Dept. of Movement, Human and Health Sciences, University of Rome "Foro Italico", Rome, Italy; Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience, Dept. of Languages and Literatures, Communication, Education and Society, University of Udine, Udine, Italy.
Dept. of Movement, Human and Health Sciences, University of Rome "Foro Italico", Rome, Italy.
Neuroscience. 2022 Feb 10;483:1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2021.12.032. Epub 2021 Dec 29.
Proactive and reactive brain activities usually refer to processes occurring in anticipation or in response to perceptual and/or cognitive events. Previous studies found that, in auditory tasks, musical expertise improves performance mainly at the reactive stage of processing. In the present work, we aimed at acknowledging the effects of musical practice on proactive brain activities as a result of neuroplasticity processes occurring at the level of anticipatory motor/cognitive functions. Accordingly, performance and electroencephalographic recordings were compared between professional musicians and non-musicians during an auditory go/no-go task. Both proactive (pre-stimulus) and reactive (post-stimulus) event-related potentials (ERPs) were analyzed. Behavioral findings showed improved performance in musicians compared to non-musicians in terms of accuracy. For what concerns electrophysiological results, different ERP patterns of activity both before and after the presentation of the auditory stimulus emerged between groups. Specifically, musicians showed increased proactive cognitive activity in prefrontal scalp areas, previously localized in the prefrontal cortex, and reduced anticipatory excitability in frontal scalp areas, previously localized in the associative auditory cortices (reflected by the pN and aP components, respectively). In the reactive stage of processing (i.e., following stimulus presentation), musicians showed enhanced early (N1) and late (P3) components, in line with longstanding literature of enhanced auditory processing in this group. Crucially, we also found a significant correlation between the N1 component and years of musical practice. We interpreted these findings in terms of neural plasticity processes resulting from musical training, which lead musicians to high efficiency in auditory sensorial anticipation and more intense cognitive control and sound analysis.
主动和被动脑活动通常是指在预期或响应感知和/或认知事件时发生的过程。先前的研究发现,在听觉任务中,音乐专业知识主要在处理的反应阶段提高表现。在本工作中,我们旨在承认音乐练习对神经可塑性过程导致的主动脑活动的影响,这些过程发生在预期的运动/认知功能水平。因此,在听觉 Go/No-Go 任务中,我们比较了专业音乐家和非音乐家的表现和脑电图记录。分析了主动(刺激前)和被动(刺激后)事件相关电位(ERP)。行为研究结果表明,音乐家在准确性方面的表现优于非音乐家。就电生理结果而言,在听觉刺激呈现前后,两组之间出现了不同的 ERP 活动模式。具体而言,音乐家在前额头皮区域显示出增加的主动认知活动,这些区域先前定位于前额皮层,并且在前额头皮区域减少了预期的兴奋性,这些区域先前定位于联合听觉皮层(分别由 pN 和 aP 成分反映)。在处理的反应阶段(即刺激呈现后),音乐家表现出增强的早期(N1)和晚期(P3)成分,与该组中增强的听觉处理的长期文献一致。至关重要的是,我们还发现 N1 成分与音乐练习年限之间存在显著相关性。我们根据音乐训练导致的神经可塑性过程来解释这些发现,这些过程使音乐家在听觉感官预期方面具有高效率,并具有更强的认知控制和声音分析能力。