Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
J Surg Res. 2022 Apr;272:139-145. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2021.11.016. Epub 2021 Dec 9.
BACKGROUND: In the age of COVID-19 and enforced social distancing, changes in patterns of trauma were observed but poorly understood. Our aim was to characterize traumatic injury mechanisms and acuities in 2020 and compare them with previous years at our level I trauma center. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients with trauma triaged in 2016 through 2020 from January to May were reviewed. Patient demographics, level of activation (1 versus 2), injury severity score, and mechanism of injury were collected. Data from 2016 through 2019 were combined, averaged by month, and compared with data from 2020 using chi-squared analysis. RESULTS: During the months of interest, 992 patients with trauma were triaged in 2020 and 4311 in 2016-2019. The numbers of penetrating and level I trauma activations in January-March of 2020 were similar to average numbers for the same months during 2016 through 2019. In April 2020, there was a significant increase in the incidence of penetrating trauma compared with the prior 4-year average (27% versus 16%, P < 0.002). Level I trauma activations in April 2020 also increased, rising from 17% in 2016 through 2019 to 32% in 2020 (P < 0.003). These findings persisted through May 2020 with similarly significant increases in penetrating and high-level trauma. CONCLUSIONS: In the months after the initial spread of COVID-19, there was a perceptible shift in patterns of trauma. The significant increase in penetrating and high-acuity trauma may implicate a change in population dynamics, demanding a need for thoughtful resource allocation at trauma centers nationwide in the context of a global pandemic.
背景:在 COVID-19 时代和强制社会隔离的情况下,观察到创伤模式发生了变化,但理解不足。我们的目的是描述 2020 年和我们一级创伤中心以往年份的创伤损伤机制和严重程度,并将它们进行比较。
材料与方法:回顾了 2016 年至 2020 年 1 月至 5 月期间分诊至创伤中心的患者。收集患者的人口统计学资料、激活级别(1 级或 2 级)、创伤严重程度评分和损伤机制。将 2016 年至 2019 年的数据合并,按月份平均化,并使用卡方分析与 2020 年的数据进行比较。
结果:在研究期间的相关月份,2020 年分诊了 992 例创伤患者,2016 年至 2019 年分诊了 4311 例。2020 年 1 月至 3 月的穿透性和 1 级创伤激活数量与前 4 年同期的平均数量相似。2020 年 4 月,穿透性创伤的发生率与前 4 年同期相比显著增加(27%比 16%,P<0.002)。2020 年 4 月 1 级创伤激活数量也增加,从 2016 年至 2019 年的 17%增加到 2020 年的 32%(P<0.003)。这些发现一直持续到 2020 年 5 月,穿透性和高严重程度创伤的显著增加也保持不变。
结论:在 COVID-19 最初传播后的几个月里,创伤模式发生了明显的变化。穿透性和高严重程度创伤的显著增加可能暗示着人口动态的变化,这在全球大流行的背景下,需要全国创伤中心深思熟虑地分配资源。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021-2-1
JAMA Netw Open. 2022-2-1
West J Emerg Med. 2021-9-2
World J Clin Cases. 2024-12-16
J Surg Res. 2023-1