Coleman Kennith, Grabo Daniel, Wilson Alison, Bardes James
Department of Surgery, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.
West Virginia University Health Sciences Center, Morgantown, WV, USA.
Am Surg. 2023 May;89(5):1561-1565. doi: 10.1177/00031348211060422. Epub 2022 Jan 3.
Prehospital tourniquet application is not a standard trauma team activation (TTA) criterion recommended by the ACS COT. Tourniquet use has seen a resurgence recently with associated risks and benefits of more liberal usage. Our institution added tourniquet application as TTA criterion in January 2019. This study aimed to evaluate the effect this would have on patient care and overtriage.
A prospective analysis was conducted for all TTA associated with tourniquets placed during 2019. An overtriage analysis was conducted utilizing a modified Cribari method as described in comparing patients that met standard TTA criteria (TTA-S), to those who met criteria due to tourniquet placement (TTA-T).
During the study, there were 46 TTA with tourniquets. Mean prehospital tourniquet time was 80 minutes. Median ISS was 10, 8 (17%) had an ISS >15. Urgent operative intervention was needed in 74%, with 23% and 21% requiring orthopedic and vascular procedures, respectively. Tourniquets were correctly placed in 80% and clinically appropriate in 57%. Of these subjects, 25 (54%) were TTA-S and 21 TTA-T. Overtriage analysis was performed. Overtriage for TTA-T was 33.3%. Overtriage among TTA-S was 4%.
Patients with prehospital tourniquets are frequently severely injured. The immediate presence of a trauma surgeon can have significant impacts in these cases. This is particularly important in a rural environment with long tourniquet times. Prehospital tourniquet application as a TTA criteria does not result in excessive overtriage.
院前止血带应用并非美国外科医师学会创伤质量改进项目(ACS COT)推荐的标准创伤团队启动(TTA)标准。近年来,止血带的使用有所复兴,其使用更为广泛,伴随有相关的风险和益处。我们机构于2019年1月将止血带应用添加为TTA标准。本研究旨在评估这一举措对患者护理及过度分诊的影响。
对2019年期间与放置止血带相关的所有TTA进行前瞻性分析。采用一种改良的克里巴里方法进行过度分诊分析,该方法如[参考文献]所述,将符合标准TTA标准(TTA-S)的患者与因放置止血带而符合标准的患者(TTA-T)进行比较。
在研究期间,有46例TTA使用了止血带。院前止血带平均使用时间为80分钟。损伤严重度评分(ISS)中位数为10,8例(17%)ISS>15。74%的患者需要紧急手术干预,其中分别有23%和21%的患者需要骨科和血管手术。止血带放置正确的占80%,临床应用恰当的占57%。在这些受试者中,25例(54%)为TTA-S,21例为TTA-T。进行了过度分诊分析。TTA-T的过度分诊率为33.3%。TTA-S中的过度分诊率为4%。
院前使用止血带的患者通常伤势严重。创伤外科医生的即时到场在这些病例中可能会产生重大影响。在止血带使用时间较长的农村环境中,这一点尤为重要。将院前止血带应用作为TTA标准不会导致过度分诊。