epub 2019 May 31.
5
Rapid Genomic Testing in Intensive Care: Health Professionals' Perspectives on Ethical Challenges.重症监护中的快速基因组检测:卫生专业人员对伦理挑战的看法。
Children (Basel). 2023 May 1;10(5):824. doi: 10.3390/children10050824.
6
A Prospective Study of Parental Perceptions of Rapid Whole-Genome and -Exome Sequencing among Seriously Ill Infants.一项针对重症婴儿家长对快速全基因组和外显子组测序认知的前瞻性研究。
Am J Hum Genet. 2020 Nov 5;107(5):953-962. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2020.10.004.
7
Nonconsented human immunodeficiency virus testing among critically ill patients: intensivists' practices and the influence of state laws.重症患者中未经同意的人类免疫缺陷病毒检测:重症监护医生的做法及州法律的影响
Arch Intern Med. 2007 Nov 26;167(21):2323-8. doi: 10.1001/archinte.167.21.2323.
8
Parents' experiences of transition when their infants are discharged from the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: a systematic review protocol.婴儿从新生儿重症监护病房出院时父母的过渡经历:一项系统综述方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):123-32. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2287.
9
The care of critically ill infants and toddlers in neonatal intensive care units across Italy and Europe: our proposal for healthcare organization.意大利和欧洲各新生儿重症监护病房危重新生儿和幼儿的护理:我们的医疗保健组织建议。
Eur J Pediatr. 2022 Apr;181(4):1385-1393. doi: 10.1007/s00431-021-04349-9. Epub 2022 Jan 28.
10
Ethical Issues in Surgical Critical Care: The Complexity of Interpersonal Relationships in the Surgical Intensive Care Unit.外科重症监护中的伦理问题:外科重症监护病房中人际关系的复杂性
J Intensive Care Med. 2016 Aug;31(7):442-50. doi: 10.1177/0885066615585953. Epub 2015 May 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Research Ethics Challenges, Controversies and Difficulties in Intensive Care Units-A Systematic Review of Theoretical Concepts.重症监护病房中的研究伦理挑战、争议与困难——理论概念的系统综述
Nurs Rep. 2025 May 7;15(5):164. doi: 10.3390/nursrep15050164.
2
Rapid Whole-Genome Sequencing in Critically Ill Infants and Children with Suspected, Undiagnosed Genetic Diseases: Evolution to a First-Tier Clinical Laboratory Test in the Era of Precision Medicine.对疑似患有未确诊遗传病的危重症婴幼儿进行快速全基因组测序:在精准医学时代向一线临床实验室检测的演变。
Children (Basel). 2025 Mar 28;12(4):429. doi: 10.3390/children12040429.

本文引用的文献

1
Rapid Genomic Testing in Intensive Care: Health Professionals' Perspectives on Ethical Challenges.重症监护中的快速基因组检测:卫生专业人员对伦理挑战的看法。
Children (Basel). 2023 May 1;10(5):824. doi: 10.3390/children10050824.
2
Reclassification of the Etiology of Infant Mortality With Whole-Genome Sequencing.全基因组测序对婴儿死亡率病因的重新分类。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Feb 1;6(2):e2254069. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.54069.
3
Rapid Genome Sequencing: Consent for New Technologies in the Neonatal Intensive Care Context.
快速基因组测序:新生儿重症监护环境下对新技术的同意
Pediatrics. 2022 Dec 1;150(6). doi: 10.1542/peds.2022-058222.
4
Rapid Whole Genome Sequencing in Critically Ill Neonates Enables Precision Medicine Pipeline.危重新生儿的快速全基因组测序助力精准医疗流程。
J Pers Med. 2022 Nov 18;12(11):1924. doi: 10.3390/jpm12111924.
5
Critical care practices in the world: Results of the global intensive care unit need assessment survey 2020.全球危重症护理实践:2020年全球重症监护病房需求评估调查结果
World J Crit Care Med. 2022 May 9;11(3):169-177. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v11.i3.169.
6
Rapid genome sequencing for pediatrics.儿科快速基因组测序。
Hum Mutat. 2022 Nov;43(11):1507-1518. doi: 10.1002/humu.24466. Epub 2022 Sep 23.
7
'Diagnostic shock': the impact of results from ultrarapid genomic sequencing of critically unwell children on aspects of family functioning.“诊断性休克”:超快速基因组测序对危重症儿童家庭功能方面的影响。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2022 Sep;30(9):1036-1043. doi: 10.1038/s41431-022-01140-8. Epub 2022 Jul 13.
8
Is faster better? An economic evaluation of rapid and ultra-rapid genomic testing in critically ill infants and children.更快更好吗?危重症婴儿和儿童快速和超快速基因组检测的经济评估。
Genet Med. 2022 May;24(5):1037-1044. doi: 10.1016/j.gim.2022.01.013. Epub 2022 Feb 16.
9
A Global Survey of the Effect of COVID-19 on Critical Care Training.一项关于新冠疫情对重症监护培训影响的全球调查。
ATS Sch. 2021 Oct 21;2(4):508-520. doi: 10.34197/ats-scholar.2021-0045BR. eCollection 2021 Dec.
10
Consent for rapid genomic sequencing for critically ill children: legal and ethical issues.危重症儿童快速基因组测序的同意书:法律和伦理问题。
Monash Bioeth Rev. 2021 Dec;39(Suppl 1):117-129. doi: 10.1007/s40592-021-00146-0. Epub 2021 Dec 31.