Blais M, Jucla M, Maziero S, Albaret J-M, Chaix Y, Tallet J
Toulouse NeuroImaging Center, Toulouse University, Inserm, UPS, Toulouse, France.
EuroMov Digital Health in Motion, Univ Montpellier, IMT Mines Alés, Montpellier, France.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2021 Dec 15;15:744562. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.744562. eCollection 2021.
The present study investigates procedural learning of motor sequences in children with developmental coordination disorder (DCD) and/or developmental dyslexia (DD), typically-developing children (TD) and healthy adults with a special emphasis on (1) the role of the nature of stimuli and (2) the neuropsychological functions associated to final performance of the sequence. Seventy children and ten adults participated in this study and were separated in five experimental groups: TD, DCD, DD, and DCD + DD children and adults. Procedural learning was assessed with a serial reaction time task (SRTT) that required to tap on a specific key as accurately and quickly as possible when stimuli appeared on the screen. Three types of stimuli were proposed as cues: the classical version of the SRTT with 4 squares aligned horizontally on the screen, giving visuospatial cues (VS cues), and two modified versions, with 4 letters aligned horizontally on the screen (VS + L cues) and letters at the center of the screen (L cues). Reaction times (RT) during the repeated and random blocks allowed assessing three phases of learning: global learning, specific learning and retention of the sequence. Learning was considered as completed when RT evolved significantly in the three phases. Neuropsychological assessment involved, among other functions, memory and attentional functions. Our main result was that learning and retention were not influenced by the available cues in adults whereas learning improved with specific cues in children with or without neurodevelopmental disorders. More precisely, learning was not completed with L cues in children with neurodevelopmental disorders. For children with DD, learning was completed with the VS and VS + L cues whereas for children with DCD (with or without DD), learning was completed with combined VS + L cues. Comorbidity between DD and DCD had no more impact on procedural learning than DCD alone. These results suggest that learning depends on the nature of cues available during practice and that cues allowing learning and retention depend on the type of disorder. Moreover, selective attention was correlated with RT during retention, suggesting that this neuropsychological function is important for procedural learning whatever the available cues.
本研究调查了患有发育性协调障碍(DCD)和/或发育性阅读障碍(DD)的儿童、发育正常儿童(TD)以及健康成年人在运动序列程序学习方面的情况,特别关注(1)刺激性质的作用,以及(2)与序列最终表现相关的神经心理功能。七十名儿童和十名成年人参与了本研究,并被分为五个实验组:TD组、DCD组、DD组、DCD + DD组儿童和成年人。程序学习通过序列反应时任务(SRTT)进行评估,该任务要求在屏幕上出现刺激时尽可能准确和快速地点击特定按键。提出了三种类型的刺激作为线索:SRTT的经典版本,屏幕上水平排列4个方块,提供视觉空间线索(VS线索),以及两个修改版本,屏幕上水平排列4个字母(VS + L线索)和屏幕中央的字母(L线索)。重复和随机块中的反应时(RT)用于评估学习的三个阶段:整体学习、特定学习和序列保留。当RT在三个阶段有显著变化时,学习被认为完成。神经心理评估除其他功能外,还涉及记忆和注意力功能。我们的主要结果是,成年人的学习和保留不受可用线索的影响,而有或没有神经发育障碍的儿童的学习在有特定线索时会得到改善。更确切地说,患有神经发育障碍的儿童使用L线索时学习未完成。对于患有DD的儿童,使用VS和VS + L线索时学习完成,而对于患有DCD(有或没有DD)的儿童,使用组合的VS + L线索时学习完成。DD和DCD的共病对程序学习的影响并不比单独的DCD更大。这些结果表明,学习取决于练习期间可用线索的性质,并且允许学习和保留的线索取决于障碍的类型。此外,选择性注意力与保留期间的RT相关,这表明无论可用线索如何,这种神经心理功能对程序学习都很重要。