Suppr超能文献

安慰剂对照临床试验中多系统萎缩的尼莫西泮效应:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Nocebo effect in multiple system atrophy: systematic review and meta-analysis of placebo-controlled clinical trials.

机构信息

Department of Geriatrics, the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, 266071, China.

Institute of Neuroregeneration and Neurorehabilition, Qingdao University, Qingdao, 266071, China.

出版信息

Neurol Sci. 2022 Feb;43(2):899-905. doi: 10.1007/s10072-021-05758-2. Epub 2022 Jan 1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Nocebo effect is prevalent among neurological diseases, resulting in low adherence and treatment outcome. We sought to examine the nocebo effect in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in multiple system atrophy (MSA).

METHODS

We searched RCTs in MSA from Medline since September, 2021. RCTs for drug treatment conducted in adult MSA patients with more than 5 cases in each treatment arm were included. We assessed the number of dropout due to placebo intolerance. We also did a symptomatic/disease-modifying subgroup analysis based on two different treatment purposes. The STATA software was used for statistical analysis. Overall heterogeneity was assessed using the Cochran Q and I.

RESULTS

Data were extracted from 11 RCTs fulfilling our search criteria. Of 540 placebo-treated patients, 64.2% reported at least one adverse event (AE) and 7.5% reported dropout because of AEs. The chance of dropping out because of an AE and experiencing at least one AE did not differ between placebo and active drug treatment arms. Besides, the pooled nocebo dropout rate in the symptomatic subgroup was similar to that of the disease-modifying subgroup.

CONCLUSION

In MSA RCTs, nocebo dropout rate was not at a low level among neurological disorders. Nocebo effect was an important reason of dropout because of AE in placebo and active drug treatment arms. Different treatment purposes may not influence nocebo effect.

摘要

背景

在神经科疾病中,“反安慰剂效应”普遍存在,导致患者的依从性和治疗效果较差。我们旨在研究多系统萎缩症(MSA)随机对照试验(RCT)中的反安慰剂效应。

方法

我们检索了自 2021 年 9 月以来在 Medline 上发表的 MSA 相关 RCT。纳入研究对象为成人 MSA 患者,每组治疗例数超过 5 例,且为药物治疗的 RCT。我们评估了因不耐受安慰剂而导致的脱落人数。我们还根据两种不同的治疗目的进行了症状/疾病修正亚组分析。使用 STATA 软件进行统计分析。采用 Cochran Q 和 I 评估整体异质性。

结果

符合检索标准的 RCT 共 11 项,共纳入 540 例接受安慰剂治疗的患者。64.2%的患者报告至少出现一次不良事件(AE),7.5%的患者因 AE 而退出研究。在安慰剂和活性药物治疗组之间,因 AE 而退出的可能性以及至少出现一次 AE 的可能性并无差异。此外,症状亚组的反安慰剂脱落率与疾病修正亚组相似。

结论

在 MSA RCT 中,反安慰剂脱落率在神经科疾病中并不低。反安慰剂效应是导致安慰剂和活性药物治疗组因 AE 而退出的一个重要原因。不同的治疗目的可能不会影响反安慰剂效应。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00bd/8789733/f356353c5453/10072_2021_5758_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验