• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肝门部胆管癌支架置入术:单侧与双侧支架置入比较的荟萃分析

Stent insertion for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a meta-analysis of comparison between unilateral and bilateral stenting.

作者信息

Wang Ying, Liu Pei-Pei, Yang Lu-Lu

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Xuzhou Central Hospital, Xuzhou, China.

出版信息

Prz Gastroenterol. 2021;16(4):383-389. doi: 10.5114/pg.2021.105022. Epub 2021 Apr 6.

DOI:10.5114/pg.2021.105022
PMID:34976248
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8690947/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Metal stenting can be used as a primary treatment option for alleviating malignant hilar biliary obstruction (MHBO) symptoms. Although many studies have focused on the topic of unilateral or bilateral stenting for MHBO, there is a clear need for a study comparing these two stenting types in patients with a single type of cancer.

AIM

This meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the relative clinical efficacy of unilateral and bilateral metal stent insertion for hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCCA).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched to identify all relevant studies. This meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan v5.3.

RESULTS

We initially identified 154 studies, seven of which were included in the final meta-analysis. These studies contained 524 HCCA patients treated by either unilateral ( = 215) or bilateral ( = 309) stent insertion. No significant differences were observed between groups in rates of technical success (OR = 0.93; 95% CI: 0.34-2.54, = 0.88), clinical success (OR = 1.03; 95% CI: 0.49-2.15, = 0.94), stent dysfunction (OR = 1.47; 95% CI: 0.91-2.39, = 0.12), or survival (HR = 0.85; 95% CI: 0.50-1.42, = 0.53). However, the unilateral group exhibited significantly lower complication rates (OR = 0.34; 95% CI: 0.13-0.88, = 0.03). Significant heterogeneity was found in the endpoint of survival. Funnel plot analysis did not suggest any publication bias relating to the selected study endpoints.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to bilateral metal stenting, unilateral metal stenting could provide a similar clinical efficacy for patients with HCCA with a lower complication rate.

摘要

引言

金属支架置入术可作为缓解恶性肝门部胆管梗阻(MHBO)症状的主要治疗选择。尽管许多研究都聚焦于MHBO单侧或双侧支架置入这一话题,但显然需要一项针对单一癌症类型患者比较这两种支架置入类型的研究。

目的

本荟萃分析旨在评估肝门部胆管癌(HCCA)单侧和双侧金属支架置入术的相对临床疗效。

材料与方法

检索PubMed、Embase和Cochrane图书馆数据库以识别所有相关研究。本荟萃分析使用RevMan v5.3进行。

结果

我们最初识别出154项研究,其中7项纳入最终荟萃分析。这些研究包含524例接受单侧(n = 215)或双侧(n = 309)支架置入术治疗的HCCA患者。两组在技术成功率(OR = 0.93;95%CI:0.34 - 2.54,P = 0.88)、临床成功率(OR = 1.03;95%CI:0.49 - 2.15,P = 0.94)、支架功能障碍(OR = 1.47;95%CI:0.91 - 2.39,P = 0.12)或生存率(HR = 0.85;95%CI:0.50 - 1.42,P = 0.53)方面未观察到显著差异。然而,单侧组的并发症发生率显著更低(OR = 0.34;95%CI:0.13 - 0.88,P = 0.03)。在生存终点发现显著异质性。漏斗图分析未提示与所选研究终点相关的任何发表偏倚。

结论

与双侧金属支架置入术相比,单侧金属支架置入术可为HCCA患者提供相似的临床疗效,且并发症发生率更低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/431d/8690947/6066df311280/PG-16-43718-g002a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/431d/8690947/6c35eb830108/PG-16-43718-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/431d/8690947/6066df311280/PG-16-43718-g002a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/431d/8690947/6c35eb830108/PG-16-43718-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/431d/8690947/6066df311280/PG-16-43718-g002a.jpg

相似文献

1
Stent insertion for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a meta-analysis of comparison between unilateral and bilateral stenting.肝门部胆管癌支架置入术:单侧与双侧支架置入比较的荟萃分析
Prz Gastroenterol. 2021;16(4):383-389. doi: 10.5114/pg.2021.105022. Epub 2021 Apr 6.
2
Endoscopic metal stenting for malignant hilar biliary obstruction: an update meta-analysis of unilateral versus bilateral stenting.内镜金属支架置入术治疗恶性肝门部胆管梗阻:单侧与双侧支架置入术的最新荟萃分析
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2021 Sep;16(3):472-481. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2021.104196. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
3
Unilateral Versus Side-By-Side Metal Stenting for Malignant Hilar Biliary Obstruction: A Meta-Analysis.单侧与并排金属支架置入治疗恶性肝门部胆管梗阻:一项荟萃分析。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2021 Feb;31(2):203-209. doi: 10.1089/lap.2020.0400. Epub 2020 Jul 9.
4
Percutaneous metal stenting for malignant hilar biliary obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of unilateral versus bilateral stenting.经皮金属支架置入术治疗恶性肝门部胆管梗阻:单侧与双侧支架置入术的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2021 Feb;46(2):749-756. doi: 10.1007/s00261-020-02643-y. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
5
Bilateral stenting for hilar biliary obstruction: a meta-analysis of side-by-side versus stent-in-stent.双侧支架置入治疗肝门部胆管梗阻:支架对置与支架内支架的荟萃分析。
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2022 Apr;31(4):525-530. doi: 10.1080/13645706.2020.1871371. Epub 2021 Jan 12.
6
Self-Expanded Metallic Stent Insertion for Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma: Comparison of Unilateral and Bilateral Stenting.自膨式金属支架置入术治疗肝门部胆管癌:单侧与双侧支架置入的比较
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2019 Dec;29(12):1501-1506. doi: 10.1089/lap.2019.0509. Epub 2019 Sep 24.
7
Self-expandable metal stents versus plastic stents for malignant biliary obstruction: a meta-analysis.自膨式金属支架与塑料支架治疗恶性胆管梗阻的Meta分析
Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Aug;82(2):256-267.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.03.1980. Epub 2015 May 13.
8
Side-by-side versus stent-in-stent bilateral stenting for malignant hilar biliary obstruction: a meta-analysis.恶性肝门部胆管梗阻的并排支架置入术与支架内支架双侧支架置入术:一项荟萃分析
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2022 Jun;17(2):279-288. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2021.112477. Epub 2022 Jan 9.
9
Bilateral unilateral placement of metal stents for inoperable high-grade hilar biliary strictures: A systemic review and meta-analysis.双侧与单侧金属支架置入术治疗不可切除高位肝门胆管狭窄:系统评价和荟萃分析。
World J Gastroenterol. 2019 Sep 14;25(34):5210-5219. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i34.5210.
10
Unilateral and bilateral radioactive stent insertion in patients diagnosed with inoperable hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a comparative analysis.对诊断为无法手术切除的肝门部胆管癌患者进行单侧和双侧放射性支架置入术:一项对比分析。
Front Oncol. 2024 Oct 1;14:1412933. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1412933. eCollection 2024.

引用本文的文献

1
Safety and Efficacy of Unilateral and Bilateral Stenting for Hilar Biliary Obstruction: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.肝门部胆管梗阻单侧与双侧支架置入术的安全性和有效性:一项更新的系统评价与Meta分析
Dig Dis Sci. 2025 Aug 27. doi: 10.1007/s10620-025-09321-3.
2
Endoscopic treatment of unresectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: beyond biliary drainage.不可切除性肝门部胆管癌的内镜治疗:超越胆道引流
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2025 Apr 14;18:17562848251328595. doi: 10.1177/17562848251328595. eCollection 2025.
3
Correlation between liver volume drainage and clinical success after endoscopic biliary drainage of hilar malignant obstruction.

本文引用的文献

1
Unilateral versus bilateral hilar stents for the treatment of cholangiocarcinoma: a multicenter international study.单侧与双侧肝门支架治疗胆管癌:一项多中心国际研究。
Ann Gastroenterol. 2020 Mar-Apr;33(2):202-209. doi: 10.20524/aog.2020.0451. Epub 2020 Feb 12.
2
Unilateral versus bilateral endoscopic stenting in patients with unresectable malignant hilar obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.不可切除性恶性肝门梗阻患者单侧与双侧内镜支架置入术:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Endosc Int Open. 2020 Mar;8(3):E281-E290. doi: 10.1055/a-1067-4326. Epub 2020 Feb 21.
3
Bilateral unilateral placement of metal stents for inoperable high-grade hilar biliary strictures: A systemic review and meta-analysis.
肝门部恶性梗阻内镜下胆道引流术后肝容积引流与临床成功的相关性
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2024 Dec 2;80:100540. doi: 10.1016/j.clinsp.2024.100540. eCollection 2025.
4
Partial Stent-in-Stent Method with an Uncovered Self-Expandable Metallic Stent for Unresectable Malignant Hilar Bile Duct Obstruction.采用未覆盖的自膨式金属支架的部分支架套叠法治疗不可切除的恶性肝门部胆管梗阻
J Clin Med. 2024 Jan 31;13(3):820. doi: 10.3390/jcm13030820.
5
Bilateral versus unilateral radioactive stent insertion for hilar cholangiocarcinoma.双侧与单侧放射性支架置入治疗肝门部胆管癌
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2022 Dec;17(4):672-679. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2022.118776. Epub 2022 Aug 15.
6
Results of endoscopic biliary drainage in patients with malignant hilar stricture.内镜下胆道引流治疗恶性肝门部狭窄的效果。
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2023 Jan 19;78:100153. doi: 10.1016/j.clinsp.2022.100153. eCollection 2023.
双侧与单侧金属支架置入术治疗不可切除高位肝门胆管狭窄:系统评价和荟萃分析。
World J Gastroenterol. 2019 Sep 14;25(34):5210-5219. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i34.5210.
4
Self-Expanded Metallic Stent Insertion for Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma: Comparison of Unilateral and Bilateral Stenting.自膨式金属支架置入术治疗肝门部胆管癌:单侧与双侧支架置入的比较
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2019 Dec;29(12):1501-1506. doi: 10.1089/lap.2019.0509. Epub 2019 Sep 24.
5
Percutaneous stenting for malignant hilar biliary obstruction: a randomized controlled trial of unilateral versus bilateral stenting.经皮支架置入术治疗恶性肝门胆管梗阻:单侧与双侧支架置入术的随机对照试验。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2019 Aug;44(8):2900-2908. doi: 10.1007/s00261-019-02010-6.
6
Comparison of Unilateral With Bilateral Metal Stenting for Malignant Hilar Biliary Obstruction.单侧与双侧金属支架置入治疗恶性肝门部胆管梗阻的比较
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2019 Feb;29(1):43-48. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000594.
7
Bilateral versus unilateral placement of metal stents for inoperable high-grade malignant hilar biliary strictures: a multicenter, prospective, randomized study (with video).不可切除的高位恶性肝门胆管狭窄金属支架的双侧与单侧放置:一项多中心前瞻性随机研究(附视频)
Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Nov;86(5):817-827. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.04.037. Epub 2017 May 4.
8
Unilateral versus bilateral stent insertion for malignant hilar biliary obstruction.单侧与双侧支架置入治疗恶性肝门部胆管梗阻。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2017 Nov;42(11):2745-2751. doi: 10.1007/s00261-017-1174-8.
9
Percutaneous Transhepatic Biliary Stent Implantation for Obstructive Jaundice of Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma: A Prospective Study on Predictors of Stent Patency and Survival in 92 Patients.经皮肝穿刺胆管支架植入术治疗肝门部胆管癌所致梗阻性黄疸:92例患者支架通畅及生存预测因素的前瞻性研究
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2016 Jul;27(7):1047-1055.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2016.02.035. Epub 2016 May 27.
10
Update on Pancreatobiliary Stents: Stent Placement in Advanced Hilar Tumors.胰胆管支架的最新进展:晚期肝门部肿瘤的支架置入
Clin Endosc. 2015 May;48(3):201-8. doi: 10.5946/ce.2015.48.3.201. Epub 2015 May 29.