文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

β 受体阻滞剂降低了使用依维莫司洗脱支架经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的靶病变血运重建。

β-Blockers Reduced the Target Lesion Revascularization After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Using an Everolimus-eluting Stent.

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.

Department of Cardiology, Toshima Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

In Vivo. 2022 Jan-Feb;36(1):416-423. doi: 10.21873/invivo.12719.


DOI:10.21873/invivo.12719
PMID:34972743
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8765150/
Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIM: The effect of β-adrenergic blockers on everolimus-eluting stent (EES) implantation is unknown. We aimed to investigate how β-blockers affect the outcomes of EES by using the Tokyo-MD PCI registry data and analyse real-world data in this drug-eluting stent era in Japan. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We selected 1,899 patients who underwent EES implantation. We compared patients with β-blocker administration versus those without, at follow-up regarding the incidence rate of ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (ID-TLR), all-cause death, cardiac death, acute myocardial infarction (AMI), and stent thrombosis (ST). RESULTS: Patients in the β-blocker group had higher coronary risks than those in the non-β-blocker group. Although no significant difference was observed in the five-year incidence of all-cause death, cardiac death, AMI, and ST between the two groups, the incidence of ID-TLR was significantly lower in the β-blocker group (4.5% vs. 6.6%; p=0.04). β-Blocker administration (hazard ratio=0.61; p=0.016) was negatively associated with ID-TLR via multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: β-Blocker administration reduced ID-TLR after percutaneous coronary intervention using an EES despite the greater comorbid risks and more severe disease lesions.

摘要

背景/目的:β-肾上腺素能阻滞剂对依维莫司洗脱支架(EES)植入的影响尚不清楚。我们旨在使用东京-MD PCI 注册数据研究β受体阻滞剂如何影响 EES 的结果,并分析日本这个药物洗脱支架时代的真实世界数据。 患者和方法:我们选择了 1899 名接受 EES 植入术的患者。我们比较了在随访期间使用β受体阻滞剂的患者与未使用β受体阻滞剂的患者,比较缺血驱动的靶病变血运重建(ID-TLR)、全因死亡、心脏死亡、急性心肌梗死(AMI)和支架血栓形成(ST)的发生率。 结果:β受体阻滞剂组患者的冠状动脉风险高于非β受体阻滞剂组。尽管两组间全因死亡、心脏死亡、AMI 和 ST 的五年发生率无显著差异,但β受体阻滞剂组的 ID-TLR 发生率显著较低(4.5% vs. 6.6%;p=0.04)。多因素分析显示,β受体阻滞剂的使用(风险比=0.61;p=0.016)与 ID-TLR 呈负相关。 结论:尽管存在更大的合并症风险和更严重的疾病病变,β受体阻滞剂的使用仍可降低 EES 经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的 ID-TLR。

相似文献

[1]
β-Blockers Reduced the Target Lesion Revascularization After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Using an Everolimus-eluting Stent.

In Vivo. 2022

[2]
Meta-analysis of everolimus-eluting versus paclitaxel-eluting stents in coronary artery disease: final 3-year results of the SPIRIT clinical trials program (Clinical Evaluation of the Xience V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System in the Treatment of Patients With De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions).

JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013-9

[3]
5-year results of a randomized comparison of XIENCE V everolimus-eluting and TAXUS paclitaxel-eluting stents: final results from the SPIRIT III trial (clinical evaluation of the XIENCE V everolimus eluting coronary stent system in the treatment of patients with de novo native coronary artery lesions).

JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013-11-13

[4]
Impact of chronic kidney disease on long-term clinical outcomes of everolimus-eluting stent implantation: A subanalysis of the Tokyo-MD PCI registry.

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019-2-4

[5]
Incidence and predictors of early and late target lesion revascularization after everolimus-eluting stent implantation in unselected patients in japan.

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017-7

[6]
Comparison of short-term clinical outcomes between Resolute Onyx zotarolimus-eluting stents and everolimus-eluting stent in patients with acute myocardial infarction: Results from the Korea Acute Myocardial infarction Registry (KAMIR).

Cardiol J. 2018-5-10

[7]
Impact of lesion length and vessel size on clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention with everolimus- versus paclitaxel-eluting stents pooled analysis from the SPIRIT (Clinical Evaluation of the XIENCE V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System) and COMPARE (Second-generation everolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents in real-life practice) Randomized Trials.

JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011-11

[8]
Everolimus-Eluting Biodegradable Polymer Versus Everolimus-Eluting Durable Polymer Stent for Coronary Revascularization in Routine Clinical Practice.

JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019-8-14

[9]
Ultrathin Strut Biodegradable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Durable-Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stent for Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization: 2-Year Results of the BIOSCIENCE Trial.

J Am Heart Assoc. 2016-3-15

[10]
4-year clinical outcomes and predictors of repeat revascularization in patients treated with new-generation drug-eluting stents: a report from the RESOLUTE All-Comers trial (A Randomized Comparison of a Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent With an Everolimus-Eluting Stent for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention).

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014-2-13

引用本文的文献

[1]
Prognosis Analysis of Delayed Call Time for Chest Pain in Patients With Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Direct Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2023

[2]
Deteriorative Effect of a Combination of Hypertriglyceridemia and Low High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterolemia on Target Lesion Revascularization after Everolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation.

J Atheroscler Thromb. 2023-12-1

本文引用的文献

[1]
Beta blockers versus calcium channel blockers for provocation of vasospastic angina after drug-eluting stent implantation: a multicentre prospective randomised trial.

Open Heart. 2020-10

[2]
Comparison of paclitaxel-eluting vs. everolimus-eluting stents implanted simultaneously in different lesions of the same coronary artery: 12-month follow-up with optical coherence tomography.

EuroIntervention. 2013-12

[3]
Pathology of second-generation everolimus-eluting stents versus first-generation sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stents in humans.

Circulation. 2013-10-25

[4]
Contemporary incidence and predictors of stent thrombosis and other major adverse cardiac events in the year after XIENCE V implantation: results from the 8,061-patient XIENCE V United States study.

JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012-6

[5]
Impact of the everolimus-eluting stent on stent thrombosis: a meta-analysis of 13 randomized trials.

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011-9-14

[6]
Mechanisms of smooth muscle cell proliferation and endothelial regeneration after vascular injury and stenting: approach to therapy.

Circ J. 2011-4-29

[7]
2011 ACCF/AHA Focused Update Incorporated Into the ACC/AHA 2007 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina/Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.

Circulation. 2011-5-10

[8]
Lack of effect of oral beta-blocker therapy at discharge on long-term clinical outcomes of ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction after primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

Am J Cardiol. 2010-9-9

[9]
Formation of web- and membrane-like structures on the edges of bare-metal coronary stents.

Circ J. 2010-7-6

[10]
Everolimus-eluting versus paclitaxel-eluting stents in coronary artery disease.

N Engl J Med. 2010-5-6

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索