Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, Oakland, California.
Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, Oakland, California.
J Surg Res. 2023 Sep;289:16-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2023.02.002. Epub 2023 Feb 22.
Since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, we experienced alterations to modes of transportation among trauma patients suffering penetrating injuries. Historically, a small percentage of our penetrating trauma patients use private means of prehospital transportation. Our hypothesis was that the use of private transportation among trauma patients increased during the COVID-19 pandemic and was associated with better outcomes.
We retrospectively reviewed all adult trauma patients (January 1, 2017 to March 19, 2021), using the date of the shelter-in-place ordinance (March 19, 2020) to separate trauma patients into prepandemic and pandemic patient groups. Patient demographics, mechanism of injury, mode of prehospital transportation, and variables such as initial Injury Severity Score, Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission, ICU length of stay, mechanical ventilator days, and mortality were recorded.
We identified 11,919 adult trauma patients, 9017 (75.7%) in the prepandemic group and 2902 (24.3%) in the pandemic group. The number of patients using private prehospital transportation also increased (from 2.4% to 6.7%, P < 0.001). Between the prepandemic and pandemic private transportation cohorts, there were reductions in mean Injury Severity Score (from 8.1 ± 10.4 to 5.3 ± 6.6: P = 0.02), ICU admission rates (from 15% to 2.4%: P < 0.001), and hospital length of stay (from 4.0 ± 5.3 to 2.3 ± 1.9: P = 0.02). However, there was no difference in mortality (4.1% and 2.0%, P = 0.221).
We found that there was a significant shift in prehospital transportation among trauma patients toward private transportation after the shelter-in-place order. However, this did not coincide with a change in mortality despite a downward trend. This phenomenon could help direct future policy and protocols in trauma systems when battling major public health emergencies.
自 COVID-19 大流行开始以来,我们观察到创伤患者穿透性损伤的运输方式发生了变化。历史上,我们只有一小部分穿透性创伤患者使用私人的院前运输方式。我们的假设是,COVID-19 大流行期间创伤患者使用私人交通工具的比例增加,并与更好的结果相关。
我们回顾性分析了所有成年创伤患者(2017 年 1 月 1 日至 2021 年 3 月 19 日),使用就地避难令(2020 年 3 月 19 日)将创伤患者分为大流行前组和大流行组。记录患者的人口统计学、损伤机制、院前运输方式以及初始损伤严重程度评分、重症监护病房(ICU)入院、ICU 住院时间、机械通气天数和死亡率等变量。
我们共纳入 11919 例成年创伤患者,其中 9017 例(75.7%)为大流行前组,2902 例(24.3%)为大流行组。使用私人院前运输的患者人数也有所增加(从 2.4%增加到 6.7%,P<0.001)。在大流行前和大流行私人运输队列之间,平均损伤严重程度评分(从 8.1±10.4 降至 5.3±6.6:P=0.02)、ICU 入院率(从 15%降至 2.4%:P<0.001)和住院时间(从 4.0±5.3 降至 2.3±1.9:P=0.02)均有所下降。然而,死亡率没有差异(4.1%和 2.0%,P=0.221)。
我们发现,在就地避难令发布后,创伤患者的院前运输方式发生了显著变化,向私人交通方式转移。然而,尽管死亡率呈下降趋势,但这并没有导致死亡率的变化。这一现象有助于指导未来创伤系统应对重大公共卫生紧急事件时的政策和方案。