Thomashow Byron, Stiegler Marjorie, Criner Gerard J, Dransfield Mark T, Halpin David M G, Han MeiLan K, Lange Peter, Martinez Fernando J, Midwinter Dawn, Singh Dave, Tabberer Maggie, Wise Robert A, Lipson David A, Jones Paul
Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, United States.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States.
Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis. 2022 Jan 27;9(1):68-79. doi: 10.15326/jcopdf.2021.0259.
In the InforMing the PAthway of COPD Treatment (IMPACT) trial, single-inhaler fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) reduced moderate/severe exacerbation rates versus FF/VI and UMEC/VI in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This post hoc analysis tested the relationship between baseline health status, risk of future exacerbations, and efficacy outcomes.
IMPACT was a Phase 3, double-blind, 52-week trial in patients with symptomatic COPD (COPD Assessment Test [CAT] score ≥10) and ≥1 moderate/severe exacerbation in the prior year randomized 2:2:1 to FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25mcg, FF/VI 100/25mcg, or UMEC/VI 62.5/25mcg. Annual rate of on-treatment moderate/severe exacerbations, lung function, and safety were analyzed by continuous baseline CAT score.
Moderate/severe exacerbation rates increased with increasing baseline CAT scores in FF/UMEC/VI and UMEC/VI arms. There was a very small increase in on-treatment pneumonia rates at higher baseline CAT scores across all treatment arms. FF/UMEC/VI reduced moderate/severe exacerbation rates versus UMEC/VI (i.e., the inhaled corticosteroid effect) consistently across the range of CAT scores. The reduction with FF/UMEC/VI versus FF/VI (i.e., the long-acting muscarinic antagonist effect) was greatest at lower CAT scores and appeared lesser at higher CAT scores. Improvements in lung function were observed with FF/UMEC/VI versus FF/VI and UMEC/VI, regardless of baseline CAT score.
The CAT score was predictive of exacerbation risk. Worse baseline health status was associated with higher moderate/severe exacerbation and pneumonia rates. Irrespective of baseline CAT score, FF/UMEC/VI improved lung function, and reduced the annual moderate/severe exacerbation rates versus dual therapy. Results indicate an overall favorable benefit-risk profile of triple versus dual therapy, irrespective of CAT score. Clinical Trial Registration:GSK (CTT116855/NCT02164513).
在慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)治疗路径信息(IMPACT)试验中,与氟替卡松糠酸酯/维兰特罗(FF/VI)和乌美溴铵/维兰特罗(UMEC/VI)相比,单吸入器氟替卡松糠酸酯/乌美溴铵/维兰特罗(FF/UMEC/VI)降低了COPD患者中重度急性加重率。这项事后分析检验了基线健康状况、未来急性加重风险和疗效结果之间的关系。
IMPACT是一项针对有症状的COPD患者(COPD评估测试[CAT]评分≥10)且前一年有≥1次中重度急性加重的3期双盲、为期52周的试验,患者按2:2:1随机分为接受100/62.5/25微克的FF/UMEC/VI组、100/25微克的FF/VI组或62.5/25微克的UMEC/VI组。根据连续的基线CAT评分分析治疗期间中重度急性加重的年发生率、肺功能和安全性。
在FF/UMEC/VI组和UMEC/VI组中,中重度急性加重率随基线CAT评分升高而增加。在所有治疗组中,基线CAT评分较高时,治疗期间肺炎发生率有非常小的增加。在整个CAT评分范围内,FF/UMEC/VI组与UMEC/VI组相比均降低了中重度急性加重率(即吸入性糖皮质激素的作用)。FF/UMEC/VI组与FF/VI组相比(即长效毒蕈碱拮抗剂的作用),在较低CAT评分时降低幅度最大,在较高CAT评分时降低幅度较小。无论基线CAT评分如何,与FF/VI组和UMEC/VI组相比,FF/UMEC/VI组肺功能均有改善。
CAT评分可预测急性加重风险。基线健康状况较差与较高的中重度急性加重和肺炎发生率相关。无论基线CAT评分如何,FF/UMEC/VI组均改善了肺功能,并降低了与双联疗法相比的年中重度急性加重率。结果表明,无论CAT评分如何,三联疗法与双联疗法相比总体上具有良好的效益风险比。临床试验注册:葛兰素史克公司(CTT116855/NCT02164513)。