Division of Pulmonary Diseases and Critical Care Medicine, University of North Carolina, School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Division of Clinical Science, St George's, University of London, London, UK.
Pulm Pharmacol Ther. 2018 Apr;49:11-19. doi: 10.1016/j.pupt.2017.12.005. Epub 2017 Dec 19.
In clinical trials of inhaled bronchodilators, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) guidelines recommend that patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are assessed alongside lung function. How these endpoints are related is unclear.
Pooled longitudinal data from 23 randomised controlled COPD studies were analyzed (N = 23,213). Treatments included long-acting β agonists, long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LABAs or LAMAs) and the LABA/LAMA combination QVA149. Outcome measures were Transition Dyspnoea Index (TDI) and St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) scores, COPD exacerbation frequency and rescue medication use. Relationships between changes in trough forced expiratory volume in one second (ΔFEV) and outcomes following treatment were assessed using correlations of data summaries and model-based analysis: generalized linear mixed-effect regression modelling to determine if ΔFEV could predict patient outcomes with different treatments.
Mean age was 64 years, 73% were male, and most had moderate (45%) or severe (52%) disease. Statistically significant correlations were observed between ΔFEV and each outcome measure (exacerbations Rs = 0.05; rescue medication, SGRQ, TDI, r = 0.11-0.16; all p < .001). Patients with greater improvements in trough FEV had on average better SGRQ and TDI scores, fewer exacerbations, and used less rescue medication. For SGRQ and TDI scores, minimal clinically important differences were observed over the range of pooled ΔFEV values. Model-based predictions confirmed the treatment effect was partly explained by changes in FEV from baseline with improvements in PROs observed across all treatments when trough FEV improved. Across all endpoints active treatments were better than placebo (p < .0001), and LABA/LAMA treatment resulted in numerically better treatment outcomes than either monocomponent.
These data suggest that FEV improvements post-bronchodilation correlate with PRO improvements. Further improvements in patient outcomes may be expected by maximizing lung function improvements.
Registration details for the 23 randomised controlled studies used in this pooled analysis are supplied in Additional File 4.
在吸入性支气管扩张剂的临床试验中,慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)指南建议同时评估患者报告的结局(PRO)和肺功能。但这些终点之间的关系尚不清楚。
对 23 项随机对照 COPD 研究的汇总纵向数据进行分析(N=23213)。治疗包括长效β激动剂、长效抗毒蕈碱药物(LABA 或 LAMA)和 LABA/LAMA 联合药物 QVA149。结局测量指标包括过渡呼吸困难指数(TDI)和圣乔治呼吸问卷(SGRQ)评分、COPD 加重频率和急救药物使用情况。采用数据汇总相关性和基于模型的分析评估治疗后用力呼气量(FEV)谷值变化与结局的关系:广义线性混合效应回归模型,以确定 FEV 变化是否可以预测不同治疗方法的患者结局。
平均年龄为 64 岁,73%为男性,大多数患者(45%)为中度或(52%)重度疾病。FEV 谷值与各项结局测量指标之间存在显著相关性(加重事件,Rs=0.05;急救药物、SGRQ、TDI,r=0.11-0.16;均 P<0.001)。FEV 谷值改善程度较大的患者平均 SGRQ 和 TDI 评分较高、加重事件较少且急救药物使用较少。对于 SGRQ 和 TDI 评分,在观察到的 FEV 谷值变化范围内,发现了最小临床重要差异。基于模型的预测结果证实,改善 PRO 是治疗效果的部分原因,在所有治疗中,当 FEV 从基线改善时,均观察到 PRO 改善。与安慰剂相比,所有活性治疗均优于安慰剂(P<0.0001),且 LABA/LAMA 治疗在各个结局指标上的治疗效果均优于单一成分治疗。
这些数据表明,支气管扩张后 FEV 的改善与 PRO 的改善相关。通过最大限度地提高肺功能改善,可能会期望患者结局进一步改善。
本汇总分析中使用的 23 项随机对照研究的注册详情见补充文件 4。