President Emeritus (CCC), West Virginia University Health System, Morgantown, WV; Adjunct Professor of Gerontology and Geriatrics (CCC), Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC.
JP Gibbons Professor Emeritus of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Dean Emeritus of Medical Education (DGB), Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC.
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2022 Jul;30(7):747-758. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2021.11.014. Epub 2021 Dec 3.
Religion and spirituality have long been considered important social determinants of human health, and there exists an extensive body of research to support such. End-of-life (EOL) may raise complex questions for individuals about religious and spiritual (R/S) values guiding advance care planning (ACP) and EOL care decisions, including the provision of spiritual care. This commentary will review the history and current national trends of ACP activities for EOL, principally within the United States. It will describe the relationship of religious variables and the attributes of selected research instruments used to study religious variables on ACP and EOL preferences. The review also summarizes unique ACP challenges for patients with neurocognitive disorders and severe mental illness. Findings disclose that higher levels of religiosity, reliance on religious coping, conservative faith traditions, and "belief in God's control over life's length and divine intervention have lower levels of ACP and more intensive EOL care preferences, although the provision of spiritual spiritual care at EOL mitigates intensive EOL care. Based upon the curated evidence, we propose an epistemological justification to consider "faith" as a separately defined religious variable in future ACP and EOL research. This review is relevant to geriatric psychiatrists and gerontological health care professionals, as they may be part of multidisciplinary palliative care teams; provide longitudinal care to patients with neurocognitive disorders and severe mental illness; and may provide diagnostic, emotional, and therapeutic services for patients and families who may struggle with EOL care decisions.
宗教和精神信仰一直被视为人类健康的重要社会决定因素,有大量的研究支持这一观点。临终(EOL)可能会引发个人对指导预先护理计划(ACP)和 EOL 护理决策的宗教和精神(R/S)价值观的复杂问题,包括提供精神关怀。本评论将回顾 EOL 的 ACP 活动的历史和当前国家趋势,主要是在美国。它将描述宗教变量的关系以及用于研究宗教变量对 ACP 和 EOL 偏好的选择研究工具的属性。该综述还总结了神经认知障碍和严重精神疾病患者的独特 ACP 挑战。研究结果表明,宗教程度较高、依赖宗教应对方式、保守的信仰传统以及“相信上帝控制生命的长短和神圣干预”与较低水平的 ACP 和更强化的 EOL 护理偏好相关,尽管在 EOL 提供精神关怀可以减轻强化的 EOL 护理。基于已有的证据,我们提出了一个认识论上的理由,即在未来的 ACP 和 EOL 研究中,将“信仰”视为一个单独定义的宗教变量。这篇综述与老年精神病学家和老年保健专业人员相关,因为他们可能是多学科姑息治疗团队的一部分;为患有神经认知障碍和严重精神疾病的患者提供纵向护理;并可能为可能在 EOL 护理决策中挣扎的患者及其家属提供诊断、情感和治疗服务。