• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

互惠共生相互作用中有效性景观的生态和进化意义。

The ecological and evolutionary significance of effectiveness landscapes in mutualistic interactions.

机构信息

Departamento de Ecología Funcional y Evolutiva, Estación Experimental de Zonas Áridas (EEZA- CSIC), Almería, Spain.

Department of Wildland Resources and Ecology Center, S. J. and Jesse E. Quinney College of Natural Resources, Utah State University, Logan, Utah, USA.

出版信息

Ecol Lett. 2022 Feb;25(2):264-277. doi: 10.1111/ele.13939. Epub 2021 Dec 31.

DOI:10.1111/ele.13939
PMID:34971487
Abstract

Mutualism effectiveness, the contribution of an interacting organism to its partner's fitness, is defined as the number of immediate outcomes of the interactions (quantity component) multiplied by the probability that an immediate outcome results in a new individual (quality component). These components form a two-dimensional effectiveness landscape with each species' location determined by its values of quantity (x-axis) and quality (y-axis). We propose that the evolutionary history of mutualistic interactions leaves a footprint that can be identified by three properties of the spatial structure of effectiveness values: dispersion of effectiveness values, relative contribution of each component to the effectiveness values and correlation between effectiveness components. We illustrate this approach using a large dataset on synzoochory, seed dispersal by seed-caching animals. The synzoochory landscape was clumped, with effectiveness determined primarily by the quality component, and with quantity and quality positively correlated. We suggest this type of landscape structure is common in generalised coevolved mutualisms, where multiple functionally equivalent, high-quality partners exert similarly strong selection. Presumably, only those organisms located in high-quality regions will impact the evolution of their partner. Exploring properties of effectiveness landscapes in other mutualisms will provide new insight into the evolutionary and ecological consequences of mutualisms.

摘要

互作有效性是指一个相互作用的生物体对其伙伴适应度的贡献,它被定义为相互作用的直接结果数量(数量成分)乘以直接结果产生新个体的概率(质量成分)。这两个成分构成了一个二维有效性景观,每个物种的位置由其数量(x 轴)和质量(y 轴)的值决定。我们提出,互利相互作用的进化历史留下了一个可以通过有效性值的空间结构的三个特性来识别的足迹:有效性值的分散程度、每个成分对有效性值的相对贡献以及有效性成分之间的相关性。我们使用一个关于种子与动物共播(seed caching animals)的大型数据集来说明这种方法。synzoochory 景观呈块状,有效性主要由质量成分决定,数量和质量呈正相关。我们认为,这种类型的景观结构在广义共进化的互利关系中很常见,其中多个功能等效、高质量的伙伴施加类似的强选择。大概只有那些位于高质量区域的生物体才会影响它们伙伴的进化。探索其他互利关系中有效性景观的特性将为互利关系的进化和生态后果提供新的见解。

相似文献

1
The ecological and evolutionary significance of effectiveness landscapes in mutualistic interactions.互惠共生相互作用中有效性景观的生态和进化意义。
Ecol Lett. 2022 Feb;25(2):264-277. doi: 10.1111/ele.13939. Epub 2021 Dec 31.
2
A general framework for effectiveness concepts in mutualisms.共生关系中有效性概念的一般框架。
Ecol Lett. 2017 May;20(5):577-590. doi: 10.1111/ele.12764. Epub 2017 Mar 28.
3
Indirect effects drive coevolution in mutualistic networks.间接效应驱动互惠共生网络中的协同进化。
Nature. 2017 Oct 26;550(7677):511-514. doi: 10.1038/nature24273. Epub 2017 Oct 18.
4
Reciprocity and interaction effectiveness in generalised mutualisms among free-living species.自由生活物种间广义共生中的相互作用和相互影响效率。
Ecol Lett. 2023 Jan;26(1):132-146. doi: 10.1111/ele.14141. Epub 2022 Nov 30.
5
Moving from frugivory to seed dispersal: Incorporating the functional outcomes of interactions in plant-frugivore networks.从食果性到种子传播:将植物-食果动物网络中相互作用的功能结果纳入其中。
J Anim Ecol. 2018 Jul;87(4):995-1007. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12831. Epub 2018 Apr 20.
6
Small mammal personalities generate context dependence in the seed dispersal mutualism.小型哺乳动物个性在种子扩散共生关系中产生情境依赖性。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Apr 12;119(15):e2113870119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2113870119. Epub 2022 Apr 4.
7
Interacting guilds: moving beyond the pairwise perspective on mutualisms.相互作用的功能群:超越互利共生的两两视角
Am Nat. 2003 Oct;162(4 Suppl):S10-23. doi: 10.1086/378646.
8
Coevolution in variable mutualisms.可变互利共生中的协同进化。
Am Nat. 2003 Oct;162(4 Suppl):S80-93. doi: 10.1086/378705.
9
Mutualisms impact species' range expansion speeds and spatial distributions.互利共生关系影响物种的扩散速度和空间分布。
Ecology. 2024 Jan;105(1):e4171. doi: 10.1002/ecy.4171. Epub 2023 Nov 20.
10
Interactions between seed-dispersing ant species affect plant community composition in field mesocosms.散播种子的蚂蚁物种之间的相互作用会影响田间中观模型中的植物群落组成。
J Anim Ecol. 2020 Nov;89(11):2485-2495. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.13310. Epub 2020 Sep 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Pollination effectiveness affects the level of generalisation of a plant species with phenotypically plastic flowers.传粉有效性影响具有表型可塑性花朵的植物物种的泛化水平。
AoB Plants. 2025 Jan 10;17(3):plae065. doi: 10.1093/aobpla/plae065. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
What drives seed dispersal effectiveness?是什么驱动了种子传播的有效性?
Ecol Evol. 2023 Aug 31;13(9):e10459. doi: 10.1002/ece3.10459. eCollection 2023 Sep.
3
Common seed dispersers contribute most to the persistence of a fleshy-fruited tree.常见的种子传播者对肉质果实树的持续存在贡献最大。
Commun Biol. 2023 Mar 27;6(1):330. doi: 10.1038/s42003-023-04647-y.