Chen Dong, Luo Mingyao, Fang Kun, Shu Chang
Center of Vascular Surgery, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Disease, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Center of Vascular Surgery, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Disease, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China; Department of Vascular Surgery, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
J Vasc Surg. 2022 May;75(5):1561-1569. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.12.055. Epub 2021 Dec 29.
In the present study, we have reported the midterm results of endovascular repair of acute zone 0 intramural hematomas (IMHs) with the most proximal tear or ulcer-like projection (ULP) in the descending aorta.
Data from patients with acute zone 0 IMH with the most proximal tear or ULP in the descending aorta from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2019, were retrospectively reviewed. We performed Kaplan-Meier curves to calculate the intervention-free survival and survival after endovascular or open surgical repair. We used propensity score matching to compare the outcomes of endovascular and open surgical repair.
The present study included 99 patients. Of the 99 patients, 34 had initially received medical treatment. The 0.5-, 1-, and 3-year intervention-free survival rates for the 34 patients were 23.5%, 17.6%, and 14.7%, respectively. Of the 99 patients, 51 had undergone endovascular therapy, 27 after initial medical treatment. Most of these 51 patients had had a maximal diameter of the ascending aorta of <50 mm and a maximal diameter of IMH in the ascending aorta of <10 mm. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rate for the endovascular group was 98.0%. Finally, 42 patients had undergone open surgery (3 after medical treatment), and the 1-, 3-, 5-year survival rates were all 92.9%. After propensity score matching, no statistically significant difference was found in the 30-day and follow-up mortality. However, endovascular repair was associated with a shorter operation time (69 vs 314 minutes; P < .001), shorter length of intensive care unit stay (24 vs 70 hours; P = .001), and shorter length of hospital stay (7 vs 12 days; P = .011).
For patients with acute zone 0 IMH and the most proximal tear or ULP in the descending aorta, in addition to open surgery, endovascular repair is an option if the maximal diameter of the ascending aorta is <50 mm and the maximal diameter of the IMH in the ascending aorta is <10 mm.
在本研究中,我们报告了对降主动脉近端撕裂或溃疡样凸起(ULP)的急性0区壁内血肿(IMH)进行血管腔内修复的中期结果。
回顾性分析2010年1月1日至2019年12月31日期间降主动脉近端撕裂或ULP的急性0区IMH患者的数据。我们绘制了Kaplan-Meier曲线,以计算血管腔内修复或开放手术修复后的无干预生存率和生存率。我们使用倾向评分匹配来比较血管腔内修复和开放手术修复的结果。
本研究纳入了99例患者。在这99例患者中,34例最初接受了药物治疗。这34例患者的0.5年、1年和3年无干预生存率分别为23.5%、17.6%和14.7%。在这99例患者中,51例接受了血管腔内治疗,其中27例在初始药物治疗后进行。这51例患者中大多数升主动脉最大直径<50 mm,升主动脉IMH最大直径<10 mm。血管腔内治疗组的1年、3年和5年生存率为98.0%。最后,42例患者接受了开放手术(3例在药物治疗后),1年、3年、5年生存率均为92.9%。倾向评分匹配后,30天和随访死亡率无统计学显著差异。然而,血管腔内修复的手术时间更短(69分钟对314分钟;P <.001),重症监护病房住院时间更短(24小时对70小时;P =.001),住院时间更短(7天对12天;P =.011)。
对于降主动脉近端撕裂或ULP的急性0区IMH患者,除开放手术外,如果升主动脉最大直径<50 mm且升主动脉IMH最大直径<10 mm,血管腔内修复也是一种选择。